Skip to content

What's new and readme: we are moving to Python 3.7 - #9942

Merged
feerrenrut merged 12 commits into
nvaccess:masterfrom
josephsl:py3_docsAndReadme
Aug 5, 2019
Merged

What's new and readme: we are moving to Python 3.7#9942
feerrenrut merged 12 commits into
nvaccess:masterfrom
josephsl:py3_docsAndReadme

Conversation

@josephsl

@josephsl josephsl commented Jul 17, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Link to issue number:

Summary of the issue:

What's new and readme still mentions Python 2.7, and in case of what's new, changes were needed.

Description of how this pull request fixes the issue:

Edits include mentioning Python 3.7 in both readme and what's new, as well as fixing things here and there in what's new/Threshold section. See the below section regarding work included in what's new and readme through this pull request and other Threshold work.

Testing performed:

None

Known issues with pull request:

Some parts are missing, such as filling in which issue introduced support for pyserial 3.4 and other things. What's new and readme are subject to change based on comments.

Change log entry:

None

Pull requests addressed by this work

Items with a checkmark are mentioned in what's new. Merge messages are ignored.

Speech refactor

Python 3.7

No entry necessary

@josephsl
josephsl requested a review from feerrenrut July 17, 2019 02:34
@josephsl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Hi all,

Comments from everyone who has worked on or commented on Python 3 are appreciated, especially from Reef, @jcsteh, and @LeonarddeR.

Thanks,

Comment thread user_docs/en/changes.t2t Outdated
@josephsl

josephsl commented Jul 17, 2019 via email

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@LeonarddeR LeonarddeR left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You can change the threshold release heading to 2019.3

Comment thread readme.md Outdated
Comment thread user_docs/en/changes.t2t Outdated
Comment thread user_docs/en/changes.t2t Outdated
@josephsl

josephsl commented Jul 17, 2019 via email

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@josephsl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Hi,

Should we mention textUtils?

Thanks.

@LeonarddeR

LeonarddeR commented Jul 17, 2019 via email

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@josephsl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Hi,

Regarding text utils, I have nothing to say - can't come up with a descriptive changelog for developers at the moment.

Anything else from our PR pool? If not, I'll switch the PR to review mode.

Thanks.

@josephsl
josephsl marked this pull request as ready for review July 17, 2019 23:39
@LeonarddeR

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

How about something within the lines of:

@josephsl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Hi,

Text utils: done.

Thanks.

@feerrenrut feerrenrut left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is looking pretty good. Please update the description to cover which PR's (to threshold / threshold staging) have been covered by this. You can get most of the way there by copying entries from git log on the threshold branch. I suggest using the checkbox markdown:

- [ ] some PR not covered
- [x] some PR covered

@josephsl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Hi,

I'll use git shortlog to edit the description.

Thanks.

@josephsl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Hi,

To @LeonarddeR: whenever you are ready, please take a look at this PR. Thanks.

@feerrenrut

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks @josephsl, I have updated the description so that they render as a checkboxes. It looks like there are still many PR's that need consideration.

@josephsl

josephsl commented Jul 23, 2019 via email

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@feerrenrut

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

If no one volunteers before tomorrow (25-July 0600 UTC+0) , then I'll finish this off.

@LeonarddeR LeonarddeR left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I found two sentences where has should be have IMO. Could be wrong for the latter, though.

Comment thread user_docs/en/changes.t2t Outdated
Comment thread user_docs/en/changes.t2t Outdated
- config.ConfigManager.getConfigValidationParameter is removed. A bug in getConfigValidation has been fixed in order for it being able to fully replace getConfigValidationParameter
- inputCore.InputGesture.logIdentifier property has been removed. Now use inputCore.InputGesture.identifiers[0] instead.
- textInfos.Point and textInfos.Rect has been removed and replaced by locationHelper.Point and locationHelper.RectLTRB, respectively.
- braille.BrailleHandler._get/set_tether has been removed. Use getTether and setTether respectively.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
- braille.BrailleHandler._get/set_tether has been removed. Use getTether and setTether respectively.
- braille.BrailleHandler._get/set_tether have been removed. Use getTether and setTether respectively.

@josephsl

josephsl commented Jul 24, 2019 via email

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@josephsl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Hi,

Let me at least commit the requested edits, and then I think we should decide our next steps.

Thanks.

@feerrenrut

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I'd like to get this finished off and merged in, are you going to continue with it @josephsl? I don't think I will hold back threshold any longer.

@josephsl

josephsl commented Jul 25, 2019 via email

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@josephsl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Hi,

Clarification: I'm done with this one.

Thanks.

feerrenrut added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2019
Cherry picked changes from #9942

Closes #8421
@LeonarddeR

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@josephsl: could you please do a base branch switch for this?

josephsl added 3 commits July 27, 2019 08:39
Because Appveyor changes Python x.y.z fromtime to time, it is bettre to just say Python x.y.
@josephsl
josephsl changed the base branch from threshold to changesFileLineEndingsChanged_master July 27, 2019 15:42
@josephsl
josephsl changed the base branch from changesFileLineEndingsChanged_master to master July 27, 2019 15:43
josephsl added 3 commits July 27, 2019 08:44
What's new entry suggested by Leonard de Ruijter (Babbage).
Reviewed by Leonard de Ruijter (Babbage): has -> have for two entries.
@josephsl
josephsl force-pushed the py3_docsAndReadme branch from 1cd5b05 to fc7e441 Compare July 27, 2019 15:45
@josephsl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Done.

@derekriemer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Should this be merged?

@josephsl

josephsl commented Aug 4, 2019 via email

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@feerrenrut

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@derekriemer The checklist for PR's needs to be completed, I suspect many of these do not need an entry. This is on my list of things to do, but hasn't yet received priority.

@feerrenrut

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I have gone through the unchecked items and added entries.

I also re-arranged the current items in the changes file.

@feerrenrut
feerrenrut dismissed LeonarddeR’s stale review August 5, 2019 20:26

Changes were addressed

@feerrenrut
feerrenrut merged commit ddf27fa into nvaccess:master Aug 5, 2019
@nvaccessAuto nvaccessAuto added this to the 2019.3 milestone Aug 5, 2019
@josephsl
josephsl deleted the py3_docsAndReadme branch September 16, 2019 01:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Update changes file on threshold branch

7 participants