Enable cross-crate-inlining when MIR inlining is enabled

[saethlin]

This would make #117355 generally less obscure, and also seems like a good idea, even if for some reason someone wants MIR opts but no codegen opts.

[rustbot]

r? @davidtwco

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

[rustbot]

Some changes occurred to MIR optimizations

cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt

[saethlin]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit e53b18f with merge 0921115...

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 0921115 (0921115edc8311366c1b7ff5496610b1a7fd3d23)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (0921115): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	1.7%	[1.7%, 1.7%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.6%	[2.1%, 3.0%]	3
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	1.7%	[1.7%, 1.7%]	1

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.4%	[2.2%, 2.5%]	2
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 633.735s -> 634.874s (0.18%)
Artifact size: 304.43 MiB -> 304.41 MiB (-0.01%)

[tmiasko]

@bors r+ rollup

[bors]

📌 Commit e53b18f has been approved by tmiasko

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit e53b18f with merge 650991d...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: tmiasko
Pushing 650991d to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (650991d): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	2.0%	[2.0%, 2.0%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.4%	[-1.9%, -0.9%]	3
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-1.9%	[-2.6%, -1.1%]	11
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.5%	[-1.9%, 2.0%]	4

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 636.057s -> 634.048s (-0.32%)
Artifact size: 304.45 MiB -> 304.41 MiB (-0.01%)