Conversation
95f1adb to
666fa0e
Compare
* Use the same mechanism in product selection and installation. * Display the texts from the backend.
666fa0e to
f0c5135
Compare
|
|
||
| if repositories.empty? | ||
| start_progress(3) | ||
| start_progress_with_size(3) |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In this case the descriptions are known in advance. Should we use the with_descritptions constructor?
| return; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (status === IDLE) return <Navigate to="/" replace />; |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Probably we could move this navigation to App:
if (status === IDLE && location.pathname === "/products/progress") {
return <Navigate to="/" />;
}
So App would contain all the "routing" logic until we will improve the router usage.
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I see your point, but it is not part of this PR and, most importantly, I am scared of breaking the navigation again 😅. I would keep it as it is until we fix the router usage.
Merged
imobachgs
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 27, 2024
Prepare for releasing Agama 9. It includes the following pull requests: - #1101 - #1202 - #1228 - #1231 - #1236 - #1238 - #1239 - #1240 - #1242 - #1243 - #1244 - #1245 - #1246 - #1247 - #1248 - #1249 - #1250 - #1251 - #1252 - #1253 - #1254 - #1255 - #1256 - #1257 - #1258 - #1259 - #1260 - #1261 - #1264 - #1265 - #1267 - #1268 - #1269 - #1270 - #1271 - #1272 - #1273 - #1274 - #1279 - #1280 - #1284 - #1285 - #1286 - #1287 - #1288 - #1289 - #1290 - #1291 - #1292 - #1293 - #1294 - #1295 - #1296 - #1298 - #1299 - #1300 - #1301 - #1302 - #1303 - #1304 - #1305 - #1306 - #1307 - #1308 - #1309 - #1310 - #1311 - #1312 - #1313 - #1314 - #1315 - #1316 - #1317 - #1318 - #1319 - #1320 - #1321 - #1322 - #1323 - #1324 - #1325 - #1326 - #1328 - #1329 - #1331 - #1332 - #1334 - #1338 - #1340 - #1341 - #1342 - #1343 - #1344 - #1345 - #1348 - #1349 - #1351 - #1352 - #1353 - #1354 - #1355 - #1356 - #1357 - #1358 - #1359 - #1360 - #1361 - #1362 - #1363 - #1365 - #1366 - #1367 - #1368 - #1371 - #1372 - #1374 - #1375 - #1376 - #1379 - #1380 - #1381 - #1383 - #1384 - #1385 - #1386 - #1387 - #1388 - #1389 - #1391 - #1392 - #1394 - #1395 - #1397 - #1398 - #1399 - #1400 - #1403
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Trello: https://trello.com/c/Miuvai6N/3706-5-better-progress-report-during-installation
The main goal of this PR is to implement a better mechanism for displaying progress in the web UI. It takes the product selection progress as inspiration but eliminates hardcoded values.
Progress API problem
When we designed the initial progress API, Agama was quite different. While working on this PR, we have identified a relevant problem: there is no way to have a subprogress in the same service.
The manager service defines the main steps (e.g., "Probing Software") and the details are just the progress from software and storage services (e.g., "Refreshing repositories metadata").
As a consequence, we cannot have a detailed "Configuring system" step at the end of the installation with its details (e.g., "Writing users"). You can only have either 1) a "Configuring system" with no details or several separate steps, which is too much.
In general, we are telling people that they can use the WS to track the progress, so we should decide on a stable API as soon as possible.
Screenshots
Installation progress
Product selection selection progress
As you may see in the following screenshot, some texts have been changed. The reason is that now it uses the texts from the backend. We should consider adjusting them.
