Bump modeling api & pull thru csg endpoints

[jessfraz]

No description provided.

[qa-wolf]

QA Wolf here! As you write new code it's important that your test coverage is keeping up.
Click here to request test coverage for this PR!

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Updated (UTC)
modeling-app	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	Apr 10, 2025 11:53pm

[Irev-Dev]

we will eventually wanna call mikes get object ids in the scene to figure out what solids are left to return back to the user

Yeah maybe, hard to wrap my head around it, my main concern is to make sure we update the artifactGraph accordingly, but knowing solid ids will be important for selecting the result of one CSG to do another one (as that's the only time we set the engine selection filter to objects)

We'll mess with it a bunch to see what needs to happen.

[jessfraz]

yeah i need to know which of the solids you passed in still exist after this operation to return them back out, i personally need that one, or else i might return one that is now gone forever

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Walltime Performance Report

Merging #6245 will degrade performances by 14.27%

_{Comparing bump-modeling-apoi (05fef09) with main (df6f571)}

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

Summary

⚡ 46 improvements
❌ 7 regressions
✅ 39 untouched benchmarks

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Benchmarks breakdown

	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Change
❌	execute_80-20-rail	3.4 s	3.9 s	-12.07%
⚡	parse_80-20-rail	9.1 ms	7.7 ms	+16.88%
⚡	parse_ball-bearing	3.9 ms	3.3 ms	+17.37%
⚡	parse_bench	3.7 ms	3.3 ms	+13.56%
⚡	parse_bracket	2.8 ms	2.4 ms	+15.81%
⚡	execute_car-wheel-assembly	20.4 s	17.8 s	+15.06%
⚡	parse_car-wheel-assembly	399.3 µs	348.6 µs	+14.56%
⚡	parse_color-cube	2.8 ms	2 ms	+38.03%
⚡	parse_cycloidal-gear	4.2 ms	3.8 ms	+12.46%
❌	execute_dodecahedron	1.5 s	1.7 s	-14.27%
⚡	parse_dodecahedron	12.5 ms	10.4 ms	+19.7%
⚡	execute_dual-basin-utility-sink	4.3 s	3.7 s	+16.7%
⚡	parse_dual-basin-utility-sink	15.5 ms	13.8 ms	+12.17%
⚡	parse_enclosure	13.3 ms	10.5 ms	+27.09%
⚡	parse_exhaust-manifold	12.5 ms	10.8 ms	+15.76%
⚡	parse_flange	1.3 ms	1.1 ms	+16.73%
⚡	parse_focusrite-scarlett-mounting-bracket	10 ms	8.5 ms	+16.97%
⚡	parse_food-service-spatula	13.2 ms	11.6 ms	+13.74%
❌	execute_french-press	4.2 s	4.7 s	-11.89%
⚡	parse_french-press	12.5 ms	10.7 ms	+17.39%
...	...	...	...	...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

[Irev-Dev]

yeah i need to know which of the solids you passed in still exist after this operation to return them back out, i personally need that one, or else i might return one that is now gone forever

Just going of some of hand comments from Mike, It might be all new Ids for the solid itself.

[jessfraz]

yeah i think we can get this in and fuck with it but if i have to i can reuse the clone code to repropulate the solid but would be hard we'd need new endpoints so i say we fuck around and find out and merge this for simple shit

[jessfraz]

like recreating all the tags is going to be a cluster fuck if they are all new ids and i dont want this PR to gate that

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 85.50725% with 20 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 84.89%. Comparing base (9d0518d) to head (05fef09).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
rust/kcl-lib/src/std/csg.rs	82.75%	20 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6245      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.90%   84.89%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         109      109              
  Lines       44842    44964     +122     
==========================================
+ Hits        38073    38171      +98     
- Misses       6769     6793      +24     

Flag	Coverage Δ
rust	84.89% <85.50%> (-0.02%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.