Register extension from web UI

[lslezak]

Problem

• Extensions can be registered only from command line or in autoinstallation

Solution

• Implement the web UI

Screenshots

The first proposal:

After registering the registration code field and the button is replaced by "registered" status text:

[dgdavid]

Thanks, @lslezak!

To be honest, I'm not completely sure how this will look when we have a bunch of extensions, but it definitely seems like a very good starting point to me.

That said, I’ve left a few comments that I think could help refine it a bit more before releasing a first iteration.

Hope it helps.

[lslezak]

DBus error

[dgdavid]

🙈

[mvidner]

Just a note about the aa{sv} versus a{sv} confusion referenced earlier, I have tried to improve ruby-dbus to report a better error message for this, but it is a bit hard to fix because the weird "a Dictionary is actually an Array of Dictionary-Entries" concept is spread through the code base.

mvidner/ruby-dbus#148

[lslezak]

I tried to simplify the code in b40dea6, but now it fails with error:

error[E0277]: the `?` operator can only be used in a closure that returns `Result` or `Option` (or another type that implements `std::ops::FromResidual`)
   --> agama-lib/src/product/client.rs:157:46
    |
156 |             .map(|hash| AddonProperties {
    |                  ------ this function should return `Result` or `Option` to accept `?`
157 |                 id: get_property(&hash, "id")?,
    |                                              ^ cannot use the `?` operator in a closure that returns `software::model::registration::AddonProperties`
    |
    = help: the trait `std::ops::FromResidual<std::result::Result<std::convert::Infallible, zbus::zvariant::Error>>` is not implemented for `software::model::registration::AddonProperties`

See the full log at https://github.com/agama-project/agama/actions/runs/14464157813/job/40562519285#step:8:619.

No idea how to fix that... 😟

[lslezak]

OK, now it compiles fine.

[imobachgs]

The Rust part looks good.

[imobachgs]

It would be a good idea to move this code to a separate function. But, for now, it is good enough. Thanks!