[kuhar]

Align the public documentation with the simulator and translation coverage currently represented in the tree.

Mark CDNA3, CDNA4, CDNA5, RDNA3, and RDNA4 simulation support as Beta; keep CDNA5 scoped to gfx1250; use family target names where appropriate; remove the DBT and DBI table columns; and document the experimental CDNA4-to-CDNA3 translation path.

Refresh the emulation overview without a brittle ISA count, and expand the configuration guide to list every checked-in simulator and DBT guest configuration.

[therock-pr-bot]

❌ PR Check — Action Required

Check	Status	Details
📝 PR Description	❌ Fail	Error: PR description must reference a JIRA ID, ISSUE ID, or a GitHub closing keyword. Expected: include a JIRA ID / ISSUE ID line (separator : or -, or omitted; value may be a JIRA key, a number with/without #, or a link), OR a closing keyword + issue reference. Accepted examples: • JIRA ID : TESTAUTO-6039 • JIRA ID - #330 • JIRA ID #330 • JIRA ID (on separate line) ROCM-25757 • ISSUE ID : TESTUTO-3334 • ISSUE ID #3334 • ISSUE ID - TESTAUTO-3433 • ISSUE ID (on separate line) AIRUNTIME-2352 • ISSUE ID : https://github.com/<org_name>/<repo_name>/issues/1234 • Closes #10 • Fixes octo-org/octo-repo#100 • Resolves: #123 • #123 • https://github.com/<org_name>/<repo_name>/issues/123 Current: no valid JIRA/ISSUE/closing-keyword reference found
⛔ Forbidden Files	✅ Pass	—
🧪 Unit Test	✅ Pass	PR does not contain code files — Unit Test auto-passed
🔎 pre-commit	✅ Pass	—
🚫 Draft PR	🔜 To Be Enabled	—
🚩 Feature Flag	🔜 To Be Enabled	—
📊 Code Coverage	🔜 To Be Enabled	—

⚠️ 1 policy check(s) failed. Please address the issues above before this PR can be Reviewed.

🚫 Please fix the failed policies

• ❌ PR Description

The Not ready to Review label was added to this PR. Once all policies pass, the label is removed automatically.

📖 Need help? See the Policy FAQ for details on every check and how to fix failures.

🙋 Wish to Override Policy?

[therock-pr-bot]

🚫 Please fix the failed policies before requesting reviews.

The following policy checks failed:

• ❌ PR Description

The Not ready to Review label has been added to this PR.
Once all policies pass, the label will be removed automatically.

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Updates rocjitsu/emulation documentation to better reflect current architecture coverage and the checked-in simulator/DBT configuration set.

Changes:

• Refresh rocjitsu “Supported architectures” presentation (simplify columns; mark newer families as Beta; add note about experimental CDNA4→CDNA3 DBT).
• Expand the configuration guide to enumerate all checked-in simulator JSON configs and DBT guest-mode configs.
• Update the emulation overview to reflect broader ISA coverage and remove brittle ISA-count phrasing.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

File	Description
emulation/rocjitsu/README.md	Simplifies the supported-architectures table and updates support-status messaging.
emulation/rocjitsu/docs/configuration.md	Reworks the configuration guide to list all checked-in simulator and DBT guest config JSON files.
emulation/README.md	Refreshes the rocjitsu architecture overview wording and corresponding mermaid diagram labels.

Suppressed comments (1)

emulation/README.md:109

• The ISA Layer box in the mermaid diagram omits RDNA3.5 even though it’s implemented (there’s a dedicated rdna3_5 ISA). This makes the diagram inconsistent with the code and the earlier components list.

                I1["Per-ISA: decoders, execution, operand types, machine instr structs, encoding formats<br/>CDNA1–5, RDNA1–4"]

---

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

[atgutier]

LGTM, but worth checking if copilot is right about 1151.