fix: quiet settled threads and simplify PR badges

[juliusmarminge]

Settled threads showed Link PR actions and colored badges that competed with active work. They now hide Link PR actions and mute text and icons until hover or keyboard focus, while existing PR links stay clickable.

Building on #11104, multiple unrelated PR links now use a neutral total count, such as +11 for eleven links, instead of a colored remainder count. Mobile reuses the existing others field. This is shared by the web/desktop sidebar and composer, with matching mobile labels. Single PR and stack badges keep their existing presentation.

Verified in an isolated web app with disposable fixture data, including hover and keyboard focus. Web and mobile typechecks passed; targeted lint passed with existing Sidebar and mobile list warnings. The mobile presentation test covers the new total count and neutral color. Native simulator verification was unavailable on this Linux host, which has no Android SDK installed.

Before	After

Hover and focus restore the PR status color:

https://gh-file-drop-api-prod-mi5fy3sowv63ufte.pinglabs.workers.dev/f/0f78237789565163/hover.mp4

Model: GPT-6. Harness: Codex.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• UI Improvements
  • Unsettled rows now appear dimmed until hovered or focused, while keyboard focus restores emphasis to titles and project icons.
  • Branch-link actions are hidden for unsettled rows.
  • Pull-request indicators show total linked counts in a compact +N format with muted styling.
  • Mobile thread lists display icons and labels for linked pull requests, with neutral styling for linked or draft pull requests.
• Bug Fixes
  • Pull-request badge labels now accurately represent multiple unrelated linked pull requests.

[macroscopeapp]

Approvability

Verdict: Approved at ddedee6

Macroscope's review found this PR approvable — This is a focused UI-only change that simplifies linked pull-request badges and visually quiets settled threads across mobile and web, with no schema or production-infrastructure impact. An unresolved medium-severity finding still identifies a settled card-row action that remains visible and must be handled separately.

Notes:

• This verdict was updated automatically after the outstanding correctness findings were resolved. Macroscope did not re-review the code.

^{You can add or adjust custom eligibility rules. Learn more.}

[github-actions]

Thread transfer impact

✅ Thread transfer remains within every enforced ceiling.

Provider	Metric	Main baseline	This PR	Impact	PR ceiling
Codex	Total thread wire	13.6 KiB	13.6 KiB	−54 B (−0.4%)	15.1 KiB	✅
Codex	Thread snapshot wire	7.1 KiB	7.0 KiB	−14 B (−0.2%)	7.3 KiB	✅
Codex	Live turn WebSocket wire	6.5 KiB	6.5 KiB	−40 B (−0.6%)	7.8 KiB	✅
Codex	Live turn WebSocket decoded	57.0 KiB	57.0 KiB	−44 B (−0.1%)	66.4 KiB	✅
Codex	Live turn messages	9	8	−1 (−11.1%)	21	✅
Claude	Total thread wire	13.6 KiB	13.6 KiB	−18 B (−0.1%)	15.1 KiB	✅
Claude	Thread snapshot wire	7.1 KiB	7.1 KiB	−1 B (−0.0%)	7.3 KiB	✅
Claude	Live turn WebSocket wire	6.5 KiB	6.5 KiB	−17 B (−0.3%)	7.8 KiB	✅
Claude	Live turn WebSocket decoded	57.8 KiB	57.8 KiB	0 B (0.0%)	66.4 KiB	✅
Claude	Live turn messages	9	9	0 (0.0%)	21	✅

Baseline: 0882431 · PR result: ddedee6 · Source CI: success

Scenario and decoded snapshot size

10 historical turns, 5 command tools per turn, 878.9 KiB retained MCP result per historical turn, and a 1.05 MiB retained result in the measured turn.

• Codex decoded thread snapshot: 113.9 KiB
• Claude decoded thread snapshot: 114.6 KiB

Updated in place by a trusted workflow. PR artifacts are strictly validated and never executed.

[coderabbitai]

Note

Reviews paused

It looks like this branch is under active development. To avoid overwhelming you with review comments due to an influx of new commits, CodeRabbit has automatically paused this review. You can configure this behavior by changing the reviews.auto_review.auto_pause_after_reviewed_commits setting.

Use the following commands to manage reviews:

• @coderabbitai resume to resume automatic reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a single review.

Use the checkboxes below for quick actions:

• ▶️ Resume reviews
• 🔍 Trigger review

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Team

Run ID: 3c0472d0-4060-439b-b07c-77153886a8c5

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 420bdd9 and ddedee6.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)

• apps/mobile/src/features/threads/thread-list-items.tsx
• apps/mobile/src/features/threads/thread-list-v2-items.tsx
• apps/mobile/src/state/thread-pr-presentation.ts
• apps/mobile/src/state/use-thread-pr.test.ts

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 10 included reviews per hour; 4 remain after this review.

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Un-settle sidebar rows now use reduced emphasis until hover or focus. Branch pull-request links no longer render for these rows. Linked pull-request labels now show total counts with muted styling across web and mobile presentations.

Changes

Presentation updates

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Sidebar un-settle rows apps/web/src/components/Sidebar.tsx	Un-settle rows dim text and project icons until hover or focus. Slim-row titles restore emphasis on keyboard focus. Branch pull-request links do not render for un-settle rows.
Linked pull-request count presentation apps/mobile/src/state/thread-pr-presentation.ts, apps/mobile/src/features/threads/thread-list-items.tsx, apps/mobile/src/features/threads/thread-list-v2-items.tsx, apps/web/src/components/ThreadStatusIndicators.tsx, apps/mobile/src/state/use-thread-pr.test.ts	Non-stack linked pull requests expose total counts as +N, use muted styling, and render updated icons and labels. The presentation model tracks additional links through others. The test expects the compact +2 label and muted styling.

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes

Suggested reviewers: t3dotgg, maria-rcks, extoci

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to ddede

This change only updates pull-request badge counts, styling, and settled-row emphasis while preserving existing links. Current evidence indicates it is ready to merge.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 66.67% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 3 functions across 6 files.	Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly summarizes the two main changes: quieting settled threads and simplifying pull-request badges.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description explains what changed and why, includes UI screenshots and an interaction video, documents validation results and limitations, and describes the mobile and web behavior. It omits the t…

• Fix all pre-merge checks with AI

✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1

📝 Generate docstrings 💡

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch t3code/mute-settled-thread-actions

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

Dismissing prior approval to re-evaluate 7e26fbf

Dismissing prior approval to re-evaluate 420bdd9

[juliusmarminge]

Reviewed the final CodeRabbit docstring-coverage warning. No new function was added; the changed tint helper now treats a multi-PR count as neutral. Its purpose is clear from its name and body. Per this repository's documentation guidance, I am not adding a comment that repeats the implementation solely to satisfy the coverage suggestion. All current-head checks pass or are skipped, and both inline review threads are resolved.

Dismissing prior approval to re-evaluate ddedee6