Skip to content

Bug 1873043: Bump to kube 1.19.0 #25495

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
deads2k merged 3 commits into from
Sep 16, 2020
Merged

Bug 1873043: Bump to kube 1.19.0 #25495

deads2k merged 3 commits into from
Sep 16, 2020

Conversation

@marun
Copy link
Contributor

@marun marun commented Sep 14, 2020 •
edited
Loading

Required to get e2e-gcp and e2e-aws-fips passing against openshift/kubernetes.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 14, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files label Sep 14, 2020
@marun
Copy link
Contributor Author

marun commented Sep 14, 2020

/cc @sttts @soltysh @mfojtik @deads2k

@marun
Copy link
Contributor Author

marun commented Sep 14, 2020

/uncc @bparees @tbielawa

@soltysh soltysh mentioned this pull request Sep 15, 2020
Closed
@marun marun changed the title WIP Bump to kube 1.19.0 Bump to kube 1.19.0 Sep 16, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 16, 2020
@mfojtik
Copy link
Contributor

mfojtik commented Sep 16, 2020

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 16, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 16, 2020

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: marun, mfojtik

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 16, 2020
@marun marun changed the title Bump to kube 1.19.0 Bug 1873043: Bump to kube 1.19.0 Sep 16, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. label Sep 16, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 16, 2020

@marun: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1873043, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.6.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
Details

In response to this:

Bug 1873043: Bump to kube 1.19.0

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Sep 16, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 16, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 16, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@sttts
Copy link
Contributor

sttts commented Sep 16, 2020

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 16, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@mfojtik
Copy link
Contributor

mfojtik commented Sep 16, 2020

/retest

looks like upgrade failed on OLM problem that was fixed meanwhile and serial failed on infra

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 16, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

4 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 16, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 16, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 16, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 16, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@tnozicka
Copy link
Contributor

tnozicka commented Sep 16, 2020

/retest

@tnozicka
Copy link
Contributor

tnozicka commented Sep 16, 2020

at last 2 e2e-gcp failed on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879591
/retest

@tnozicka
Copy link
Contributor

tnozicka commented Sep 16, 2020

this time a slow CI pull

2020/09/16 15:41:32 Container cp-secret-wrapper in pod e2e-gcp-ipi-install-loki completed successfully
2020/09/16 15:47:22 pod didn't start running within 10 minutes: 
* Container test is not ready with reason CreateContainerError and message context deadline exceeded
2020/09/16 15:48:27 pod didn't start running within 10 minutes: 
* Container test is not ready with reason CreateContainerError and message context deadline exceeded

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 16, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 16, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@tnozicka
Copy link
Contributor

tnozicka commented Sep 16, 2020

infra
/retest

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 16, 2020 •
edited
Loading

@marun: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-gcp ea36632 link /test e2e-gcp

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@tnozicka
Copy link
Contributor

tnozicka commented Sep 16, 2020

gcp IAM flake
/retest

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Sep 16, 2020 •
edited
Loading

This fixes the promotion problem we're having with golang 1.15 based payload. It tested green once.

@deads2k deads2k merged commit a78b89d into openshift:master Sep 16, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 16, 2020

@marun: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1873043 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1873043: Bump to kube 1.19.0

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jsafrane jsafrane mentioned this pull request Sep 17, 2020
Closed
This was referenced Sep 21, 2020
Merged
Merged
Merged
Merged
Merged
This was referenced Sep 29, 2020
Merged
Merged
Merged
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot mentioned this pull request Nov 3, 2020
Merged
12 tasks
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot mentioned this pull request Nov 10, 2020
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@deads2k deads2k Awaiting requested review from deads2k

@mfojtik mfojtik Awaiting requested review from mfojtik

@soltysh soltysh Awaiting requested review from soltysh

@sttts sttts Awaiting requested review from sttts

Assignees

@mfojtik mfojtik

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants

@marun @mfojtik @openshift-ci-robot @openshift-bot @sttts @tnozicka @deads2k