docs(taxonomy): #498 AIF cluster « Procès en incohérence » — second rebut-dominant + heterogeneous sub-sub (taxonomy finding, proposition)

[jsboige]

What

Idle-lane deliverable (dispatch msg-9akcg4 + ai-01 ACK msg-6uufhx naming this candidate: "Procès en inconsistance"). Seventh Layer C cluster. « Procès en incohérence » (Obstruction > Ad hominem > Procès en inconsistance). Anchor 1361 serialized rebut/CA-node attack-columns-only. 3 consistency-attack leaves proposed (1362 Tu quoque, 1363 Whataboutisme, 1364 Critique de l'incohérence passée) — plus a taxonomy-quality finding : 6 misgrouped leaves documented out-of-mechanism.

The cluster's distinctive character — second rebut-dominant, first heterogeneous sub-sub

Second rebut-dominant cluster (after #760 Relativisme). Mechanism = consistency-attack rebuttal : the opponent's position (CA-node) is opposed by the counter-conclusion "your position is void because you are inconsistent". This is the rebut-pole's consistency-attack variant (vs #760's relativism variant). The rebut-pole now has 2 documented variants, mirroring the undermine-pole's 2 variants (#843 + #844) — the attack-type catalog is now symmetric.

First heterogeneous sub-sub — "qualify, don't just serialize". The umbrella "procès en inconsistance" genuinely covers only 1361-1364. The 6 other rows (1365-1370) are misgrouped fallacies with entirely different AIF mechanisms. This is the first cluster where the chantier qualifies the taxonomy rather than merely serializing it.

The 3 serialized leaves — consistency-attack rebuttal, variety in the consistency vector

pk	text_fr	consistency vector
1362	Tu quoque	hypocrisy (acts against own principles)
1363	Whataboutisme	selective treatment (failed to condemn similar)
1364	Critique de l'incohérence passée	temporal drift (changed opinion)

• All rebut/CA-node + native InconsistentCommitment_Conflict (conflict token).
• Axiom 0 violation (3 rebut→CA).
• Native-fit on the conflict layer (3/3), fail-loud on the scheme layer — a new "native-conflict / fail-loud-scheme" modelling shape (hybrid between docs(taxonomy): #498 AIF cluster « Opération inappropriée » — second mixed cluster (5 leaves, math-inference, proposition) #839 fully-fail-loud and docs(taxonomy): #498 AIF cluster « Effet cigogne » — first native-rich causal cluster (6 leaves, proposition) #840/docs(taxonomy): #498 AIF cluster « Sophisme de l'accident » — second native-rich + scheme-diverse (6 leaves, proposition) #841 fully-native-fit).

Taxonomy-quality finding — 6 misgrouped leaves (the real value)

pk	text_fr	actual mechanism	why NOT a consistency-attack
1365	Homme de paille	straw man (misrepresentation)	attacks a fabricated thesis, not the source's consistency. Hub in the #838 84-pair set.
1366	Extension	misrepresentation (push to absurdity)	caricatures the thesis
1367	Tirer de fausses conclusions	misrepresentation	distorts the thesis
1368	Invocation fallacieuse des sophismes	false accusation of fallacy	meta-accusation, not consistency-attack
1369	Accusation de petitio principii	begging the question (circularity)	structural fallacy
1370	Argument du pathos	emotional appeal	attacks via emotion, not consistency

These 6 are flagged for reclassification (gated jsboige), not serialized — forcing them into rebut/CA would violate the axiom and fabricate a consistency-attack. Coverage integrity > coverage count.

Honest note — rebut-vs-undermine tension flagged

Tu quoque / whataboutisme are classically modelled as undermine/I (circumstantial ad hominem). The taxonomy models the anchor 1361 as rebut/CA (the counter-conclusion reading). This cluster follows the anchor (rebut/CA) rather than re-modelling it — re-modelling is a separate gated decision. The tension is documented for jsboige.

Changes

1. docs/taxonomy/498-aif-proces-inconsistance-cluster.md — cluster doc.
2. docs/taxonomy/498-aif-proces-inconsistance-annotations.csv — 4 rows (anchor + 3 leaves), 12 cols.

Scope / posture

• PROPOSITION ONLY, 0 prod CSV write (post-T&A). Serialization deferred to gated apply after jsboige ratifies.
• 0 fabrication — InconsistentCommitment_Conflict verified native ; 6 out-of-mechanism leaves NOT serialized (axiom integrity). Read-only docs lane. Post-tag-safe.
• Verdict QA = ai-01.

Refs

• Dispatch: ai-01 → po-2024 msg-9akcg4 (idle-lane backlog) + ACK msg-6uufhx.
• Companion to docs(taxonomy): #498 AIF cluster « Complication exagérée » — first mixed undercut/undermine (6 leaves, proposition) #837/docs(taxonomy): #498 AIF cluster « Opération inappropriée » — second mixed cluster (5 leaves, math-inference, proposition) #839 (mixed), docs(taxonomy): #498 AIF cluster « Effet cigogne » — first native-rich causal cluster (6 leaves, proposition) #840 (cigogne), docs(taxonomy): #498 AIF cluster « Sophisme de l'accident » — second native-rich + scheme-diverse (6 leaves, proposition) #841 (accident), docs(taxonomy): #498 AIF cluster « Inconsistance » — first undermine-dominant (6 leaves, proposition) #843 (inconsistance), docs(taxonomy): #498 AIF cluster « Attaque personnelle » — second undermine-dominant, most uniform (7 leaves, proposition) #844 (attaque personnelle), feat(taxonomy): #498 Fallacies AIF — serialize scaleup phase 1-3 (47 leaves, MODE 2) #760 (rebut Relativisme), docs(taxonomy): #497 inter-family bridges — 84 cross-family near-dup pairs (all unlinked), proposition #838 (bridges — 1365 straw man is a hub), docs(taxonomy): #498 P1 addendum — audit the 18 ground-truth anchors #770 (anchor audit).

🤖 Generated with Claude Code