docs(taxonomy): #498 AIF cluster « Empoisonner le puits » — third undermine-dominant + second heterogeneous sub-sub (taxonomy finding, proposition)

[jsboige]

What

Idle-lane deliverable (dispatch msg-9akcg4 + ai-01 ACK msg-3a7ffm: "chaque cluster qui révèle un finding taxo vaut plus qu'un cluster de plus"). Eighth Layer C cluster. « Empoisonner le puits » (Obstruction > Saboter le débat). Anchor 1352 serialized undermine/I-node fully-empty (skos + mappingType + CQ all empty). 3 source-discrediting leaves proposed (1353, 1355, 1356) — plus a cross-cluster corroborated taxonomy finding : 4 misgrouped leaves.

The cluster's distinctive character — third undermine-dominant, second heterogeneous sub-sub, first cross-cluster finding

Third undermine-dominant cluster. Mechanism = preemptive source-discrediting (prejudicial info before the argument is heard). This is the preemptive/insinuating variant of undermine (vs #843 direct self-contradiction, #844 direct personal attack). The undermine-pole now has 3 documented variants — the most-developed attack-type pole.

Twin of #844 Diffamation 1402. Leaf 1402 (#844) = reactive defamation (attack reputation in response to an argument). Anchor 1352 (this) = preemptive defamation (discredit before the argument). Both share DirectAdHominem_Inference. This closes the Ad-hominem source-discrediting pair.

3/3 native-fit on the scheme layer (unlike #845, which was fail-loud on the scheme). DirectAdHominem_Inference (native, anchor 1398 #844) fits poisoning-the-well exactly.

The 3 serialized leaves — variety in the discrediting vector

pk	text_fr	discrediting vector
1353	Se contenter de poser des questions	insinuation (leading questions)
1355	Projection psychologique	projection (own defects attributed)
1356	DARVO	role-reversal (victim→offender)

All undermine/I-node + native DirectAdHominem_Inference. Axiom 0 violation (3 undermine→I).

Taxonomy-quality finding — 4 misgrouped leaves + cross-cluster corroboration

pk	text_fr	actual mechanism	why NOT source-discrediting
1354	Convaincre le public	audience appeal	targets the audience, not the source's credibility
1357	Arguments factices	straw man	fabricates arguments to refute — misrepresentation. Sibling of #845's 1365 (Homme de paille).
1358	Utiliser des arguments absurdes	absurdity tactic	tactical absurdity, not source-discrediting
1359	Répondre par de mauvais arguments	two wrongs	weak counter-argument, not source-discrediting

First cross-cluster corroborated finding : the straw-man misgrouping appears in BOTH #845 (1365) and this (1357). Two independent findings pointing to the same missing straw-man grouping in the Obstruction family → stronger signal for jsboige (taxonomy structure, not just leaf reclassification). These 4 are flagged for reclassification, not serialized — coverage integrity > coverage count.

Changes

1. docs/taxonomy/498-aif-empoisonner-le-puits-cluster.md — cluster doc.
2. docs/taxonomy/498-aif-empoisonner-le-puits-annotations.csv — 4 rows (anchor + 3 leaves), 12 cols.

Scope / posture

• PROPOSITION ONLY, 0 prod CSV write (post-T&A). Serialization deferred to gated apply.
• 0 fabrication — DirectAdHominem_Inference verified native ; 4 out-of-mechanism leaves NOT serialized (axiom integrity). Read-only docs lane.
• Verdict QA = ai-01.
• Signal : ancres skos=True clean épuisées ; ce cluster est skos-empty AVEC finding taxo (la barre tenue). C'est probablement le dernier cluster à finding avant bascule trad feat(taxonomy): Iterate on non-card taxonomy nodes + adapt GPT-4 enrichment script #141 / dette — j'attends confirmation ai-01 sur la trajectoire.

Refs

• Dispatch: ai-01 → po-2024 msg-9akcg4 (idle-lane backlog) + ACK msg-3a7ffm.
• Companion to docs(taxonomy): #498 AIF cluster « Complication exagérée » — first mixed undercut/undermine (6 leaves, proposition) #837/docs(taxonomy): #498 AIF cluster « Opération inappropriée » — second mixed cluster (5 leaves, math-inference, proposition) #839 (mixed), docs(taxonomy): #498 AIF cluster « Effet cigogne » — first native-rich causal cluster (6 leaves, proposition) #840 (cigogne), docs(taxonomy): #498 AIF cluster « Sophisme de l'accident » — second native-rich + scheme-diverse (6 leaves, proposition) #841 (accident), docs(taxonomy): #498 AIF cluster « Inconsistance » — first undermine-dominant (6 leaves, proposition) #843/docs(taxonomy): #498 AIF cluster « Attaque personnelle » — second undermine-dominant, most uniform (7 leaves, proposition) #844 (undermine), docs(taxonomy): #498 AIF cluster « Procès en incohérence » — second rebut-dominant + heterogeneous sub-sub (taxonomy finding, proposition) #845 (rebut + finding, straw-man corroborates this), feat(taxonomy): #498 Fallacies AIF — serialize scaleup phase 1-3 (47 leaves, MODE 2) #760 (rebut), docs(taxonomy): #498 P1 addendum — audit the 18 ground-truth anchors #770 (anchor audit).

🤖 Generated with Claude Code