Skip to content

Remove set_value(value, name) from ReadWriteHandle#256

Merged
bmagyar merged 1 commit intoros-controls:masterfrom
bmagyar:remove-set-value-w-name-from-handles
Dec 4, 2020
Merged

Remove set_value(value, name) from ReadWriteHandle#256
bmagyar merged 1 commit intoros-controls:masterfrom
bmagyar:remove-set-value-w-name-from-handles

Conversation

@bmagyar
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@bmagyar bmagyar commented Dec 2, 2020

Resolves #222

These were added for joint_limits_interface but are a little messy in this new API. We'll rework joint_limits_interface with it's own handles, similarly to transmissions where this API can be allowed.

@bmagyar bmagyar requested review from destogl and v-lopez December 2, 2020 08:57
@bmagyar bmagyar force-pushed the remove-set-value-w-name-from-handles branch from 4d20972 to c1a3435 Compare December 2, 2020 09:04
@v-lopez
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

v-lopez commented Dec 2, 2020

You said it was requried due to the limit implementation in #203 (comment)

Can you elaborate as to why is not needed anymore?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@destogl destogl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you say so. The PR is clean.

@bmagyar
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

bmagyar commented Dec 2, 2020

@v-lopez I've explained this in the opening post

@bmagyar bmagyar merged commit 1f0f618 into ros-controls:master Dec 4, 2020
destogl added a commit to b-robotized-forks/ros2_control that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2022
* Fixed ros-controls#255

* correct include in correct header

* Correct order of includes.

Co-authored-by: Denis Štogl <destogl@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Remove/refactor Handle::set_value(std::string name, double value) ?

3 participants