Skip to content

Conversation

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 9, 2018
@smarterclayton smarterclayton merged commit ce075e3 into openshift:master Jun 9, 2018
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@smarterclayton: Updated the following 2 configmaps:

  • config configmap from file cluster/ci/config/prow/config.yaml
  • plugins configmap from file cluster/ci/config/prow/plugins.yaml
Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

wking added a commit to wking/openshift-release that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2018
…ontinue-on-error

Taking advantage of openshift/installer@23915f2e (installer/*: Add
--continue-on-error to destroy workflow, 2018-09-16,
openshift/installer#252) so we can reap at least most of our resources
even if the cluster doesn't come up enough for the machine API
operator to be able to destroy workers.  With various stages of
cluster health:

1. Cluster never comes up at all.
2. Cluster healthy enough to create workers.
3. Cluster healthy enough to destroy workers.

we're only worried about leakage in the space between 2 and 3.
Hopefully there isn't any space there, but without this commit we're
currently leaking resources from 1 as well.

The two-part destroy attempts are originally from 51df634 (Support an
aws installer CI job, 2018-06-07, openshift#928), although there's not much to
motivate them there.  With --continue-on-error destruction, we're
already trying pretty hard to clean everything up.  So excepting brief
network hiccups and such, I think a single pass is sufficient.  And
we'll want a better backstop to catch any resources that leak through
(e.g. orphaned workers), so I'm dropping the retry here.
wking added a commit to wking/openshift-release that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2019
This image has been unused since the e2e template landed in 51df634
(Support an aws installer CI job, 2018-06-07, openshift#928) and since the
Ansible template landed in c35a30a (Add a profile openshift-ansible
custom AWS provisioner, 2018-08-30, openshift#1367).

Also remove the duplicated entry from the src template which landed in
aed67fc (Source installer tests should have access to IMAGE_FORMAT,
2019-01-25, openshift#2701).
@smarterclayton smarterclayton deleted the aws-installer branch April 24, 2019 14:00
wking added a commit to wking/openshift-release that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2022
We've had these in the steps since the steps were created in
23ca2ce (Bootstrap step registry with IPI steps, 2019-11-17, openshift#5962).
It seems to have originally descended from 51df634 (Support an aws
installer CI job, 2018-06-07, openshift#928), where it was used to copy 'oc'
from the test container into the teardown container.  But since the
gather commands are run directly from the 'cli' image, there's no need
for that sort of hoop-jumping.
derekhiggins pushed a commit to derekhiggins/release that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2023
Use a better value for $PS4
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants