Migrate all KEPs to the new template

[wojtek-t]

This will facilitate strenghtening KEP validation

[wojtek-t]

/sig architecture

[wojtek-t]

The missing remaining itmes:

sig-apimachinery:

• /20200309-consistent-resource-versions-semantics [requires creating an issue]

sig-cloud-provider:

• 3 cloud-provider KEPS (alibaba, baiducloud, huaweicloud)

sig-cluster-lifecycle:

• a bunch of stuff

sig-instrumentation:

• /1209-metrics-stability - [requires a bit of cleanup]

sig-network:

• Migrating from old kep to new template: sig-network  #2446 addresses most
• node-local-dns needs to be merged

[shekhar-rajak]

• I need clarification for "sig-cluster-lifecycle". I see directories and sub-directories. Should we just remove the sub-directories under the "sig-cluster-lifecycle" and follow the same pattern as others ?

• Same for sig-instrumentation /1209-metrics-stability directory

[wojtek-t]

I need clarification for "sig-cluster-lifecycle". I see directories and sub-directories. Should we just remove the sub-directories under the "sig-cluster-lifecycle" and follow the same pattern as others ?

No - this splits it to kind of "subprojects". We should basically put the new templates there, e.g. there will be
/sig-cluster-lifecycle/kubeadm/12345-kep-title/(first kep)
/sig-cluster-lifecycle/kubeadm/23466-kep-title/(second kep)

Same for sig-instrumentation /1209-metrics-stability directory

Let's leave it for now - I will handle it later.

[k8s-ci-robot]

@wojtek-t: The label(s) sig/kep), sig/kep) cannot be applied, because the repository doesn't have them

In response to this:

I need clarification for "sig-cluster-lifecycle". I see directories and sub-directories. Should we just remove the sub-directories under the "sig-cluster-lifecycle" and follow the same pattern as others ?

No - this splits it to kind of "subprojects". We should basically put the new templates there, e.g. there will be
/sig-cluster-lifecycle/kubeadm/12345-kep-title/(first kep)
/sig-cluster-lifecycle/kubeadm/23466-kep-title/(second kep)

Same for sig-instrumentation /1209-metrics-stability directory

Let's leave it for now - I will handle it later.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[wojtek-t]

@shekhar-rajak - if would be able to help with cluster-lifecycle, cloud-provider and api-machinery remaining ones it would be huge help - I will handle the remaining networking and instrumentaiton one.

[shekhar-rajak]

Sure @wojtek-t , I will work on it.

[neolit123]

one problem here is that all tracking issues get detached from the KEP locations. i can try updating the SIG CL tracking issues next week.

another problem is that KEP cross-ref links get broken.
i don't think we have many of these in SIG CL, but other SIGs might have them.

[wojtek-t]

another problem is that KEP cross-ref links get broken.
i don't think we have many of these in SIG CL, but other SIGs might have them.

If needed, we can add symlinks to the new locations (there are a few for other SIGs).

[wojtek-t]

There are just few more:

time="2021-02-17T21:12:02+01:00" level=error msg="FAIL: /20200309-consistent-resource-versions-semantics/kep.yaml"
time="2021-02-17T21:12:02+01:00" level=error msg="FAIL: /providers/0020-cloud-provider-alibaba-cloud.md"
time="2021-02-17T21:12:02+01:00" level=error msg="FAIL: /providers/0022-cloud-provider-baiducloud.md"
time="2021-02-17T21:12:02+01:00" level=error msg="FAIL: /providers/20191206-cloud-provider-huaweicloud.md"
time="2021-02-17T21:12:02+01:00" level=error msg="FAIL: /1209-metrics-stability/20190404-kubernetes-control-plane-metrics-stability.md"
time="2021-02-17T21:12:02+01:00" level=error msg="FAIL: /1209-metrics-stability/20190605-metrics-stability-migration.md"
time="2021-02-17T21:12:02+01:00" level=error msg="FAIL: /1209-metrics-stability/20190605-metrics-validation-and-verification.md"
time="2021-02-17T21:12:02+01:00" level=error msg="FAIL: /1209-metrics-stability/20191028-metrics-stability-to-beta.md"

[wojtek-t]

Once #2524 and #2533 are merged, all KEPs will be migrated to the new template.
The only remaining thing I would like to do then is to strenghten validation a bit more.