🎨 Palette: [UX improvement] Add :focus-visible outline to main content - #167
🎨 Palette: [UX improvement] Add :focus-visible outline to main content#167seonghobae wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
![opencode-agent[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1549082?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.
Review outcome
1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
-
Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was
failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head. -
Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.
-
Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports
successwith required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence. -
Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking
needs.coverage-evidence.result == successbefore posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present. -
Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
-
Reason: coverage-evidence result was
failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head3b65c6e314968f76e068853b032ac363031fbc65. -
Head SHA:
3b65c6e314968f76e068853b032ac363031fbc65 -
Workflow run: 29444081797
-
Workflow attempt: 1
Coverage evidence
Coverage Decision
- Result: FAIL
- Test evidence: not proven passing
- Docstring evidence: not proven passing when configured
- Failure count: 1
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (2 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (2 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
Evidence --> S2["Test: test_report.py"]
S2 --> I2["regression suite"]
I2 --> R2["Review risk: Test: test_report.py"]
R2 --> V2["targeted test run"]
OpenCode Review Overview
Pull request overviewOpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass. Review outcome1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
Coverage evidenceCoverage Decision
Changed-File Evidence Mapflowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (3 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (3 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
Evidence --> S2["Test: test_report.py"]
S2 --> I2["regression suite"]
I2 --> R2["Review risk: Test: test_report.py"]
R2 --> V2["targeted test run"]
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.
Review outcome
1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
-
Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was
failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head. -
Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.
-
Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports
successwith required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence. -
Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking
needs.coverage-evidence.result == successbefore posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present. -
Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
-
Reason: coverage-evidence result was
failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head6ac6fe882a71d0f8b146f3b29938fee9a44406d5. -
Head SHA:
6ac6fe882a71d0f8b146f3b29938fee9a44406d5 -
Workflow run: 29444862569
-
Workflow attempt: 1
Coverage evidence
Coverage Decision
- Result: FAIL
- Test evidence: not proven passing
- Docstring evidence: not proven passing when configured
- Failure count: 1
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (3 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (3 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
Evidence --> S2["Test: test_report.py"]
S2 --> I2["regression suite"]
I2 --> R2["Review risk: Test: test_report.py"]
R2 --> V2["targeted test run"]
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Note
Copilot couldn't run its full agentic review because it didn't start before the timeout. Make sure your repository has a runner available, or add a copilot-code-review.yml file specifying one with the runs-on attribute. See the docs for more details.
Adds an accessible keyboard-only focus indicator to the HTML diagnostics report’s skip-link target (<main>), while preserving the existing “no outline on mouse focus” behavior.
Changes:
- Add
main:focus-visibleoutline styling in the report CSS. - Add a regression test to ensure the
<main>target remains programmatically focusable and includes the focus-visible styling. - Document the accessibility improvement in the changelog and internal palette notes.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 4 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| tests/test_report.py | Adds a regression test asserting the rendered HTML includes main skip-link target attributes and focus-visible CSS. |
| python/fast_mlsirm/report.py | Introduces main:focus-visible outline styling in the generated report CSS. |
| CHANGELOG.md | Documents the new keyboard-visible focus outline and accompanying regression test. |
| .jules/palette.md | Adds a learning/action note about pairing outline: none with :focus-visible. |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
| main:focus-visible { | ||
| outline: 3px solid #0f766e; | ||
| outline-offset: 3px; | ||
| } |
| assert "main:focus-visible {" in html | ||
| assert "main:focus {" in html | ||
| assert "outline: 3px solid #0f766e;" in html |
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
d7d3009 to
4096703
Compare
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 36 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (4)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)
tests/test_report.py:256
- The test can pass even if the
main:focus-visiblerule doesn't set the outline, because the HTML also contains the sameoutline: 3px solid #0f766e;in the.skip-link:focus-visiblerule. Make the assertion tie the outline to themain:focus-visibleblock to avoid a false positive.
assert 'id="main-content"' in html
assert 'tabindex="-1"' in html
assert "main:focus-visible {" in html
assert "main:focus {" in html
assert "outline: 3px solid #0f766e;" in html
|
|
||
| ### Changed | ||
|
|
||
| - Added a keyboard-visible focus outline (`main:focus-visible`) to the |
|
Superseded: Palette accessibility/empty-state/tabular-nums/skip-link themes already landed on main (e.g. #283 empty-state ARIA) or this branch is CONFLICTING with no clean rebase path. Closing as superseded. |
|
Closing as superseded: Palette theme already on main or blocked by unresolvable conflicts with current main. Prefer re-open from a fresh branch if still needed. |
Understood. Acknowledging that this work is now obsolete and stopping work on this task. |
Acknowledged. Stopping work as this is superseded. |
💡 무엇을: HTML 리포트의 skip-link 타겟인
<main>컨테이너에:focus-visible아웃라인 스타일을 추가했습니다.🎯 왜: 기존에는 마우스 클릭 시 시각적 거슬림을 없애기 위해
outline: none;처리만 되어 있었습니다. 이로 인해 스크린 리더나 키보드 사용자가 skip-link를 통해 메인 콘텐츠로 이동할 때 포커스 인디케이터가 사라져 접근성이 훼손되는 문제가 있었습니다.📸 이전/이후: 이전에
:focus시 아웃라인이 없었던 문제를 해결하여 탭 키를 누를 때만#0f766e색상의 선명한 아웃라인이 표시됩니다.♿ 접근성: 키보드 네비게이션을 사용하는 장애인 사용자가 현재 어느 영역에 포커스가 있는지 명확히 인지할 수 있도록 WCAG 접근성 지침을 준수했습니다. 마우스 사용자 경험은 그대로 유지됩니다.
PR created automatically by Jules for task 5674868346664492581 started by @seonghobae