🎨 Palette: [UX improvement] 메인 콘텐츠 접근성 강화를 위한 :focus-visible 규칙 추가

[seonghobae]

💡 What (무엇을 추가했나요?):
HTML 리포트의 메인 콘텐츠 컨테이너(<main id="main-content">)에 :focus-visible CSS 규칙을 추가하여, 포커스 시 --teal 색상의 윤곽선(outline)이 표시되도록 했습니다.

🎯 Why (왜 필요한가요?):
이전에 skip-to-content 링크를 사용하여 #main-content로 건너뛸 경우, 마우스 사용자에게 불필요한 시각적 아티팩트를 방지하기 위해 main:focus { outline: none; } 설정이 사용되었습니다. 하지만 이로 인해 키보드 사용자는 skip-link 이동 후 현재 포커스가 어디에 있는지 시각적인 피드백을 받을 수 없었습니다. :focus-visible을 추가함으로써 키보드 사용자에게 명확한 포커스 위치를 알려줍니다.

📸 Before/After (이전/이후):

• Before: 키보드로 skip-link 접근 후 엔터를 누르면 포커스는 이동하지만 화면에 아무런 시각적 변화가 없었습니다.
• After: 키보드로 skip-link 접근 후 엔터를 누르면, 메인 컨텐츠를 둘러싸는 선명한 틸(Teal) 색상의 윤곽선이 나타납니다.

♿ Accessibility (접근성 개선 사항):
시각적인 포커스 표시(Focus Indicators)는 WCAG (웹 콘텐츠 접근성 지침) 표준에서 필수적으로 요구되는 사항입니다. main:focus-visible 규칙을 추가함으로써, 마우스 사용 경험을 해치지 않으면서 키보드 및 스크린 리더 등 보조 기기 사용자들에게 더 나은 내비게이션 경험을 제공합니다.

---

PR created automatically by Jules for task 7083060679882154649 started by @seonghobae

[google-labs-jules]

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

---

For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

[opencode-agent]

Pull request overview

OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.

Review outcome

1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence

• Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.

• Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.

• Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports success with required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.

• Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking needs.coverage-evidence.result == success before posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.

• Result: REQUEST_CHANGES

• Reason: coverage-evidence result was failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head 08a628b8c356f5045e36fa8cd3f262f103cda000.

• Head SHA: 08a628b8c356f5045e36fa8cd3f262f103cda000

• Workflow run: 29361826786

• Workflow attempt: 1

Coverage evidence

Coverage Decision

• Result: FAIL
• Test evidence: not proven passing
• Docstring evidence: not proven passing when configured
• Failure count: 1

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file (2 files)"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (2 files)"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]

Loading

[opencode-agent]

OpenCode Review Overview

• Head SHA: bdbcefab3ec08b2761384aad2acdd58094747f50
• Workflow run: 29363476715
• Workflow attempt: 1
• Gate result: REQUEST_CHANGES (approval step)

Pull request overview

OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.

Review outcome

1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence

• Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.

• Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.

• Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports success with required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.

• Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking needs.coverage-evidence.result == success before posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.

• Result: REQUEST_CHANGES

• Reason: coverage-evidence result was failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head bdbcefab3ec08b2761384aad2acdd58094747f50.

• Head SHA: bdbcefab3ec08b2761384aad2acdd58094747f50

• Workflow run: 29363476715

• Workflow attempt: 1

Coverage evidence

Coverage Decision

• Result: FAIL
• Test evidence: not proven passing
• Docstring evidence: not proven passing when configured
• Failure count: 1

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file (2 files)"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (2 files)"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]

Loading

[opencode-agent]

Pull request overview

OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.

Review outcome

1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence

• Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.

• Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.

• Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports success with required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.

• Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking needs.coverage-evidence.result == success before posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.

• Result: REQUEST_CHANGES

• Reason: coverage-evidence result was failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head 4cae5d93b9c638bc42d8f17d5e30ecba8690939c.

• Head SHA: 4cae5d93b9c638bc42d8f17d5e30ecba8690939c

• Workflow run: 29362169733

• Workflow attempt: 1

Coverage evidence

Coverage Decision

• Result: FAIL
• Test evidence: not proven passing
• Docstring evidence: not proven passing when configured
• Failure count: 1

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file (2 files)"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (2 files)"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]

Loading

[opencode-agent]

Pull request overview

OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.

Review outcome

1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence

• Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.

• Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.

• Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports success with required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.

• Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking needs.coverage-evidence.result == success before posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.

• Result: REQUEST_CHANGES

• Reason: coverage-evidence result was failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head 3b93b3a662efa7c8fda75f47e1fa70625cd77c67.

• Head SHA: 3b93b3a662efa7c8fda75f47e1fa70625cd77c67

• Workflow run: 29362785996

• Workflow attempt: 1

Coverage evidence

Coverage Decision

• Result: FAIL
• Test evidence: not proven passing
• Docstring evidence: not proven passing when configured
• Failure count: 1

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file (2 files)"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (2 files)"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]

Loading

[opencode-agent]

Pull request overview

OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.

Review outcome

1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence

• Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.

• Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.

• Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports success with required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.

• Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking needs.coverage-evidence.result == success before posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.

• Result: REQUEST_CHANGES

• Reason: coverage-evidence result was failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head bdbcefab3ec08b2761384aad2acdd58094747f50.

• Head SHA: bdbcefab3ec08b2761384aad2acdd58094747f50

• Workflow run: 29363476715

• Workflow attempt: 1

Coverage evidence

Coverage Decision

• Result: FAIL
• Test evidence: not proven passing
• Docstring evidence: not proven passing when configured
• Failure count: 1

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file (2 files)"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (2 files)"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]

Loading

[seonghobae]

중복 정리: report.py에 main:focus-visible 규칙을 추가하는 동일 변경이 8건 열려 있습니다. 회귀 테스트를 포함한 #167 을 대표로 남기고 닫습니다. 이 PR은 기존 palette 학습 항목을 한국어로 재작성하는 무관 diff도 포함합니다.

배경: 2026-07-14 이후 조직 coverage-evidence 인프라 문제로 모든 PR이 REQUEST_CHANGES 상태였습니다(인프라 수정: ContextualWisdomLab/.github#611). 필요 시 재오픈 가능합니다.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[google-labs-jules]

중복 정리: report.py에 main:focus-visible 규칙을 추가하는 동일 변경이 8건 열려 있습니다. 회귀 테스트를 포함한 #167 을 대표로 남기고 닫습니다. 이 PR은 기존 palette 학습 항목을 한국어로 재작성하는 무관 diff도 포함합니다.

배경: 2026-07-14 이후 조직 coverage-evidence 인프라 문제로 모든 PR이 REQUEST_CHANGES 상태였습니다(인프라 수정: ContextualWisdomLab/.github#611). 필요 시 재오픈 가능합니다.

---

Generated by Claude Code

Understood. Acknowledging that this work is now obsolete and stopping work on this task.