🎨 Palette: HTML 리포트 본문 건너뛰기 대상 포커스 표시(focus-visible) 추가

[seonghobae]

어떤 작업인가요? (What)

HTML 진단 리포트에서 본문 건너뛰기(Skip to content) 기능 사용 시, 키보드 사용자에게 대상 요소(<main>)의 포커스 상태를 시각적으로 제공하도록 개선했습니다.

왜 이 작업이 필요한가요? (Why)

기존 코드에서는 마우스 클릭 시 불필요한 외곽선을 숨기기 위해 main:focus { outline: none; }를 사용하고 있었습니다. 이로 인해 키보드로 "Skip to main content" 링크를 통해 이동한 사용자도 자신의 현재 포커스 위치를 시각적으로 확인할 수 없는 접근성 문제가 있었습니다.

변경 전/후 (Before/After)

• Before: <main> 요소가 포커스를 받아도 외곽선이 보이지 않음 (outline: none).
• After: 마우스 클릭 시에는 외곽선이 숨겨지지만, 키보드 탭(Tab)으로 진입했을 때는 :focus-visible 선택자를 통해 눈에 띄는 청록색(var(--teal)) 외곽선이 표시됩니다.

접근성 향상 내용 (Accessibility)

• 키보드 접근성 강화: :focus-visible을 적용하여 마우스 사용자의 시각적 거슬림은 방지하면서, 키보드 네비게이션 사용자의 포커스 인지성을 높였습니다.
• 관련 내용은 .jules/palette.md UX 저널에도 기록 완료하였습니다.

---

PR created automatically by Jules for task 14832209072453613471 started by @seonghobae

[google-labs-jules]

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

---

For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

[opencode-agent]

Pull request overview

OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.

Review outcome

1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence

• Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.

• Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.

• Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports success with required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.

• Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking needs.coverage-evidence.result == success before posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.

• Result: REQUEST_CHANGES

• Reason: coverage-evidence result was failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head 2a7815de673b7dba6c98fa2e1151a98a4fd5dab4.

• Head SHA: 2a7815de673b7dba6c98fa2e1151a98a4fd5dab4

• Workflow run: 29555090452

• Workflow attempt: 1

Coverage evidence

Coverage Decision

• Result: FAIL
• Test evidence: not proven passing
• Docstring evidence: not proven passing when configured
• Failure count: 1

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file (2 files)"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (2 files)"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]

Loading

[opencode-agent]

OpenCode Review Overview

• Head SHA: 2a7815de673b7dba6c98fa2e1151a98a4fd5dab4
• Workflow run: 29555090452
• Workflow attempt: 1
• Gate result: REQUEST_CHANGES (approval step)

Pull request overview

OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.

Review outcome

1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence

• Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.

• Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.

• Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports success with required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.

• Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking needs.coverage-evidence.result == success before posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.

• Result: REQUEST_CHANGES

• Reason: coverage-evidence result was failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head 2a7815de673b7dba6c98fa2e1151a98a4fd5dab4.

• Head SHA: 2a7815de673b7dba6c98fa2e1151a98a4fd5dab4

• Workflow run: 29555090452

• Workflow attempt: 1

Coverage evidence

Coverage Decision

• Result: FAIL
• Test evidence: not proven passing
• Docstring evidence: not proven passing when configured
• Failure count: 1

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file (2 files)"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (2 files)"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]

Loading

[seonghobae]

중복 정리: report.py의 main:focus-visible 규칙 추가가 #167 과 동일합니다(#167 은 회귀 테스트 포함). #167 을 대표로 남기고 닫습니다.

배경: 2026-07-14 이후 조직 coverage-evidence 인프라 문제로 모든 PR이 REQUEST_CHANGES 상태였습니다(인프라 수정: ContextualWisdomLab/.github#611). 필요 시 재오픈 가능합니다.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[google-labs-jules]

중복 정리: report.py의 main:focus-visible 규칙 추가가 #167 과 동일합니다(#167 은 회귀 테스트 포함). #167 을 대표로 남기고 닫습니다.

배경: 2026-07-14 이후 조직 coverage-evidence 인프라 문제로 모든 PR이 REQUEST_CHANGES 상태였습니다(인프라 수정: ContextualWisdomLab/.github#611). 필요 시 재오픈 가능합니다.

---

Generated by Claude Code

Understood. Acknowledging that this work is now obsolete as it duplicates #167, and stopping work on this task.