server: change PD region label isolate level Histogram to Gauge #976
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Connor1996
reviewed
Mar 6, 2018
| if level == regionLabelLevel { | ||
| return | ||
| } | ||
| l.labelLevelCounter[level]-- |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
what if region was merged, so there is no heartbeat anymore, namely Observe will not be called. Maybe we should add a function which can delete all relative stats of merged region.
disksing
reviewed
Mar 6, 2018
| @@ -66,14 +66,13 @@ var ( | |||
| Help: "Status of the regions.", | |||
| }, []string{"type"}) | |||
|
|
|||
| regionLabelLevelHistogram = prometheus.NewHistogram( | |||
| prometheus.HistogramOpts{ | |||
| regionLabelLevelGauge = prometheus.NewGaugeVec( | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is it safe to change a metrics' type? Can prometheus handle it right? /cc @overvenus
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Gauge use pd_regions_label_level as metrics name, it's a base name in Histogram for three metrics with suffix "bucket","count" and "sum".They do not conflict./cc @overvenus
Connor1996
reviewed
Mar 7, 2018
server/cache.go
Outdated
| @@ -470,6 +470,11 @@ func (c *clusterInfo) handleRegionHeartbeat(region *core.RegionInfo) error { | |||
| } | |||
| } | |||
| } | |||
| if c.regionStats != nil { | |||
| for _, item := range overlaps { | |||
| c.regionStats.clearDefunctRegion(item.GetId()) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is there some way to call this function in RemoveRegion(), maybe other places will call the RemoveRegion() in the future
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think we should use less this method, otherwise, the logic is more confusing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I misunderstood, but now the statistics not belong to RegionsInfo, it also needs to know some stores information.
ti-chi-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 15, 2023
…1.11.1 in /tools/pd-tso-bench (#5990) ref #897, ref #962, ref #969, ref #974, ref #975, ref #976, ref #986, ref prometheus/client_golang#987, ref #987, ref #989, ref #998, ref #1013, ref #1014, ref #1025, ref #1028, ref #1031, ref #1043, ref #1055, ref #1075, ref #1091, ref #1094, ref #1102, ref #1103, ref #1118, ref #1146, ref #1148, ref #1150 Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
ti-chi-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 15, 2023
…1.11.1 in /tests/client (#5992) ref #897, ref #962, ref #969, ref #974, ref #975, ref #976, ref #986, ref #987, ref prometheus/client_golang#987, ref #989, ref #998, ref #1013, ref #1014, ref #1025, ref #1028, ref #1031, ref #1043, ref #1055, ref #1075, ref #1091, ref #1094, ref #1102, ref #1103, ref #1118, ref #1146, ref #1148, ref #1150, ref #4399 Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
ti-chi-bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 15, 2023
…1.11.1 in /tests/mcs (#5993) ref #897, ref #962, ref #969, ref #974, ref #975, ref #976, ref #986, ref #987, ref prometheus/client_golang#987, ref #989, ref #998, ref #1013, ref #1014, ref #1025, ref #1028, ref #1031, ref #1043, ref #1055, ref #1075, ref #1091, ref #1094, ref #1102, ref #1103, ref #1118, ref #1146, ref #1148, ref #1150, ref #4399 Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Ti Chi Robot <[email protected]>
ti-chi-bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 15, 2023
…1.11.1 in /client (#5991) ref #897, ref #962, ref #969, ref #974, ref #975, ref #976, ref #986, ref #987, ref prometheus/client_golang#987, ref #989, ref #998, ref #1013, ref #1014, ref #1025, ref #1028, ref #1031, ref #1043, ref #1055, ref #1075, ref #1091, ref #1094, ref #1102, ref #1103, ref #1118, ref #1146, ref #1148, ref #1150, ref #4399 Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Ti Chi Robot <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.