Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

server: fix frequent alloc id #1013

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 10, 2018
Merged

server: fix frequent alloc id #1013

merged 4 commits into from
Apr 10, 2018

Conversation

nolouch
Copy link
Contributor

@nolouch nolouch commented Apr 8, 2018

the balance region may alloc peer but do not produce operator.

Copy link
Member

@Connor1996 Connor1996 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ func (r *ReplicaChecker) Check(region *core.RegionInfo) *Operator {

// SelectBestReplacedPeerToAddReplica returns a new peer that to be used to replace the old peer and distinct score.
func (r *ReplicaChecker) SelectBestReplacedPeerToAddReplica(region *core.RegionInfo, oldPeer *metapb.Peer, filters ...Filter) *metapb.Peer {
storeID, _ := r.selectBestReplacementStore(region, oldPeer, filters...)
storeID, _ := r.SelectBestReplacementStore(region, oldPeer, filters...)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we can remove the function SelectBestReplacedPeerToAddReplica to prevent we misuse it later.

}
newPeer, err := r.cluster.AllocPeer(storeID)
if err != nil {
log.Info("alloc peer meet error:", err)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we can use log.Error.

@@ -228,6 +219,7 @@ func (r *ReplicaChecker) checkBestReplacement(region *core.RegionInfo) *Operator
}
newPeer, err := r.cluster.AllocPeer(storeID)
if err != nil {
log.Info("alloc peer meet error:", err)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ditto.

@nolouch
Copy link
Contributor Author

nolouch commented Apr 9, 2018

PTAL @disksing

@@ -154,6 +154,10 @@ func (s *balanceRegionScheduler) transferPeer(cluster schedule.Cluster, region *
schedulerCounter.WithLabelValues(s.GetName(), "skip").Inc()
return nil
}
newPeer, err := cluster.AllocPeer(storeID)
if err != nil {
schedulerCounter.WithLabelValues(s.GetName(), "no_peer").Inc()
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

return nil?

}
newPeer, err := r.cluster.AllocPeer(storeID)
if err != nil {
log.Error("alloc peer meet error:", err)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have a second thought here. It seems better to move the log into AllocPeer function.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah, I check that found has already printed.

Copy link
Contributor

@disksing disksing left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@disksing
Copy link
Contributor

/run-all-tests

@nolouch nolouch merged commit 3ea73bb into tikv:master Apr 10, 2018
@nolouch nolouch deleted the fix-alloc branch April 10, 2018 02:47
ti-chi-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 15, 2023
…1.11.1 in /tools/pd-tso-bench (#5990)

ref #897, ref #962, ref #969, ref #974, ref #975, ref #976, ref #986, ref prometheus/client_golang#987, ref #987, ref #989, ref #998, ref #1013, ref #1014, ref #1025, ref #1028, ref #1031, ref #1043, ref #1055, ref #1075, ref #1091, ref #1094, ref #1102, ref #1103, ref #1118, ref #1146, ref #1148, ref #1150

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>

Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
ti-chi-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 15, 2023
…1.11.1 in /tests/client (#5992)

ref #897, ref #962, ref #969, ref #974, ref #975, ref #976, ref #986, ref #987, ref prometheus/client_golang#987, ref #989, ref #998, ref #1013, ref #1014, ref #1025, ref #1028, ref #1031, ref #1043, ref #1055, ref #1075, ref #1091, ref #1094, ref #1102, ref #1103, ref #1118, ref #1146, ref #1148, ref #1150, ref #4399

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>

Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
ti-chi-bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 15, 2023
…1.11.1 in /tests/mcs (#5993)

ref #897, ref #962, ref #969, ref #974, ref #975, ref #976, ref #986, ref #987, ref prometheus/client_golang#987, ref #989, ref #998, ref #1013, ref #1014, ref #1025, ref #1028, ref #1031, ref #1043, ref #1055, ref #1075, ref #1091, ref #1094, ref #1102, ref #1103, ref #1118, ref #1146, ref #1148, ref #1150, ref #4399

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>

Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ti Chi Robot <[email protected]>
ti-chi-bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 15, 2023
…1.11.1 in /client (#5991)

ref #897, ref #962, ref #969, ref #974, ref #975, ref #976, ref #986, ref #987, ref prometheus/client_golang#987, ref #989, ref #998, ref #1013, ref #1014, ref #1025, ref #1028, ref #1031, ref #1043, ref #1055, ref #1075, ref #1091, ref #1094, ref #1102, ref #1103, ref #1118, ref #1146, ref #1148, ref #1150, ref #4399

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>

Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ti Chi Robot <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants