Skip to content

rustdoc_missing_doc_code_examples: lint on macro_rules macros#154696

Merged
rust-bors[bot] merged 2 commits intorust-lang:mainfrom
lolbinarycat:rustdoc-missing_doc_code_examples-macro_rules
Apr 3, 2026
Merged

rustdoc_missing_doc_code_examples: lint on macro_rules macros#154696
rust-bors[bot] merged 2 commits intorust-lang:mainfrom
lolbinarycat:rustdoc-missing_doc_code_examples-macro_rules

Conversation

@lolbinarycat
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@lolbinarycat lolbinarycat commented Apr 1, 2026

part of #154640

accidentally built this on top of #154644, but since that PR is already approved it should be fine if we just wait for it to be merged.

r? @GuillaumeGomez

@rustbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 1, 2026

Some changes occurred in GUI tests.

cc @GuillaumeGomez

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc-frontend Relevant to the rustdoc-frontend team, which will review and decide on the web UI/UX output. labels Apr 1, 2026
@lolbinarycat lolbinarycat changed the title Rustdoc missing doc code examples macro rules rustdoc_missing_doc_code_examples: lint on macro_rules macros Apr 1, 2026
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Looks good to me, thanks! r=me once first PR is merged and this one passes CI. ;)

@lolbinarycat lolbinarycat force-pushed the rustdoc-missing_doc_code_examples-macro_rules branch from 34e07d5 to 6fd96dd Compare April 1, 2026 21:06
@lolbinarycat
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@bors r=GuillaumeGomez

@rust-bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

rust-bors bot commented Apr 3, 2026

📌 Commit 6fd96dd has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@rust-bors rust-bors bot added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 3, 2026
rust-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 3, 2026
Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #154696 (rustdoc_missing_doc_code_examples: lint on macro_rules macros)
 - #154698 (Improve workings of the `desc` query modifier and custom query cycle handlers)
 - #154713 (Stop compiling when we get resolving crate failure)
 - #154736 (Add a regression test for the duplicated `crate` keyword in path suggestions)
 - #154739 (ci: update upload-artifact action to v7)
 - #154741 (Enforce `#![warn(unreachable_pub)]` in compiletest source)

Failed merges:

 - #154605 (Make `span_suggestions` always verbose)
@rust-bors rust-bors bot merged commit 7a74013 into rust-lang:main Apr 3, 2026
15 of 22 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.96.0 milestone Apr 3, 2026
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 3, 2026
Rollup merge of #154696 - lolbinarycat:rustdoc-missing_doc_code_examples-macro_rules, r=GuillaumeGomez

rustdoc_missing_doc_code_examples: lint on macro_rules macros

part of #154640

accidentally built this on top of #154644, but since that PR is already approved it should be fine if we just wait for it to be merged.

r? @GuillaumeGomez
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc-frontend Relevant to the rustdoc-frontend team, which will review and decide on the web UI/UX output.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants