Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make rustc_onunimplemented export path agnostic #116805

Conversation

Noratrieb
Copy link
Member

This makes it so that all the matchers that match against paths use the definition path instead of the export path. This removes all duplication around std/alloc/core.

This is not necessarily optimal because we now depend on internal implementation details like core::ops::control_flow::ControlFlow, which is not very nice and probably not acceptable for a stable on_unimplemented.

An alternative would be to just string-replace normalize away alloc/core to std as a special case, keeping the export paths but making it so that we're still fully standard library flavor agnostic.

Looking at the diff, I'm starting to think that some simple string replacement would go a long way towards fixing the problem of duplication while keeping export paths...

What do you prefer?

Also @weiznich for your thoughts about the stable version.

r? compiler-errors

This makes it so that all the matchers that match against paths use the
definition path instead of the export path. This removes all duplication
around `std`/`alloc`/`core`.

This is not necessarily optimal because we now depend on internal
implementation details like `core::ops::control_flow::ControlFlow`,
which is not very nice and probably not acceptable for a stable
`on_unimplemented`.

An alternative would be to just string-replace normalize away
`alloc`/`core` to `std` as a special case, keeping the export paths but
making it so that we're still fully standard library flavor agnostic.
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Oct 16, 2023
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

I think this makes sense, and I also think that at least for libstd/liballoc/libcore, using the definition path is the best to make sure we actually always match against the item we're looking for.

Since on_unimplemented actually lets you define multiple string matches per symbol, you could export both the visible path and the definition path for the purposes of the user-facing on_unimplemented?

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

r=me

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 16, 2023

📌 Commit 414135d has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 16, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2023
…llaumeGomez

Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#116754 (coverage: Several small cleanups in `spans`)
 - rust-lang#116798 (Improve display of parallel jobs in rustdoc-gui tester script)
 - rust-lang#116800 (Fix implied outlives check for GAT in RPITIT)
 - rust-lang#116805 (Make `rustc_onunimplemented` export path agnostic)
 - rust-lang#116808 (Add myself to smir triage)
 - rust-lang#116811 (Preserve unicode escapes in format string literals when pretty-printing AST)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 347f7f3 into rust-lang:master Oct 17, 2023
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.75.0 milestone Oct 17, 2023
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2023
Rollup merge of rust-lang#116805 - Nilstrieb:onunimplemented-std-core-alloc-whatever-who-cares, r=compiler-errors

Make `rustc_onunimplemented` export path agnostic

This makes it so that all the matchers that match against paths use the definition path instead of the export path. This removes all duplication around `std`/`alloc`/`core`.

This is not necessarily optimal because we now depend on internal implementation details like `core::ops::control_flow::ControlFlow`, which is not very nice and probably not acceptable for a stable `on_unimplemented`.

An alternative would be to just string-replace normalize away `alloc`/`core` to `std` as a special case, keeping the export paths but making it so that we're still fully standard library flavor agnostic.

Looking at the diff, I'm starting to think that some simple string replacement would go a long way towards fixing the problem of duplication while keeping export paths...

What do you prefer?

Also `@weiznich` for your thoughts about the stable version.

r? compiler-errors
@Noratrieb Noratrieb deleted the onunimplemented-std-core-alloc-whatever-who-cares branch October 17, 2023 07:00
@weiznich
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for pining me. I don't think this should affect a potential stable version of on_unimplemented. The RFC proposes a different syntax for that, based on using actual name resolution. In addition I personally would like to try to stabilize a minimal version first, which would not allow filters at all. So just message, label and note.

bors-ferrocene bot added a commit to ferrocene/ferrocene that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2023
54: Pull upstream master 2023 10 17 r=pietroalbini a=Veykril

* rust-lang/rust#116196
* rust-lang/rust#116824
* rust-lang/rust#116822
* rust-lang/rust#116477
* rust-lang/rust#116826
* rust-lang/rust#116820
  * rust-lang/rust#116811
  * rust-lang/rust#116808
  * rust-lang/rust#116805
  * rust-lang/rust#116800
  * rust-lang/rust#116798
  * rust-lang/rust#116754
* rust-lang/rust#114370
* rust-lang/rust#116804
  * rust-lang/rust#116802
  * rust-lang/rust#116790
  * rust-lang/rust#116786
  * rust-lang/rust#116709
  * rust-lang/rust#116430
  * rust-lang/rust#116257
  * rust-lang/rust#114157
* rust-lang/rust#116731
* rust-lang/rust#116550
* rust-lang/rust#114330
* rust-lang/rust#116724
* rust-lang/rust#116782
  * rust-lang/rust#116776
  * rust-lang/rust#115955
  * rust-lang/rust#115196
* rust-lang/rust#116775
* rust-lang/rust#114589
* rust-lang/rust#113747
* rust-lang/rust#116772
  * rust-lang/rust#116771
  * rust-lang/rust#116760
  * rust-lang/rust#116755
  * rust-lang/rust#116732
  * rust-lang/rust#116522
  * rust-lang/rust#116341
  * rust-lang/rust#116172
* rust-lang/rust#110604
* rust-lang/rust#110729
* rust-lang/rust#116527
* rust-lang/rust#116688
* rust-lang/rust#116757
  * rust-lang/rust#116753
  * rust-lang/rust#116748
  * rust-lang/rust#116741
  * rust-lang/rust#116594
* rust-lang/rust#116691
* rust-lang/rust#116643
* rust-lang/rust#116683
* rust-lang/rust#116635
* rust-lang/rust#115515
* rust-lang/rust#116742
  * rust-lang/rust#116661
  * rust-lang/rust#116576
  * rust-lang/rust#116540
* rust-lang/rust#116352
* rust-lang/rust#116737
  * rust-lang/rust#116730
  * rust-lang/rust#116723
  * rust-lang/rust#116715
  * rust-lang/rust#116603
  * rust-lang/rust#116591
  * rust-lang/rust#115439
* rust-lang/rust#116264
* rust-lang/rust#116727
  * rust-lang/rust#116704
  * rust-lang/rust#116696
  * rust-lang/rust#116695
  * rust-lang/rust#116644
  * rust-lang/rust#116630
* rust-lang/rust#116728
  * rust-lang/rust#116689
  * rust-lang/rust#116679
  * rust-lang/rust#116618
  * rust-lang/rust#116577
  * rust-lang/rust#115653
* rust-lang/rust#116702
* rust-lang/rust#116015
* rust-lang/rust#115822
* rust-lang/rust#116407
* rust-lang/rust#115719
* rust-lang/rust#115524
* rust-lang/rust#116705
* rust-lang/rust#116645
* rust-lang/rust#116233
* rust-lang/rust#115108
* rust-lang/rust#116670
* rust-lang/rust#116676
* rust-lang/rust#116666



Co-authored-by: Benoît du Garreau <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Colin Finck <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ian Jackson <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Joshua Liebow-Feeser <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: León Orell Valerian Liehr <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Trevor Gross <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Evan Merlock <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: joboet <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ralf Jung <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: DaniPopes <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Mark Rousskov <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: onur-ozkan <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Nicholas Nethercote <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: The 8472 <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Samuel Thibault <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: reez12g <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jakub Beránek <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants