Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't accidentally detect the commit hash as an fadd instruction #116591

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 14, 2023

Conversation

Zalathar
Copy link
Contributor

I've seen some reports of tests/codegen/target-feature-inline-closure.rs spuriously failing because it thinks the hash in the rustc version number contains an fadd instruction.

#116085 (comment)
https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/Is.20.60tests.2Fcodegen.2Ftarget-feature-inline-closure.2Ers.60.20flakey
https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/Strange.20.5Cn.20in.20output.20of.20assert.20.23108341/near/395811335

This PR tries to make that not happen by adding a CHECK-LABEL directive that will match the line with the rustc version string, preventing the previous CHECK-NOT from seeing it.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Oct 10, 2023

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Oct 10, 2023
@Zalathar
Copy link
Contributor Author

There may be a more principled or universal way to achieve this, so I'm open to suggestions.

It's a little hard to properly test that this change actually works (especially since I'm not even on x86_64), but locally I did rig up another test to deliberately fail in a similar way, and this does seem to do the trick.

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

I'm happy to land this.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 14, 2023

📌 Commit 58d62fc has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 14, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#115439 (rustdoc: hide `#[repr(transparent)]` if it isn't part of the public ABI)
 - rust-lang#116591 (Don't accidentally detect the commit hash as an `fadd` instruction)
 - rust-lang#116603 (Reorganize `bootstrap/Cargo.toml`)
 - rust-lang#116715 (Prevent more spurious unreachable pattern lints)
 - rust-lang#116723 (Fix broken build on ESP-IDF caused by rust-lang#115108)
 - rust-lang#116730 (Add some unsoundness tests for opaques capturing hidden regions not in substs)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit a8cda30 into rust-lang:master Oct 14, 2023
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.75.0 milestone Oct 14, 2023
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2023
Rollup merge of rust-lang#116591 - Zalathar:flaky-hash, r=Mark-Simulacrum

Don't accidentally detect the commit hash as an `fadd` instruction

I've seen some reports of `tests/codegen/target-feature-inline-closure.rs` spuriously failing because it thinks the hash in the rustc version number contains an `fadd` instruction.

rust-lang#116085 (comment)
https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/Is.20.60tests.2Fcodegen.2Ftarget-feature-inline-closure.2Ers.60.20flakey
https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/Strange.20.5Cn.20in.20output.20of.20assert.20.23108341/near/395811335

This PR tries to make that not happen by adding a `CHECK-LABEL` directive that will match the line with the rustc version string, preventing the previous `CHECK-NOT` from seeing it.
@Zalathar Zalathar deleted the flaky-hash branch October 14, 2023 21:51
bors-ferrocene bot added a commit to ferrocene/ferrocene that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2023
54: Pull upstream master 2023 10 17 r=pietroalbini a=Veykril

* rust-lang/rust#116196
* rust-lang/rust#116824
* rust-lang/rust#116822
* rust-lang/rust#116477
* rust-lang/rust#116826
* rust-lang/rust#116820
  * rust-lang/rust#116811
  * rust-lang/rust#116808
  * rust-lang/rust#116805
  * rust-lang/rust#116800
  * rust-lang/rust#116798
  * rust-lang/rust#116754
* rust-lang/rust#114370
* rust-lang/rust#116804
  * rust-lang/rust#116802
  * rust-lang/rust#116790
  * rust-lang/rust#116786
  * rust-lang/rust#116709
  * rust-lang/rust#116430
  * rust-lang/rust#116257
  * rust-lang/rust#114157
* rust-lang/rust#116731
* rust-lang/rust#116550
* rust-lang/rust#114330
* rust-lang/rust#116724
* rust-lang/rust#116782
  * rust-lang/rust#116776
  * rust-lang/rust#115955
  * rust-lang/rust#115196
* rust-lang/rust#116775
* rust-lang/rust#114589
* rust-lang/rust#113747
* rust-lang/rust#116772
  * rust-lang/rust#116771
  * rust-lang/rust#116760
  * rust-lang/rust#116755
  * rust-lang/rust#116732
  * rust-lang/rust#116522
  * rust-lang/rust#116341
  * rust-lang/rust#116172
* rust-lang/rust#110604
* rust-lang/rust#110729
* rust-lang/rust#116527
* rust-lang/rust#116688
* rust-lang/rust#116757
  * rust-lang/rust#116753
  * rust-lang/rust#116748
  * rust-lang/rust#116741
  * rust-lang/rust#116594
* rust-lang/rust#116691
* rust-lang/rust#116643
* rust-lang/rust#116683
* rust-lang/rust#116635
* rust-lang/rust#115515
* rust-lang/rust#116742
  * rust-lang/rust#116661
  * rust-lang/rust#116576
  * rust-lang/rust#116540
* rust-lang/rust#116352
* rust-lang/rust#116737
  * rust-lang/rust#116730
  * rust-lang/rust#116723
  * rust-lang/rust#116715
  * rust-lang/rust#116603
  * rust-lang/rust#116591
  * rust-lang/rust#115439
* rust-lang/rust#116264
* rust-lang/rust#116727
  * rust-lang/rust#116704
  * rust-lang/rust#116696
  * rust-lang/rust#116695
  * rust-lang/rust#116644
  * rust-lang/rust#116630
* rust-lang/rust#116728
  * rust-lang/rust#116689
  * rust-lang/rust#116679
  * rust-lang/rust#116618
  * rust-lang/rust#116577
  * rust-lang/rust#115653
* rust-lang/rust#116702
* rust-lang/rust#116015
* rust-lang/rust#115822
* rust-lang/rust#116407
* rust-lang/rust#115719
* rust-lang/rust#115524
* rust-lang/rust#116705
* rust-lang/rust#116645
* rust-lang/rust#116233
* rust-lang/rust#115108
* rust-lang/rust#116670
* rust-lang/rust#116676
* rust-lang/rust#116666



Co-authored-by: Benoît du Garreau <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Colin Finck <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ian Jackson <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Joshua Liebow-Feeser <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: León Orell Valerian Liehr <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Trevor Gross <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Evan Merlock <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: joboet <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ralf Jung <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: DaniPopes <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Mark Rousskov <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: onur-ozkan <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Nicholas Nethercote <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: The 8472 <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Samuel Thibault <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: reez12g <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jakub Beránek <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants