Skip to content

Conversation

@wking
Copy link
Member

@wking wking commented Jul 9, 2018

These were added in 15394f8 (coreos/tectonic-installer#1444), but we returned to upstream Terraform in all cases in 379fd19 (coreos/tectonic-installer#2041). Remove the stale docs.

@coreosbot
Copy link

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

These were added in 15394f8 (tests: Add upstream terraform trigger,
2017-07-21, coreos/tectonic-installer#1444), but we returned to
upstream Terraform in all cases in 379fd19 (Bump Terraform to 0.10.7,
2017-10-04, coreos/tectonic-installer#2041).  Remove the stale docs.
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 9, 2018
@wking wking force-pushed the drop-TERRAFORM_URL branch from f7b9cc0 to 7a58339 Compare July 9, 2018 02:55
@squat
Copy link
Contributor

squat commented Jul 9, 2018

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 9, 2018
@squat
Copy link
Contributor

squat commented Jul 9, 2018

/ok-to-test

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Jul 9, 2018
@wking
Copy link
Member Author

wking commented Jul 9, 2018

The e2e-aws errors look like these.

@stevekuznetsov
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@wking
Copy link
Member Author

wking commented Jul 9, 2018

All green :).

@wking
Copy link
Member Author

wking commented Jul 10, 2018

Grr. For some reason this has un-greened itself, and now e2e-aws is mad. I'd guess at least some of the 31 failures (!) are cascading from the first:

BeforeSuite 1m10s
go run hack/e2e.go -v -test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=BeforeSuite$'
/tmp/openshift/build-rpms/rpm/BUILD/origin-3.11.0/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/e2e.go:140
Expected error:
    <*url.Error | 0xc4213a7cb0>: {
        Op: "Get",
        URL: "https://ci-op-5kjc6bg0-68485-api.origin-ci-int-aws.dev.rhcloud.com:6443/api/v1/nodes?fieldSelector=spec.unschedulable%3Dfalse&resourceVersion=0",
        Err: {},
    }
    Get https://ci-op-5kjc6bg0-68485-api.origin-ci-int-aws.dev.rhcloud.com:6443/api/v1/nodes?fieldSelector=spec.unschedulable%3Dfalse&resourceVersion=0: net/http: TLS handshake timeout
not to have occurred
/tmp/openshift/build-rpms/rpm/BUILD/origin-3.11.0/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/e2e.go:178

Maybe a networking hiccup?

@stevekuznetsov
Copy link
Contributor

/skip

@yifan-gu
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@wking
Copy link
Member Author

wking commented Jul 20, 2018

The e2e-aws error was:

Waiting for router to be created ...
Waiting for API at https://ci-op-c35fpz2s-68485-api.origin-ci-int-aws.dev.rhcloud.com:6443 to respond ...
... lots of copies of that line...
Waiting for API at https://ci-op-c35fpz2s-68485-api.origin-ci-int-aws.dev.rhcloud.com:6443 to respond ...
Interrupted
2018/07/20 22:29:48 Container setup in pod e2e-aws failed, exit code 1, reason Error

The summary was:

operator Instantiate the template e2e-aws into the operator namespace and wait for any pods to complete 2h11m

go run hack/e2e.go -v -test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=operator\sInstantiate\sthe\stemplate\se2e\-aws\sinto\sthe\soperator\snamespace\sand\swait\sfor\sany\spods\sto\scomplete$'

the pod ci-op-c35fpz2s/e2e-aws failed after 2h11m2s (failed containers: setup, test):  unknown

Container setup exited with code 1, reason Error
Container test exited with code 1, reason Error

@wking
Copy link
Member Author

wking commented Jul 25, 2018

/retest

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants