Skip to content

Bug 2033720: Bump k8 dependencies to v0.23.1#409

Merged
openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
dperaza4dustbit:bump_k8_dependencies
Jan 20, 2022
Merged

Bug 2033720: Bump k8 dependencies to v0.23.1#409
openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
dperaza4dustbit:bump_k8_dependencies

Conversation

@dperaza4dustbit
Copy link
Contributor

Signed-off-by: David Peraza dperaza@redhat.com

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 19, 2022
@gabemontero
Copy link
Contributor

this will need openshift/release#25443 for the compile to work in CI

k8s.io/client-go v0.23.1
)

require (
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I tried the bump locally and did not need all this require stuff @dperaza4dustbit

remove it and re-run go mod tidy then go mod vendor

if for some reason you can't do this on your Mac without this, then I'll submit an alternative PR

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Did you move go to 1.7 at the top of go.mod?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yep your are right @dperaza4dustbit

and now looking at it again, I see it now does 1 require blocks ... the top one with direct dependencies and the bottom one with indirect one

let's leave as is and retest after merging the release PRs

@gabemontero
Copy link
Contributor

ok master branch ocp is now golang 1.17 ... let's see

/retest

@gabemontero
Copy link
Contributor

still built with 1.16 ... may have retest too soon where the changes were not pushed everywhere needed

let's wait a bit, then try again

@dperaza4dustbit dperaza4dustbit changed the title Bump k8 dependencies to v0.23.1 Bug 2033720: Bump k8 dependencies to v0.23.1 Jan 19, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jan 19, 2022
@gabemontero
Copy link
Contributor

/test images

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 19, 2022

@dperaza4dustbit: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2033720, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.10.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.10.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @jitendar-singh

Details

In response to this:

Bug 2033720: Bump k8 dependencies to v0.23.1

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from jitendar-singh January 19, 2022 20:49
@gabemontero
Copy link
Contributor

/label docs-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the docs-approved Signifies that Docs has signed off on this PR label Jan 19, 2022
@gabemontero
Copy link
Contributor

/label px-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the px-approved Signifies that Product Support has signed off on this PR label Jan 19, 2022
@gabemontero
Copy link
Contributor

@dperaza4dustbit if the images job fails again with it still using golang 1.16 we may have to change the Dockerfiles as well to get things to work (didn't think that was necessary but something might have changed)

@gabemontero
Copy link
Contributor

@dperaza4dustbit if the images job fails again with it still using golang 1.16 we may have to change the Dockerfiles as well to get things to work (didn't think that was necessary but something might have changed)

hmm did it again ... I'm confused, given the rehearsals passed ... still may be a slow CI sync

that said, updating the Dockerfiles for local development is a good idea @dperaza4dustbit ... go ahead and update them in a separate commit

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
FROM registry.svc.ci.openshift.org/openshift/release:golang-1.16 AS builder
FROM registry.ci.openshift.org/openshift/release:golang-1.17 AS builder
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you need to change line 6 below too

FROM registry.ci.openshift.org/origin/4.10:base

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if the e2e's stay green I'll handle this in a separate PR

@gabemontero
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@gabemontero
Copy link
Contributor

PR e2e's are sufficient testing

/label qe-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR label Jan 20, 2022
@gabemontero
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 20, 2022
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@gabemontero
Copy link
Contributor

/skip

@gabemontero
Copy link
Contributor

/test unit

@gabemontero
Copy link
Contributor

/hold

@dperaza4dustbit and I are investigating

looks like the unit test still wants to run golang 1.16 for some reason

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 20, 2022
@gabemontero
Copy link
Contributor

/test unit

@yselkowitz
Copy link
Contributor

Note that #403 already exists to move to go1.17

@gabemontero
Copy link
Contributor

/test unit

see if we can get by without #403 where we just manually updated openshift/release (but their bot has not reverted us)

@gabemontero
Copy link
Contributor

/skip

@gabemontero
Copy link
Contributor

/test e2e-aws-operator

@gabemontero
Copy link
Contributor

/test unit

@gabemontero
Copy link
Contributor

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 20, 2022
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Signed-off-by: David Peraza <dperaza@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 20, 2022
@gabemontero
Copy link
Contributor

/skip

@gabemontero
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 20, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 20, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dperaza4dustbit, gabemontero

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [dperaza4dustbit,gabemontero]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@gabemontero
Copy link
Contributor

AWS fail

/test e2e-aws-image-ecosystem

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit a7325a6 into openshift:master Jan 20, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 20, 2022

@dperaza4dustbit: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 2033720 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 2033720: Bump k8 dependencies to v0.23.1

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 20, 2022

@dperaza4dustbit: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/okd-e2e-aws-image-ecosystem 5b61623 link false /test okd-e2e-aws-image-ecosystem
ci/prow/e2e-aws-proxy 5b61623 link false /test e2e-aws-proxy
ci/prow/okd-e2e-aws 5b61623 link false /test okd-e2e-aws
ci/prow/okd-e2e-aws-upgrade 5b61623 link false /test okd-e2e-aws-upgrade

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. docs-approved Signifies that Docs has signed off on this PR lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. px-approved Signifies that Product Support has signed off on this PR qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

Comments