Skip to content

OCPBUGS-29476: manifests-gen: store core capi crds also in their own manifest#159

Merged
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
damdo:manifests-gen-core-capi-crds-apply-by-cvo
Feb 15, 2024
Merged

OCPBUGS-29476: manifests-gen: store core capi crds also in their own manifest#159
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
damdo:manifests-gen-core-capi-crds-apply-by-cvo

Conversation

@damdo
Copy link
Member

@damdo damdo commented Feb 14, 2024

Store Core CAPI CRDs also in their own manifest to get them applied by CVO directly. We want these to be installed independently from whether the cluster-capi-operator is enabled, as other Openshift components rely on them.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from elmiko and racheljpg February 14, 2024 12:26
Copy link
Contributor

@JoelSpeed JoelSpeed left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Discussed on call, would like to make sure we don't duplicate the CRDs between the manifests generically and the transport configmaps, we don't want CVO and CCO fighting over the two manifests

Store Core CAPI CRDs in their own manifest to get them applied by CVO directly.
We want these to be installed independently from whether the cluster-capi-operator is enabled,
as other Openshift components rely on them.
@damdo damdo force-pushed the manifests-gen-core-capi-crds-apply-by-cvo branch from 7af50b0 to 59ddd52 Compare February 14, 2024 15:38
@damdo
Copy link
Member Author

damdo commented Feb 14, 2024

@JoelSpeed now updated to store CRDs only in transport ConfigMap or in their own plain manifest.

Result can be seen here: https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api/pull/195/files

Copy link
Contributor

@JoelSpeed JoelSpeed left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 14, 2024
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 14, 2024

@damdo: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@damdo damdo changed the title manifests-gen: store core capi crds also in their own manifest OCPBUGS-29476: manifests-gen: store core capi crds also in their own manifest Feb 14, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Feb 14, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@damdo: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-29476, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.16.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Store Core CAPI CRDs also in their own manifest to get them applied by CVO directly. We want these to be installed independently from whether the cluster-capi-operator is enabled, as other Openshift components rely on them.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Feb 14, 2024
@damdo
Copy link
Member Author

damdo commented Feb 14, 2024

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@damdo: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-29476, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.16.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@damdo
Copy link
Member Author

damdo commented Feb 14, 2024

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Feb 14, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@damdo: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-29476, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.16.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.16.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @sunzhaohua2

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Feb 14, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from sunzhaohua2 February 14, 2024 18:42
@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 15, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: JoelSpeed

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 15, 2024
@theobarberbany
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit dca27d1 into openshift:main Feb 15, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@damdo: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-29476: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

The following pull requests linked via external trackers have not merged:

These pull request must merge or be unlinked from the Jira bug in order for it to move to the next state. Once unlinked, request a bug refresh with /jira refresh.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-29476 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Store Core CAPI CRDs also in their own manifest to get them applied by CVO directly. We want these to be installed independently from whether the cluster-capi-operator is enabled, as other Openshift components rely on them.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@damdo
Copy link
Member Author

damdo commented Feb 15, 2024

/cherry-pick release-4.15

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@damdo: new pull request created: #160

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.15

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

This PR has been included in build ose-cluster-capi-operator-container-v4.16.0-202402151410.p0.gdca27d1.assembly.stream.el9 for distgit ose-cluster-capi-operator.
All builds following this will include this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants