OCPBUGS-29476: manifests-gen: store core capi crds also in their own manifest#159
Conversation
JoelSpeed
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Discussed on call, would like to make sure we don't duplicate the CRDs between the manifests generically and the transport configmaps, we don't want CVO and CCO fighting over the two manifests
Store Core CAPI CRDs in their own manifest to get them applied by CVO directly. We want these to be installed independently from whether the cluster-capi-operator is enabled, as other Openshift components rely on them.
7af50b0 to
59ddd52
Compare
|
@JoelSpeed now updated to store CRDs only in transport ConfigMap or in their own plain manifest. Result can be seen here: https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api/pull/195/files |
|
@damdo: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
@damdo: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-29476, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@damdo: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-29476, which is invalid:
Comment DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@damdo: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-29476, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: JoelSpeed The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/lgtm |
|
@damdo: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-29476: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: The following pull requests linked via external trackers have not merged:
These pull request must merge or be unlinked from the Jira bug in order for it to move to the next state. Once unlinked, request a bug refresh with Jira Issue OCPBUGS-29476 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/cherry-pick release-4.15 |
|
@damdo: new pull request created: #160 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] This PR has been included in build ose-cluster-capi-operator-container-v4.16.0-202402151410.p0.gdca27d1.assembly.stream.el9 for distgit ose-cluster-capi-operator. |
Store Core CAPI CRDs also in their own manifest to get them applied by CVO directly. We want these to be installed independently from whether the cluster-capi-operator is enabled, as other Openshift components rely on them.