Skip to content

Conversation

@enj
Copy link
Contributor

@enj enj commented Feb 4, 2019

Delete operator 1

This is the minimal change to remove operator 1. It does not attempt to update operator 2 to remove the "2" or make other cosmetic changes.

Signed-off-by: Monis Khan mkhan@redhat.com


Set operator 2 to Managed

Since operator 1 is gone, operator 2 needs to run by default to allow kube:admin to work.

Signed-off-by: Monis Khan mkhan@redhat.com


/hold

We need the router fixes for this to work. The kube:admin test should fail and prevent this from merging until then.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 4, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 4, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@ericavonb ericavonb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 4, 2019
@enj
Copy link
Contributor Author

enj commented Feb 5, 2019

fail [github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/bootstrap_user/bootstrap_user_login.go:52]: Expected error:
    <*util.ExitError | 0xc42293ec60>: {
        Cmd: "oc login --config=/tmp/configfile618696739 --namespace=e2e-test-bootstrap-login-vs8pt -u kubeadmin -p qs83sHr1AzvftWmAw1vWR5yaJX5z9BXWAPoXjMhvfaw",
        StdErr: "error: x509: certificate signed by unknown authority",
        ExitError: {
            ProcessState: {
                pid: 15025,
                status: 256,
                rusage: {
                    Utime: {Sec: 0, Usec: 226357},
                    Stime: {Sec: 0, Usec: 59447},
                    Maxrss: 95120,
                    Ixrss: 0,
                    Idrss: 0,
                    Isrss: 0,
                    Minflt: 15167,
                    Majflt: 0,
                    Nswap: 0,
                    Inblock: 0,
                    Oublock: 0,
                    Msgsnd: 0,
                    Msgrcv: 0,
                    Nsignals: 0,
                    Nvcsw: 1094,
                    Nivcsw: 1,
                },
            },
            Stderr: nil,
        },
    }
    exit status 1
not to have occurred

@sallyom look! A test that catches regressions! It is annoying that the password gets logged though 😑

@enj
Copy link
Contributor Author

enj commented Feb 6, 2019

/retest

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 6, 2019
@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Feb 6, 2019

/retest

@stlaz
Copy link
Contributor

stlaz commented Feb 12, 2019

/hold cancel
The routes were fixed.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 12, 2019
@derekwaynecarr
Copy link
Member

/retest

@stlaz
Copy link
Contributor

stlaz commented Feb 13, 2019

Currently blocked by openshift/installer#1242

@abhinavdahiya
Copy link
Contributor

Currently blocked by openshift/installer#1242
openshift/installer#1242 merged

@ericavonb
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@abhinavdahiya
Copy link
Contributor

https://openshift-gce-devel.appspot.com/build/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/openshift_cluster-authentication-operator/59/pull-ci-openshift-cluster-authentication-operator-master-e2e-aws/260/
seems stuck in running with no progress...

/test e2e-aws

@ericavonb
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 15, 2019
@abhinavdahiya
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@derekwaynecarr
Copy link
Member

/test e2e-aws

1 similar comment
@nee1esh
Copy link

nee1esh commented Feb 17, 2019

/test e2e-aws

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Feb 17, 2019
enj added 2 commits February 18, 2019 06:50
This is the minimal change to remove operator 1.  It does not
attempt to update operator 2 to remove the "2" or make other
cosmetic changes.

Signed-off-by: Monis Khan <mkhan@redhat.com>
Since operator 1 is gone, operator 2 needs to run by default to
allow kube:admin to work.

Signed-off-by: Monis Khan <mkhan@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Feb 18, 2019
@enj enj mentioned this pull request Feb 18, 2019
@ericavonb
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@ericavonb
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 18, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: enj, ericavonb

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit f62d700 into openshift:master Feb 18, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants