Skip to content

Conversation

@joepvd
Copy link
Contributor

@joepvd joepvd commented Apr 8, 2020

No description provided.

@wking
Copy link
Member

wking commented Apr 8, 2020

/hold

Blocked on #162 and cook time.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Apr 8, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Apr 14, 2020
@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented Apr 15, 2020

/assign @wking
OTA monitor when the 24-48hr fast-to-stable delay ends

@wking
Copy link
Member

wking commented Apr 15, 2020

It was promoted the feeders fast-4.2 and fast-4.3 by 3363c5e (Merge pull request #162 from joepvd/4.2.28-fast, 2020-04-14), so cook time has elapsed. Nothing newly concerning in Telemetry/Insights, so off we go:

/lgtm
/retest

@wking
Copy link
Member

wking commented Apr 15, 2020

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. and removed do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. labels Apr 15, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: joepvd, wking

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 15, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 752c373 into openshift:master Apr 15, 2020
wking added a commit to wking/cincinnati-graph-data that referenced this pull request Jul 1, 2020
…f arch

They went into candidate without architecture qualifiers in 0157b7b
(Merge pull request openshift#229 from sosiouxme/patch-5, 2020-05-08) with an
explicit decision to go multi-arch in db17a23 (candidate-4.3: allow
multi-arch 4.2 s390x upgrades, 2020-05-05, openshift#229).  But for some reason
had arch guards when they went into fast with cb27d43 (Add 4.2.28
to fast, 2020-04-08, openshift#162) and 9d10713 (Add 4.2.29 to fast,
2020-04-15, openshift#178) and stable with 74b433b (Add 4.2.28 to stable,
2020-04-08, openshift#163) f652963 (Add 4.2.29 to stable, 2020-04-15, openshift#179).
wking added a commit to wking/cincinnati-graph-data that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2021
…f arch

They went into candidate without architecture qualifiers in 0157b7b
(Merge pull request openshift#229 from sosiouxme/patch-5, 2020-05-08) with an
explicit decision to go multi-arch in db17a23 (candidate-4.3: allow
multi-arch 4.2 s390x upgrades, 2020-05-05, openshift#229).  But for some reason
had arch guards when they went into fast with cb27d43 (Add 4.2.28
to fast, 2020-04-08, openshift#162) and 9d10713 (Add 4.2.29 to fast,
2020-04-15, openshift#178) and stable with 74b433b (Add 4.2.28 to stable,
2020-04-08, openshift#163) f652963 (Add 4.2.29 to stable, 2020-04-15, openshift#179).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants