Skip to content

OCPBUGS-58156: Remove operators from OVE UI#3021

Merged
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intoopenshift-assisted:masterfrom
rawagner:remove_operators
Jun 27, 2025
Merged

OCPBUGS-58156: Remove operators from OVE UI#3021
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intoopenshift-assisted:masterfrom
rawagner:remove_operators

Conversation

@rawagner
Copy link
Member

@rawagner rawagner commented Jun 26, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Updated the set of available single cluster operators by removing three specific operators.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 26, 2025

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jun 26, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jun 26, 2025
@rawagner rawagner marked this pull request as ready for review June 26, 2025 14:04
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jun 26, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@rawagner: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-58156, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. and removed do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. labels Jun 26, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from batzionb and jgyselov June 26, 2025 14:04
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 26, 2025
@rawagner
Copy link
Member Author

/cherry-pick release-4.19

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@rawagner: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.19 in a new PR and assign it to you.

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.19

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 26, 2025

Walkthrough

This change updates the singleClusterOperators array in the constants configuration file by removing three operator constants. No other code, logic, or exports are affected by this modification.

Changes

File(s) Summary
libs/ui-lib/lib/common/config/constants.ts Removed three operator constants from singleClusterOperators array

Sequence Diagram(s)

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

lgtm

Suggested reviewers

  • ammont82

Poem

Three operators hop away,
From the cluster field today.
Constants trimmed with gentle care,
Leaving only those meant to be there.
The code is light, the path is clear—
A rabbit’s work brings tidy cheer! 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4355174 and e4fb5df.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • libs/ui-lib/lib/common/config/constants.ts (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • libs/ui-lib/lib/common/config/constants.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)
  • GitHub Check: tests
  • GitHub Check: circular-deps
  • GitHub Check: translation-files
  • GitHub Check: unit-tests
  • GitHub Check: format
  • GitHub Check: lint
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rawagner
Copy link
Member Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@rawagner: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-58156, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@rawagner
Copy link
Member Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jun 27, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@rawagner: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-58156, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.20.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.20.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @mhanss

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 27, 2025

@openshift-ci-robot: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: mhanss.

Note that only openshift-assisted members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

Details

In response to this:

@rawagner: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-58156, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.20.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.20.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @mhanss

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 27, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 27, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jgyselov, rawagner

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 99af211 into openshift-assisted:master Jun 27, 2025
18 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@rawagner: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-58156: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-58156 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
  • Updated the set of available single cluster operators by removing three specific operators.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@rawagner: new pull request created: #3022

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.19

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants