-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 378
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
When assignee rejects review secretary gets to see same review twice. #3211
Comments
@[email protected] uploaded file |
@[email protected] uploaded file |
@[email protected] changed status from |
The attachments for these issues were lost in trac before the transition to github, and cannot be recovered. If the issue is still relevant, and the attachments can be reconstructed, please add them as new comments. |
@kivinen ☝️ (with apologies) |
Good thing I do not clean up my temp directories too often so the old
images are still there...
…--
***@***.***
|
I actually found out that this happens when the document is still considered to be auto assignment, i.e., it lists the review that was rejected, and then when finding out new documents that should be assigned it does not filter out those review requests that are already on the list. Also if you do the assignment of the rejected review request first, then you can close the another one without affecting the other one. |
in question, ignore the automatic suggestion for that document. Fixes ietf-tools#3211.
…eady has review request (fixes #3211) (#5425) * Added check that if there is already review request for the document in question, ignore the automatic suggestion for that document. Fixes #3211. * fix: dont block on open requests for a previous version. Add tests --------- Co-authored-by: Nicolas Giard <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Robert Sparks <[email protected]>
* chore: Remove unused "rendertest" stuff (#6015) * fix: restore ability to create status change documents (#5963) * fix: restore ability to create status change documents Fixes #5962 * chore: address review comment * fix: Provide human-friendly status in submission status API response (#6011) Co-authored-by: nectostr <[email protected]> * fix: Make name/email lookups case-insensitive (#5972) (#6007) * fix: Make name/email lookups case-insensitive (#5972) Use icontains so that looking up name or email is case insensitive Added a test Fixes: 5972 * fix: Use __iexact not __icontains * fix: Clarify no-action-needed (#5918) (#6020) When a draft is submitted for manual processing, clarify that no action is needed; the Secretariat has the next steps. Fixes: #5918 * fix: Fix menu hover issue (#6019) * fix: Fix menu hover issue Fixes #5702 * Fix leftmenu hover issue * fix: Server error from api_get_session_materials() (#6025) Fixes #5877 * fix: Clarify Questionnaire label (#4688) (#6017) When filtering nominees, `Questionnaire` implies `Accepted == yes` so fix the dropdown test tosay that. Fixes: #4688 * chore: Merge from @martinthomson's rfc-txt-html (#6023) * fix:no history entry when changing RFC Editor note for doc (#6021) * fix:no history entry when changing RFC Editor note for doc * fix:no history entry when changing RFC Editor note for doc --------- Co-authored-by: Priyanka Narkar <[email protected]> * fix: avoid deprecation warning on view_list() for objs without CommunityList Fixes #5942 * fix: return 404 for non-existing revisions (#6014) * fix: return 404 for non-existing revisions Links to non-existing revisions to docs should return 404 * fix: change rfc/rev and search behaviour * refactor: fix tab level * fix: return 404 for rfc revision for bibtex * fix: provide date for revisions in bibtex output (#6029) * fix: provide date for revisions in bibtex output * refactor: change walrus to if's * fix: specify particular revision for events * fix: review refactoring issue fixes #5447 * fix: Remove automatically suggested document for document that is already has review request (fixes #3211) (#5425) * Added check that if there is already review request for the document in question, ignore the automatic suggestion for that document. Fixes #3211. * fix: dont block on open requests for a previous version. Add tests --------- Co-authored-by: Nicolas Giard <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Robert Sparks <[email protected]> * feat: IAB statements (#5940) * feat: support iab and iesg statements. Import iab statements. (#5895) * feat: infrastructure for statements doctype * chore: basic test framework * feat: basic statement document view * feat: show replaced statements * chore: black * fix: state help for statements * fix: cleanout non-relevant email expansions * feat: import iab statements, provide group statements tab * fix: guard against running import twice * feat: build redirect csv for iab statements * fix: set document state on import * feat: show published date on main doc view * feat: handle pdf statements * feat: create new and update statements * chore: copyright block updates * chore: remove flakes * chore: black * feat: add edit/new buttons for the secretariat * fix: address PR #5895 review comments * fix: pin pydantic until inflect catches up (#5901) (#5902) * chore: re-un-pin pydantic * feat: include submitter in email about submitted slides (#6033) * feat: include submitter in email about submitted slides fixes #6031 * chore: remove unintended whitespace change * chore(dev): update .vscode/settings.json with new taskExplorer settings * fix: Add editorial stream to proceedings (#6027) * fix: Add editorial stream to proceedings Fixes #5717 * fix: Move editorial stream after the irtf in proceedings * fix: Add editorial stream to meeting materials (#6047) Fixes #6042 * fix: Shows requested reviews for doc fixes (#6022) * Fix: Shows requested reviews for doc * Changed template includes to only give required variables to them. * feat: allow openId to choose an unactive email if there are none active (#6041) * feat: allow openId to choose an unactive email if there are no active ones * chore: correct typo * chore: rename unactive to inactive * fix: Make review table more responsive (#6053) * fix: Improve layout of review table * Progress * Progress * Final changes * Fix tests * Remove fluff * Undo commits * ci: add --validate-html-harder to tests * ci: add --validate-html-harder to build.yml workflow * fix: Set colspan to actual number of columns (#6069) * fix: Clean up view_feedback_pending (#6070) - Remove "Unclassified" column header, which caused misalignment in the table body. - Show the message author - previously displayed as `(None)`. * docs: Update LICENSE year * fix: Remove IESG state edit button when state is 'dead' (#6051) (#6065) * fix: Correctly order "last call requested" column in the IESG dashboard (#6079) * ci: update dev sandbox init script to start memcached * feat: Reclassify nomcom feedback (#6002) * fix: Clean up view_feedback_pending - Remove "Unclassified" column header, which caused misalignment in the table body. - Show the message author - previously displayed as `(None)`. * feat: Reclassify nomcom feedback (#4669) - There's a new `Chair/Advisor Tasks` menu item `Reclassify feedback`. - I overloaded `view_feedback*` URLs with a `?reclassify` parameter. - This adds a checkbox to each feedback message, and a `Reclassify` button at the bottom of each feedback page. - "Reclassifying" basically de-classifies the feedback, and punts it back to the "Pending emails" view for reclassification. - If a feedback has been applied to multiple nominees, declassifying it from one nominee removes it from all. * fix: Remove unused local variables * fix: Fix some missing and mis-nested html * test: Add tests for reclassifying feedback * refactor: Substantial redesign of feedback reclassification - Break out reclassify_feedback* as their own URLs and views, and revert changes to view_feedback*.html. - Replace checkboxes with a Reclassify button on each message. * fix: Remember to clear the feedback associations when reclassifying * feat: Add an 'Overcome by events' feedback type * refactor: When invoking reclassification from a view-feedback page, load the corresponding reclassify-feedback page * fix: De-conflict migration with 0004_statements Also change the coding style to match, and add a reverse migration. * fix: Fix a test case to account for new feedback type * fix: 842e730 broke the Back button * refactor: Reclassify feedback directly instead of putting it back in the work queue * fix: Adjust tests to new workflow * refactor: Further refine reclassification to avoid redirects * refactor: Impose a FeedbackTypeName ordering Also add FeedbackTypeName.legend field, rather than synthesizing it every time we classify or reclassify feedback. In the reclassification forms, only show the relevant feedback types. * refactor: Merge reclassify_feedback_* back into view_feedback_* This means the "Reclassify" button is always present, but eliminates some complexity. * refactor: Add filter(used=True) on FeedbackTypeName querysets * refactor: Add the new FeedbackTypeName to the reclassification success message * fix: Secure reclassification against rogue nomcom members * fix: Print decoded key and fully clean up test nomcom (#6094) * fix: Delete Person records when deleting a test nomcom * fix: Decode test nomcom private key before printing * test: Use correct time zone for test_statement_doc_view (#6064) * chore(deps): update all npm dependencies for playwright (#6061) Co-authored-by: depfu[bot] <23717796+depfu[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * chore(deps): update all npm dependencies for dev/diff (#6062) Co-authored-by: depfu[bot] <23717796+depfu[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * chore(deps): update all npm dependencies for dev/coverage-action (#6063) Co-authored-by: depfu[bot] <23717796+depfu[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: Hash cache key for default memcached cache (#6089) * feat: Show docs that an AD hasn't balloted on that need ballots to progress (#6075) * fix(doc): Unify help texts for document states (#6060) * Fix IESG State help text link (only) * Intermediate checkpoint * Correct URL filtering of state descriptions * Unify help texts for document states * Remove redundant load static from template --------- Co-authored-by: Robert Sparks <[email protected]> * ci: fix sandbox start.sh memcached user * fix: refactor how settings handles cache definitions (#6099) * fix: refactor how settings handles cache definitions * chore: more english-speaker readable expression * fix: Cast cache key to str before calling encode (#6100) --------- Co-authored-by: Robert Sparks <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Liubov Kurafeeva <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: nectostr <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Rich Salz <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: PriyankaN <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Priyanka Narkar <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Ali <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Roman Beltiukov <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Tero Kivinen <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Nicolas Giard <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Kesara Rathnayake <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Jennifer Richards <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Paul Selkirk <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: depfu[bot] <23717796+depfu[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Jim Fenton <[email protected]>
type_defect
| by [email protected]I.e., when assigned reviewer rejects a review:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-yang-cbor/reviewrequest/14387/
And I as an secretary go to the
https://datatracker.ietf.org/review/secdir/reviews/
page I can see the document twice on the "Unassigned review requests" section (see attached figure 1).
Then when I try to do assignments and click "Manage unassigned reviews", I see the same document again twice (see attached figure 2).
Now it is very easy to assign same document twice to different people, if I do not notice that the same document is in the list two times.
If I close the review request that was rejected, both of the items disappear from the "Unassigned review requests".
Now to get it back I need to go to the document again and request separate review for the document. I think I should have first assigned auto-suggested document to someone, and only after that close the previous review...
The datatracker should understand rejected assignments better, and combine the auto-suggestion and the rejected assignments to one assignment. I.e., most likely just show the rejected review request, and not create auto-suggested one for the same document if there is already rejected review to be assigned for the same document.
Issue migrated from trac:3211 at 2022-03-04 08:12:26 +0000
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: