[Alerting] Add snapshot telemetry for _ignored fields#221480
Merged
maryam-saeidi merged 12 commits intoelastic:mainfrom May 28, 2025
Merged
[Alerting] Add snapshot telemetry for _ignored fields#221480maryam-saeidi merged 12 commits intoelastic:mainfrom
maryam-saeidi merged 12 commits intoelastic:mainfrom
Conversation
github-actions
bot
added
the
author:obs-ux-management
maryam-saeidi
removed
the
author:obs-ux-management
github-actions
bot
added
the
author:obs-ux-management
Member
Author
|
/ci |
Member
Author
|
/ci |
maryam-saeidi
added
release_note:skip
ymao1
reviewed
May 27, 2025
x-pack/platform/plugins/shared/alerting/server/usage/task_state.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
ymao1
reviewed
May 27, 2025
ymao1
reviewed
May 27, 2025
x-pack/platform/plugins/shared/alerting/server/usage/lib/get_telemetry_from_alerts.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Contributor
|
Starting backport for target branches: 8.19 https://github.com/elastic/kibana/actions/runs/15304969318 |
Contributor
💛 Build succeeded, but was flaky
Failed CI StepsMetrics [docs]Unknown metric groupsESLint disabled line counts
Total ESLint disabled count
History
|
Contributor
💔 All backports failed
Manual backportTo create the backport manually run: Questions ?Please refer to the Backport tool documentation |
1 task
akowalska622
pushed a commit
to akowalska622/kibana
that referenced
this pull request
May 29, 2025
Closes elastic#220815 ## Summary This PR adds telemetry for _ignored fields. The goal is to have an alert based on this field and get notified in case a user hits the mapping limit, but by default, we don't expect this to happen. This PR adds `count_ignored_fields_by_rule_type` field that counts the number of _ignored fields per rule type. In the future, we can extend the telemetry data to also include the actual number of mappings over the limit (there is a [feature request](elastic/elasticsearch#68947) for adding field count information to index API) ### How to test - Add a lot of dynamic fields as mentioned here: elastic#216719 - Create a rule with a custom threshold rule with multiple group by fields to generate an alert with _ignored field - Run the following API and check the value of `count_ignored_fields_by_rule_type` ``` POST kbn:/internal/telemetry/clusters/_stats?apiVersion=2 { "unencrypted": true, "refreshCache": true } ``` <details> <summary> Here is what it looks like:</summary>   </details> --------- Co-authored-by: kibanamachine <42973632+kibanamachine@users.noreply.github.com>
This was referenced May 29, 2025
kibanamachine
added
the
backport missing
Contributor
|
Friendly reminder: Looks like this PR hasn’t been backported yet. |
Member
Author
💚 All backports created successfully
Note: Successful backport PRs will be merged automatically after passing CI. Questions ?Please refer to the Backport tool documentation |
maryam-saeidi
added a commit
to maryam-saeidi/kibana
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 2, 2025
Closes elastic#220815 ## Summary This PR adds telemetry for _ignored fields. The goal is to have an alert based on this field and get notified in case a user hits the mapping limit, but by default, we don't expect this to happen. This PR adds `count_ignored_fields_by_rule_type` field that counts the number of _ignored fields per rule type. In the future, we can extend the telemetry data to also include the actual number of mappings over the limit (there is a [feature request](elastic/elasticsearch#68947) for adding field count information to index API) ### How to test - Add a lot of dynamic fields as mentioned here: elastic#216719 - Create a rule with a custom threshold rule with multiple group by fields to generate an alert with _ignored field - Run the following API and check the value of `count_ignored_fields_by_rule_type` ``` POST kbn:/internal/telemetry/clusters/_stats?apiVersion=2 { "unencrypted": true, "refreshCache": true } ``` <details> <summary> Here is what it looks like:</summary>   </details> --------- Co-authored-by: kibanamachine <42973632+kibanamachine@users.noreply.github.com> (cherry picked from commit cde7a86) # Conflicts: # x-pack/platform/plugins/shared/alerting/server/usage/lib/get_telemetry_from_alerts.test.ts
Contributor
|
Looks like this PR has a backport PR but it still hasn't been merged. Please merge it ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync. |
maryam-saeidi
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 3, 2025
#222150) # Backport This will backport the following commits from `main` to `8.19`: - [[Alerting] Add snapshot telemetry for _ignored fields (#221480)](#221480) <!--- Backport version: 9.6.6 --> ### Questions ? Please refer to the [Backport tool documentation](https://github.com/sorenlouv/backport) <!--BACKPORT [{"author":{"name":"Maryam Saeidi","email":"maryam.saeidi@elastic.co"},"sourceCommit":{"committedDate":"2025-05-28T16:02:33Z","message":"[Alerting] Add snapshot telemetry for _ignored fields (#221480)\n\nCloses https://github.com/elastic/kibana/issues/220815\n\n## Summary\n\nThis PR adds telemetry for _ignored fields. The goal is to have an alert\nbased on this field and get notified in case a user hits the mapping\nlimit, but by default, we don't expect this to happen.\n\nThis PR adds `count_ignored_fields_by_rule_type` field that counts the\nnumber of _ignored fields per rule type.\n\nIn the future, we can extend the telemetry data to also include the\nactual number of mappings over the limit (there is a [feature\nrequest](elastic/elasticsearch#68947) for\nadding field count information to index API)\n\n### How to test\n\n- Add a lot of dynamic fields as mentioned here:\nhttps://github.com//pull/216719\n- Create a rule with a custom threshold rule with multiple group by\nfields to generate an alert with _ignored field\n- Run the following API and check the value of\n`count_ignored_fields_by_rule_type`\n ```\n POST kbn:/internal/telemetry/clusters/_stats?apiVersion=2\n {\n \"unencrypted\": true,\n \"refreshCache\": true\n }\n ```\n\n<details>\n<summary> Here is what it looks like:</summary>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n</details>\n\n---------\n\nCo-authored-by: kibanamachine <42973632+kibanamachine@users.noreply.github.com>","sha":"cde7a86287956467fffe4346a14a7fd24b99ff93","branchLabelMapping":{"^v9.1.0$":"main","^v(\\d+).(\\d+).\\d+$":"$1.$2"}},"sourcePullRequest":{"labels":["release_note:skip","backport missing","backport:version","v9.1.0","v8.19.0","author:obs-ux-management"],"title":"[Alerting] Add snapshot telemetry for _ignored fields","number":221480,"url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/221480","mergeCommit":{"message":"[Alerting] Add snapshot telemetry for _ignored fields (#221480)\n\nCloses https://github.com/elastic/kibana/issues/220815\n\n## Summary\n\nThis PR adds telemetry for _ignored fields. The goal is to have an alert\nbased on this field and get notified in case a user hits the mapping\nlimit, but by default, we don't expect this to happen.\n\nThis PR adds `count_ignored_fields_by_rule_type` field that counts the\nnumber of _ignored fields per rule type.\n\nIn the future, we can extend the telemetry data to also include the\nactual number of mappings over the limit (there is a [feature\nrequest](elastic/elasticsearch#68947) for\nadding field count information to index API)\n\n### How to test\n\n- Add a lot of dynamic fields as mentioned here:\nhttps://github.com//pull/216719\n- Create a rule with a custom threshold rule with multiple group by\nfields to generate an alert with _ignored field\n- Run the following API and check the value of\n`count_ignored_fields_by_rule_type`\n ```\n POST kbn:/internal/telemetry/clusters/_stats?apiVersion=2\n {\n \"unencrypted\": true,\n \"refreshCache\": true\n }\n ```\n\n<details>\n<summary> Here is what it looks like:</summary>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n</details>\n\n---------\n\nCo-authored-by: kibanamachine <42973632+kibanamachine@users.noreply.github.com>","sha":"cde7a86287956467fffe4346a14a7fd24b99ff93"}},"sourceBranch":"main","suggestedTargetBranches":["8.19"],"targetPullRequestStates":[{"branch":"main","label":"v9.1.0","branchLabelMappingKey":"^v9.1.0$","isSourceBranch":true,"state":"MERGED","url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/221480","number":221480,"mergeCommit":{"message":"[Alerting] Add snapshot telemetry for _ignored fields (#221480)\n\nCloses https://github.com/elastic/kibana/issues/220815\n\n## Summary\n\nThis PR adds telemetry for _ignored fields. The goal is to have an alert\nbased on this field and get notified in case a user hits the mapping\nlimit, but by default, we don't expect this to happen.\n\nThis PR adds `count_ignored_fields_by_rule_type` field that counts the\nnumber of _ignored fields per rule type.\n\nIn the future, we can extend the telemetry data to also include the\nactual number of mappings over the limit (there is a [feature\nrequest](elastic/elasticsearch#68947) for\nadding field count information to index API)\n\n### How to test\n\n- Add a lot of dynamic fields as mentioned here:\nhttps://github.com//pull/216719\n- Create a rule with a custom threshold rule with multiple group by\nfields to generate an alert with _ignored field\n- Run the following API and check the value of\n`count_ignored_fields_by_rule_type`\n ```\n POST kbn:/internal/telemetry/clusters/_stats?apiVersion=2\n {\n \"unencrypted\": true,\n \"refreshCache\": true\n }\n ```\n\n<details>\n<summary> Here is what it looks like:</summary>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n</details>\n\n---------\n\nCo-authored-by: kibanamachine <42973632+kibanamachine@users.noreply.github.com>","sha":"cde7a86287956467fffe4346a14a7fd24b99ff93"}},{"branch":"8.19","label":"v8.19.0","branchLabelMappingKey":"^v(\\d+).(\\d+).\\d+$","isSourceBranch":false,"state":"NOT_CREATED"}]}] BACKPORT-->
kibanamachine
removed
the
backport missing
zacharyparikh
pushed a commit
to zacharyparikh/kibana
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 4, 2025
Closes elastic#220815 ## Summary This PR adds telemetry for _ignored fields. The goal is to have an alert based on this field and get notified in case a user hits the mapping limit, but by default, we don't expect this to happen. This PR adds `count_ignored_fields_by_rule_type` field that counts the number of _ignored fields per rule type. In the future, we can extend the telemetry data to also include the actual number of mappings over the limit (there is a [feature request](elastic/elasticsearch#68947) for adding field count information to index API) ### How to test - Add a lot of dynamic fields as mentioned here: elastic#216719 - Create a rule with a custom threshold rule with multiple group by fields to generate an alert with _ignored field - Run the following API and check the value of `count_ignored_fields_by_rule_type` ``` POST kbn:/internal/telemetry/clusters/_stats?apiVersion=2 { "unencrypted": true, "refreshCache": true } ``` <details> <summary> Here is what it looks like:</summary>   </details> --------- Co-authored-by: kibanamachine <42973632+kibanamachine@users.noreply.github.com>
nickpeihl
pushed a commit
to nickpeihl/kibana
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 12, 2025
Closes elastic#220815 ## Summary This PR adds telemetry for _ignored fields. The goal is to have an alert based on this field and get notified in case a user hits the mapping limit, but by default, we don't expect this to happen. This PR adds `count_ignored_fields_by_rule_type` field that counts the number of _ignored fields per rule type. In the future, we can extend the telemetry data to also include the actual number of mappings over the limit (there is a [feature request](elastic/elasticsearch#68947) for adding field count information to index API) ### How to test - Add a lot of dynamic fields as mentioned here: elastic#216719 - Create a rule with a custom threshold rule with multiple group by fields to generate an alert with _ignored field - Run the following API and check the value of `count_ignored_fields_by_rule_type` ``` POST kbn:/internal/telemetry/clusters/_stats?apiVersion=2 { "unencrypted": true, "refreshCache": true } ``` <details> <summary> Here is what it looks like:</summary>   </details> --------- Co-authored-by: kibanamachine <42973632+kibanamachine@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #220815
Summary
This PR adds telemetry for _ignored fields. The goal is to have an alert based on this field and get notified in case a user hits the mapping limit, but by default, we don't expect this to happen.
This PR adds
count_ignored_fields_by_rule_typefield that counts the number of _ignored fields per rule type.In the future, we can extend the telemetry data to also include the actual number of mappings over the limit (there is a feature request for adding field count information to index API)
How to test
count_ignored_fields_by_rule_typeHere is what it looks like: