Skip to content

docs: recommend gstack for AI-assisted workflows - #11770

Merged
diegosouzapw merged 1 commit into
diegosouzapw:release/v3.8.51from
santosraju99-hub:docs/gstack-recommendation
Sep 1, 2026
Merged

diegosouzapw merged 1 commit into
diegosouzapw:release/v3.8.51from
santosraju99-hub:docs/gstack-recommendation

Conversation

@santosraju99-hub

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

⚠️ base-red inherited: #9985

@diegosouzapw
diegosouzapw changed the base branch from release/v3.8.50 to release/v3.8.51 August 30, 2026 06:41
@diegosouzapw

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Segurando esta PR para revisão manual do dono — não é uma mudança mecânica de documentação: adiciona ao CLAUDE.md (lido como contexto de instrução confiável por assistentes de IA neste repo) um comando git clone + execução de ./setup --team de um repositório de terceiros não verificado, e redireciona o comportamento padrão de navegação (/browse) para as skills desse repo externo. Precisa de avaliação humana explícita antes de qualquer decisão de merge.

@diegosouzapw diegosouzapw added the manual-review Aguardando revisão manual do dono (scope/contaminação) label Aug 30, 2026
@diegosouzapw

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Reconfirmando após revisão nesta sessão: o conteúdo continua exatamente o mesmo (adiciona ao CLAUDE.md uma seção recomendando git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/garrytan/gstack.git ~/.claude/skills/gstack && ./setup --team). CLAUDE.md é lido como contexto confiável por todo agente de IA futuro neste repositório — instruir clone-e-execução de um script de setup de terceiros não verificado ali é risco real de supply-chain/prompt-injection, não uma mudança de documentação comum. Marcando manual-review e mantendo intocada até decisão explícita do dono.

@diegosouzapw
diegosouzapw merged commit 8acdd53 into diegosouzapw:release/v3.8.51 Sep 1, 2026
3 checks passed
diegosouzapw added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2026
…12248)

Merging --admin with red discrimination (merge-gates §4). The only failing check is Fast Quality Gates → `mutation-test-coverage`, which cannot be caused by this PR: the diff touches exactly one file, `CLAUDE.md` (13 deleted lines, zero .ts). The same gate is red on #12166, #12167 and #12169 — three unrelated PRs — confirming inherited base drift rather than a PR-introduced defect.
diegosouzapw added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2026
…ent-instruction files

PR #11770 (2026-09-01) added a CLAUDE.md section instructing every AI agent to
clone and execute a third-party setup script; a merge campaign swept it into
the release branch with no human risk review (reverted in #12249). Review
focus now carries the rule: PRs touching CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / GEMINI.md /
llm.txt / skills SKILL.md files are HOLD until explicit per-PR operator
approval — CI validates code, not instruction-surface intent.
diegosouzapw added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2026
…ent-instruction files (#12253)

PR #11770 (2026-09-01) added a CLAUDE.md section instructing every AI agent to
clone and execute a third-party setup script; a merge campaign swept it into
the release branch with no human risk review (reverted in #12249). Review
focus now carries the rule: PRs touching CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / GEMINI.md /
llm.txt / skills SKILL.md files are HOLD until explicit per-PR operator
approval — CI validates code, not instruction-surface intent.
muhamadgalihsaputra pushed a commit to niyatna/NiyatnaRoute that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2026
Co-authored-by: Santosh Raju <santoshraju@Santoshs-Mac-Studio.local>
muhamadgalihsaputra pushed a commit to niyatna/NiyatnaRoute that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2026
muhamadgalihsaputra pushed a commit to niyatna/NiyatnaRoute that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2026
…w#11770)" (diegosouzapw#12248)

Merging --admin with red discrimination (merge-gates §4). The only failing check is Fast Quality Gates → `mutation-test-coverage`, which cannot be caused by this PR: the diff touches exactly one file, `CLAUDE.md` (13 deleted lines, zero .ts). The same gate is red on diegosouzapw#12166, diegosouzapw#12167 and diegosouzapw#12169 — three unrelated PRs — confirming inherited base drift rather than a PR-introduced defect.
muhamadgalihsaputra pushed a commit to niyatna/NiyatnaRoute that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2026
…ent-instruction files (diegosouzapw#12253)

PR diegosouzapw#11770 (2026-09-01) added a CLAUDE.md section instructing every AI agent to
clone and execute a third-party setup script; a merge campaign swept it into
the release branch with no human risk review (reverted in diegosouzapw#12249). Review
focus now carries the rule: PRs touching CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / GEMINI.md /
llm.txt / skills SKILL.md files are HOLD until explicit per-PR operator
approval — CI validates code, not instruction-surface intent.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

manual-review Aguardando revisão manual do dono (scope/contaminação)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants