Revert "docs: recommend gstack for AI-assisted workflows" (#11770) - #12248
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This reverts commit 8acdd53.
muhamadgalihsaputra
pushed a commit
to niyatna/NiyatnaRoute
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 27, 2026
…w#11770)" (diegosouzapw#12248) Merging --admin with red discrimination (merge-gates §4). The only failing check is Fast Quality Gates → `mutation-test-coverage`, which cannot be caused by this PR: the diff touches exactly one file, `CLAUDE.md` (13 deleted lines, zero .ts). The same gate is red on diegosouzapw#12166, diegosouzapw#12167 and diegosouzapw#12169 — three unrelated PRs — confirming inherited base drift rather than a PR-introduced defect.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reverts #11770 — process reason, not a judgement on the tool.
#11770 carried the
manual-reviewlabel, which the maintainer applies to changes he wants to decide on personally. It was merged in a batch sweep whose filter only excludeddeferred-v3.8.52andneeds-info, so themanual-reviewflag was not honoured. That is my mistake, and this revert puts the decision back where it belongs.The change added a "gstack (recommended)" section to
CLAUDE.mdinstructing contributors to clonegarrytan/gstackand run./setup --teaminto~/.claude/skills/. For the record: the repository is legitimate and widely used (~130k stars), so there is no security concern being raised here. But recommending a third-party tool inside the project's own AI-assistant instruction file — including a command that installs it into the contributor's environment — is an editorial call for the maintainer to make, not something to land as a routine docs merge.@santosraju99-hub sorry for the churn — your PR was not rejected on merit. Once @diegosouzapw decides, it can be relanded as-is with a single click; nothing about the content needs to change.
Refs #11770