Skip to content

Comments

build: Run e2e tests against ic-ref#471

Merged
hansl merged 9 commits intomasterfrom
joachim/e2e-ic-ref
Apr 20, 2020
Merged

build: Run e2e tests against ic-ref#471
hansl merged 9 commits intomasterfrom
joachim/e2e-ic-ref

Conversation

@nomeata
Copy link
Contributor

@nomeata nomeata commented Mar 20, 2020

this is a failed attempt; I don’t understand how this bats works or how to
debug it. @hansl, do you want to take over?

@nomeata nomeata changed the title e2e test: Run against ic-ref build: Run e2e tests against ic-ref Mar 20, 2020
eftychis
eftychis reviewed Mar 20, 2020
View reviewed changes
@nomeata
Copy link
Contributor Author

nomeata commented Mar 20, 2020

Ok, this kinda works. I’ll hand this over to the SDK team, as I don’t know if they want this to be in master now and whether they want my horrible bash coding in master or want to clean it up.

@hansl hansl mentioned this pull request Mar 20, 2020
Closed
@hansl hansl marked this pull request as ready for review March 22, 2020 02:13
@hansl hansl requested a review from a team March 22, 2020 02:13
@hansl hansl requested a review from a team as a code owner March 22, 2020 02:13
hansl
hansl approved these changes Mar 22, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@hansl hansl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, but will let someone else take a look since I had changes to it. I think @nomeata can also approve since his changes LGTM and I want approval for my changes ;)

@hansl
Copy link
Contributor

hansl commented Mar 22, 2020

I just did a shorthand for the USE_IC_REF stuff. It's more bash-y and easier to follow than strings.

@nomeata
Copy link
Contributor Author

nomeata commented Mar 22, 2020

I think @nomeata can also approve since his changes LGTM and I want approval for my changes ;)

Github won’t let me formally approve, as I created this PR. But your commits LGTM.

@eftychis
Copy link
Contributor

eftychis commented Mar 27, 2020

There is a connection error but the last changes don't seem to be the issue from a quick glance...

@nomeata nomeata mentioned this pull request Mar 30, 2020
Closed
@hansl hansl mentioned this pull request Apr 20, 2020
Closed
5 tasks
@hansl hansl merged commit bac14b2 into master Apr 20, 2020
@hansl hansl deleted the joachim/e2e-ic-ref branch April 20, 2020 17:25
@nomeata
Copy link
Contributor Author

nomeata commented Apr 21, 2020

Looks the merge broke master. This could happen because it was no a strict merge, i.e. the branch was not updated before, so the merge commit created a situation on master that was never CI-checked.

A handfull of git bisect runs show that merging this PR breaks master from this commit on:
89e7669

(yay for git bisect + a well-stocked nix cache to fetch any revisions dfx)

This is not surprising: This PR pins a version of ic-ref-test that tries to be compatible with a prior, random version of replica to a new random version. By upgrading replica (and updating the code to match the changed behavior of replica) these tests break.

I’ll see what the precise differences are and if I can make a ic-ref tag that pretends to behave like that version for now. Else we need to revert this.

@nomeata
Copy link
Contributor Author

nomeata commented Apr 21, 2020

fix coming

nomeata added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2020
@nomeata
chore: Bump ic-ref to track legacy3 branch
9e87388 
in #471 we added running the e2e tests aginst the `legacy2` branch of
`ic-ref`, which was tailured to SDK’s behaviour at that time. That PR
was green.

But it was merged without updating the branch, and in the meantime SKD’s
`master` updated `replica` to 0.5.4, and also changed `dfx` accordingly.
At that version, `dfx` could no longer talk to `ic-ref`, and the test
made `master` red.

So I creaed a new branch `legacy3`, off `release-0.2` in `ic-ref`,
making the necessary adjustments to be compatible with `dfx` again.
These were:

 * Do not require CBOR tag
 * Make `sender` field optional
 * Do not check signatures
 * Do not require canister registration before installation
@nomeata nomeata mentioned this pull request Apr 21, 2020
Merged
nomeata added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2020
@nomeata
chore: Bump ic-ref to track legacy3 branch (#583)
1c3f5f9 
in #471 we added running the e2e tests aginst the `legacy2` branch of
`ic-ref`, which was tailured to SDK’s behaviour at that time. That PR
was green.

But it was merged without updating the branch, and in the meantime SKD’s
`master` updated `replica` to 0.5.4, and also changed `dfx` accordingly.
At that version, `dfx` could no longer talk to `ic-ref`, and the test
made `master` red.

So I creaed a new branch `legacy3`, off `release-0.2` in `ic-ref`,
making the necessary adjustments to be compatible with `dfx` again.
These were:

 * Do not require CBOR tag
 * Make `sender` field optional
 * Do not check signatures
 * Do not require canister registration before installation
dfinity-bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2020
@dfinity-bot
build: niv advisory-db: update a0e59ff2 -> 65b9aa70
1930fed 
## Changelog for advisory-db:
Branch: master
Commits: [rustsec/advisory-db@a0e59ff2...65b9aa70](rustsec/advisory-db@a0e59ff...65b9aa7)

* [`0da539a2`](rustsec/advisory-db@0da539a) Add unmaintained crate advisory for `safe-nd` ([RustSec/advisory-db⁠#467](http://r.duckduckgo.com/l/?uddg=https://github.com/RustSec/advisory-db/issues/467))
* [`51fd5e3c`](rustsec/advisory-db@51fd5e3) Assigned RUSTSEC-2020-0063 to safe-nd ([RustSec/advisory-db⁠#469](http://r.duckduckgo.com/l/?uddg=https://github.com/RustSec/advisory-db/issues/469))
* [`3adba0fc`](rustsec/advisory-db@3adba0f) Add unmaintained crate advisory for `ffi_utils` ([RustSec/advisory-db⁠#464](http://r.duckduckgo.com/l/?uddg=https://github.com/RustSec/advisory-db/issues/464))
* [`74c2e86f`](rustsec/advisory-db@74c2e86) Assigned RUSTSEC-2020-0064 to ffi_utils ([RustSec/advisory-db⁠#470](http://r.duckduckgo.com/l/?uddg=https://github.com/RustSec/advisory-db/issues/470))
* [`a949bd46`](rustsec/advisory-db@a949bd4) Add unmaintained crate advisory for `fake_clock` ([RustSec/advisory-db⁠#465](http://r.duckduckgo.com/l/?uddg=https://github.com/RustSec/advisory-db/issues/465))
* [`00a4c19a`](rustsec/advisory-db@00a4c19) Assigned RUSTSEC-2020-0065 to fake_clock ([RustSec/advisory-db⁠#471](http://r.duckduckgo.com/l/?uddg=https://github.com/RustSec/advisory-db/issues/471))
* [`3761ab58`](rustsec/advisory-db@3761ab5) Add unmaintained crate advisory for `safe_bindgen` ([RustSec/advisory-db⁠#466](http://r.duckduckgo.com/l/?uddg=https://github.com/RustSec/advisory-db/issues/466))
* [`d5cf9d76`](rustsec/advisory-db@d5cf9d7) Assigned RUSTSEC-2020-0066 to safe_bindgen ([RustSec/advisory-db⁠#472](http://r.duckduckgo.com/l/?uddg=https://github.com/RustSec/advisory-db/issues/472))
* [`9757ff20`](rustsec/advisory-db@9757ff2) Add unmaintained crate advisory for `quic-p2p` ([RustSec/advisory-db⁠#468](http://r.duckduckgo.com/l/?uddg=https://github.com/RustSec/advisory-db/issues/468))
* [`65b9aa70`](rustsec/advisory-db@65b9aa7) Assigned RUSTSEC-2020-0067 to quic-p2p ([RustSec/advisory-db⁠#473](http://r.duckduckgo.com/l/?uddg=https://github.com/RustSec/advisory-db/issues/473))
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2020
@dfinity-bot
build: niv advisory-db: update a0e59ff2 -> 65b9aa70 (#1156)
aae5c9f 
## Changelog for advisory-db:
Branch: master
Commits: [rustsec/advisory-db@a0e59ff2...65b9aa70](rustsec/advisory-db@a0e59ff...65b9aa7)

* [`0da539a2`](rustsec/advisory-db@0da539a) Add unmaintained crate advisory for `safe-nd` ([RustSec/advisory-db⁠#467](http://r.duckduckgo.com/l/?uddg=https://github.com/RustSec/advisory-db/issues/467))
* [`51fd5e3c`](rustsec/advisory-db@51fd5e3) Assigned RUSTSEC-2020-0063 to safe-nd ([RustSec/advisory-db⁠#469](http://r.duckduckgo.com/l/?uddg=https://github.com/RustSec/advisory-db/issues/469))
* [`3adba0fc`](rustsec/advisory-db@3adba0f) Add unmaintained crate advisory for `ffi_utils` ([RustSec/advisory-db⁠#464](http://r.duckduckgo.com/l/?uddg=https://github.com/RustSec/advisory-db/issues/464))
* [`74c2e86f`](rustsec/advisory-db@74c2e86) Assigned RUSTSEC-2020-0064 to ffi_utils ([RustSec/advisory-db⁠#470](http://r.duckduckgo.com/l/?uddg=https://github.com/RustSec/advisory-db/issues/470))
* [`a949bd46`](rustsec/advisory-db@a949bd4) Add unmaintained crate advisory for `fake_clock` ([RustSec/advisory-db⁠#465](http://r.duckduckgo.com/l/?uddg=https://github.com/RustSec/advisory-db/issues/465))
* [`00a4c19a`](rustsec/advisory-db@00a4c19) Assigned RUSTSEC-2020-0065 to fake_clock ([RustSec/advisory-db⁠#471](http://r.duckduckgo.com/l/?uddg=https://github.com/RustSec/advisory-db/issues/471))
* [`3761ab58`](rustsec/advisory-db@3761ab5) Add unmaintained crate advisory for `safe_bindgen` ([RustSec/advisory-db⁠#466](http://r.duckduckgo.com/l/?uddg=https://github.com/RustSec/advisory-db/issues/466))
* [`d5cf9d76`](rustsec/advisory-db@d5cf9d7) Assigned RUSTSEC-2020-0066 to safe_bindgen ([RustSec/advisory-db⁠#472](http://r.duckduckgo.com/l/?uddg=https://github.com/RustSec/advisory-db/issues/472))
* [`9757ff20`](rustsec/advisory-db@9757ff2) Add unmaintained crate advisory for `quic-p2p` ([RustSec/advisory-db⁠#468](http://r.duckduckgo.com/l/?uddg=https://github.com/RustSec/advisory-db/issues/468))
* [`65b9aa70`](rustsec/advisory-db@65b9aa7) Assigned RUSTSEC-2020-0067 to quic-p2p ([RustSec/advisory-db⁠#473](http://r.duckduckgo.com/l/?uddg=https://github.com/RustSec/advisory-db/issues/473))
dfinity-bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 6, 2021
@dfinity-bot
build: niv common: update 3da848b5 -> eee9aaba
782d02b 
## Changelog for common:
Branch: master
Commits: [dfinity-lab/common@3da848b5...eee9aaba](https://github.com/dfinity-lab/common/compare/3da848b5128d4e3c2e673cff04c0d2904288d6fe...eee9aaba8d3ca633b2fd9fa7024aaab388cc10a4)

* [`ac6fbf36`](https://github.com/dfinity-lab/common/commit/ac6fbf365abe70a48fa9efcf952e38615f66b5cd) Add SSH key for Eero Kelly ([dfinity-lab/common⁠#470](http://r.duckduckgo.com/l/?uddg=https://github.com/dfinity-lab/common/issues/470))
* [`eee9aaba`](https://github.com/dfinity-lab/common/commit/eee9aaba8d3ca633b2fd9fa7024aaab388cc10a4) Change Andriy's SSH key from RSA to ED ([dfinity-lab/common⁠#471](http://r.duckduckgo.com/l/?uddg=https://github.com/dfinity-lab/common/issues/471))
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 6, 2021
@dfinity-bot
build: niv common: update 3da848b5 -> eee9aaba (#1851)
ec5254f 
## Changelog for common:
Branch: master
Commits: [dfinity-lab/common@3da848b5...eee9aaba](https://github.com/dfinity-lab/common/compare/3da848b5128d4e3c2e673cff04c0d2904288d6fe...eee9aaba8d3ca633b2fd9fa7024aaab388cc10a4)

* [`ac6fbf36`](https://github.com/dfinity-lab/common/commit/ac6fbf365abe70a48fa9efcf952e38615f66b5cd) Add SSH key for Eero Kelly ([dfinity-lab/common⁠#470](http://r.duckduckgo.com/l/?uddg=https://github.com/dfinity-lab/common/issues/470))
* [`eee9aaba`](https://github.com/dfinity-lab/common/commit/eee9aaba8d3ca633b2fd9fa7024aaab388cc10a4) Change Andriy's SSH key from RSA to ED ([dfinity-lab/common⁠#471](http://r.duckduckgo.com/l/?uddg=https://github.com/dfinity-lab/common/issues/471))
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@nmattia nmattia nmattia approved these changes

+2 more reviewers

@eftychis eftychis eftychis left review comments

@hansl hansl hansl approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@nomeata @hansl @eftychis @nmattia