python3Packages.pycyphal & python3Packages.pyuavcan: init pycyphal at 1.15.2 & deprecate pyuavcan

[kip93]

Description of changes

Adds the pycyphal python package, and deprecates pyuavcan (they're the same package, it's just been renamed).

(Won't cross compile until dependencies bellow are merged)

Depends on #249520, #249524, #249532, & #249157

NOTE: The "error" that ofborg shows seems to only be about the deprecation warning.

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux (cross compiled from x86_64-linux)
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 23.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

[bobby285271]

I reverted 7b13a35 in #267423 since CI is red here

(I remember there is RFC 127 talking about something similar, but I did not really follow the progress...)

[kip93]

I thought this was not going to make 23.11, so I haven't tested it as of late, but last time the error was because of the deprecation warning. Maybe it needs a bit more love to make the deprecation warning work? Or we could keep both packages for now and then deprecate pyuavcan on 24.05.

[kip93]

And if you reverted this, you'd need to also revert #249548 since it depends on this

[bobby285271]

#267423 only drops the lib.warn, how would #249548 depend on it?

[kip93]

Oh I missread the title I thought you reverted this entire PR. Then yakut is fine