Skip to content

Forward-merge release/26.04 into main - #7923

Merged
jameslamb merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
release/26.04
Mar 31, 2026
Merged

Forward-merge release/26.04 into main#7923
jameslamb merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
release/26.04

Conversation

@rapids-bot

@rapids-bot rapids-bot Bot commented Mar 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Forward-merge triggered by push to release/26.04 that creates a PR to keep main up-to-date. If this PR is unable to be immediately merged due to conflicts, it will remain open for the team to manually merge. See forward-merger docs for more info.

## Summary

The PR/issue project automation workflow set `OVERRIDE_ITEM: true` for PRs targeting `release/*`, so every `synchronize` run re-applied the Release field from the base branch name and overwrote manual values (e.g. after retargeting).

## Changes

- Set `OVERRIDE_ITEM: false` on `update-release` for all cases that run that job (no conditional).
- Drop the `override-item` job output and the `echo "override-item=…"` lines from the determine-version step.

Authors:
  - Simon Adorf (https://github.com/csadorf)

Approvers:
  - James Lamb (https://github.com/jameslamb)

URL: #7921
@rapids-bot
rapids-bot Bot requested a review from a team as a code owner March 23, 2026 14:49
@rapids-bot
rapids-bot Bot requested a review from bdice March 23, 2026 14:49
@rapids-bot

rapids-bot Bot commented Mar 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

FAILURE - Unable to forward-merge due to an error, manual merge is necessary. Do not use the Resolve conflicts option in this PR, follow these instructions https://docs.rapids.ai/maintainers/forward-merger/

IMPORTANT: When merging this PR, do not use the auto-merger (i.e. the /merge comment). Instead, an admin must manually merge by changing the merging strategy to Create a Merge Commit. Otherwise, history will be lost and the branches become incompatible.

- Bump sklearn versions we test with.
- Remove no longer relevant non-numeric limitation.

Authors:
  - Jim Crist-Harif (https://github.com/jcrist)

Approvers:
  - Tim Head (https://github.com/betatim)

URL: #7929
@rapids-bot
rapids-bot Bot requested a review from a team as a code owner March 25, 2026 08:05
@rapids-bot
rapids-bot Bot requested a review from jcrist March 25, 2026 08:05
viclafargue and others added 2 commits March 25, 2026 13:25
…7807)

Closes #7806

When there are more workers than data partitions, some workers end up with no data, causing hangs or crashes in collective operations that expect all participants to contribute rows.

The changes in this PR prune workers with zero-row partitions from `DistributedDataHandler` before initializing `NCCL` communicators.

Authors:
  - Victor Lafargue (https://github.com/viclafargue)
  - Jim Crist-Harif (https://github.com/jcrist)

Approvers:
  - James Lamb (https://github.com/jameslamb)
  - Jim Crist-Harif (https://github.com/jcrist)

URL: #7807
We're seeing some test failures with the new openblas release on aarch64 (accuracy issues on comparison with sklearn's results, _not_ issues in cuml's execution). I suspect a regression in openblas.

For now we pin openblas on aarch64.

Authors:
  - Jim Crist-Harif (https://github.com/jcrist)

Approvers:
  - James Lamb (https://github.com/jameslamb)

URL: #7933
@rapids-bot
rapids-bot Bot requested a review from a team as a code owner March 30, 2026 19:41
@github-actions github-actions Bot added conda conda issue Cython / Python Cython or Python issue labels Mar 30, 2026
@jcrist

jcrist commented Mar 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Tackling conflicts in #7936

The scipy docs site has some reliability issues, and can sometimes cause our docs to fail to build. While they're resolving this, we'll disable scipy intersphinx mappings. We rarely make use of scipy intersphinx mappings anyway, so this won't be a huge docs UX degradation.

Authors:
  - Jim Crist-Harif (https://github.com/jcrist)

Approvers:
  - Dante Gama Dessavre (https://github.com/dantegd)

URL: #7935
@jameslamb
jameslamb merged commit 5a76405 into main Mar 31, 2026
35 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

conda conda issue Cython / Python Cython or Python issue

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants