Bring in nco DEBUG flag changes for ops

[BrianCurtis-NOAA]

Pull Request Summary

Bring in nco DEBUG flag changes for ops

Description

NCO pushes for the two flags -check all -ftrapuv to be in as many components that go into operations as possible. We've added -check noarg_temp_created as it makes the logs much smaller.

Issue(s) addressed

Commit Message

• Add -check all -check noarg_temp_created -ftrapuv flags to intel DEBUG builds

Check list

• Branch is up to date with the authoritative repository (NOAA-EMC) develop branch.
• Checked the checklist for a developer submitting to develop.
• If a version number update is required, checked the updating version number checklist.
• If a new feature was added, a regression test for testing the new feature is added.

Testing

• How were these changes tested? UFSWM through building all compiles in their rt.conf
• Are the changes covered by regression tests? (If not, why? Do new tests need to be added?)
• Have the matrix regression tests been run (if yes, please note HPC and compiler)?
• Please indicate the expected changes in the regression test output, (Note the list of known non-identical tests.) No changes anticipated.
• Please provide the summary output of matrix.comp (matrix.Diff.txt, matrixCompFull.txt and matrixCompSummary.txt):

[JessicaMeixner-NOAA]

Thanks for these updates @BrianCurtis-NOAA

[JessicaMeixner-NOAA]

@BrianCurtis-NOAA - Is there a reason this PR is a draft still? Are we unsure of the requirements or something else?

[BrianCurtis-NOAA]

While testing there were baselines changes and I put it on the back burner trying to get some other higher priority things done. I hope to get back to this soon.

[BrianCurtis-NOAA]

And to clarify, i hadn't identified where it was coming from. Probably unrelated to WW3

[JessicaMeixner-NOAA]

@BrianCurtis-NOAA I confirmed this change alone is not changing answers in UFS so I'll make a PR to develop branch, which we'll then merge to dev/ufs-weather-model. I'll keep this PR open until that happens.

[BrianCurtis-NOAA]

@BrianCurtis-NOAA I confirmed this change alone is not changing answers in UFS so I'll make a PR to develop branch, which we'll then merge to dev/ufs-weather-model. I'll keep this PR open until that happens.

OK, as long as it's tested in build and run, i'm OK with it going in.

[JessicaMeixner-NOAA]

This PR was merged with #1480