Skip to content

jellyfish-transaction-signature#369

Merged
fuxingloh merged 15 commits intomainfrom
handpick-jellyfish-tx-signature
Jun 14, 2021
Merged

jellyfish-transaction-signature#369
fuxingloh merged 15 commits intomainfrom
handpick-jellyfish-tx-signature

Conversation

@ivan-zynesis
Copy link
Contributor

@ivan-zynesis ivan-zynesis commented Jun 11, 2021

What kind of PR is this?:

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

To remove crypto dependencies from jellyfish-transaction
to become pure transaction object-buffer (de)composer

Which issue(s) does this PR fixes?:

Fixes #

Additional comments?:

fixing build issue, to replace #359

@qlty-cloud-legacy
Copy link

qlty-cloud-legacy bot commented Jun 11, 2021

Code Climate has analyzed commit b7d8473 and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

View more on Code Climate.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 11, 2021

size-limit report 📦

Path Size Loading time (3g) Running time (snapdragon) Total time
packages/jellyfish/dist/index.umd.js 20.3 KB (0%) 407 ms (0%) 152 ms (-1.23% 🔽) 558 ms

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 11, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #369 (b7d8473) into main (c1c6335) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #369   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.15%   97.15%           
=======================================
  Files          92       94    +2     
  Lines        2670     2670           
  Branches      342      344    +2     
=======================================
  Hits         2594     2594           
  Misses         76       76           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
packages/jellyfish-transaction/src/index.ts 100.00% <ø> (ø)
packages/jellyfish-transaction/src/tx_segwit.ts 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...llyfish-transaction-builder/src/txn/txn_builder.ts 96.15% <100.00%> (+0.07%) ⬆️
...kages/jellyfish-transaction-signature/src/index.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...ellyfish-transaction-signature/src/tx_signature.ts 97.29% <100.00%> (ø)
packages/jellyfish-transaction/src/tx.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
packages/jellyfish-wallet-mnemonic/src/mnemonic.ts 98.00% <100.00%> (+0.04%) ⬆️
packages/jellyfish-api-core/src/category/oracle.ts 100.00% <0.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c1c6335...b7d8473. Read the comment docs.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jun 11, 2021

✔️ Deploy Preview for jellyfish-defi ready!

🔨 Explore the source changes: a398c4e

🔍 Inspect the deploy log: https://app.netlify.com/sites/jellyfish-defi/deploys/60c2d9f7c1e1cb000860950f

😎 Browse the preview: https://deploy-preview-369--jellyfish-defi.netlify.app

@ivan-zynesis ivan-zynesis changed the title start over using updated main jellyfish-transaction-signature Jun 11, 2021
@ivan-zynesis ivan-zynesis marked this pull request as ready for review June 11, 2021 06:32
Copy link
Contributor

@fuxingloh fuxingloh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I will do a proper review/check after AES get merged in

ivan-zynesis and others added 2 commits June 11, 2021 15:48
Co-authored-by: Fuxing Loh <4266087+fuxingloh@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@fuxingloh fuxingloh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good, we should remove devDeps

@ivan-zynesis ivan-zynesis requested a review from fuxingloh June 14, 2021 06:48
@fuxingloh fuxingloh merged commit 5983db3 into main Jun 14, 2021
@fuxingloh fuxingloh deleted the handpick-jellyfish-tx-signature branch June 14, 2021 08:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants