Skip to content

STG 73#13105

Merged
seanmcc-msft merged 92 commits intomasterfrom
feature/storage/stg73base
Jul 2, 2020
Merged

STG 73#13105
seanmcc-msft merged 92 commits intomasterfrom
feature/storage/stg73base

Conversation

@seanmcc-msft
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

seanmcc-msft and others added 30 commits February 25, 2020 14:09
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@amnguye amnguye left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good

}
catch (RequestFailedException)
{
}
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If GetProperties fails, is it okay to catch it and pass the test?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We need to look into this one, I don't remember what I was doing here.

}

/// <summary>
///
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NIT - Constructor.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hm?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh I meant in the summary add "Constructor" cause it's blank

Comment on lines +175 to +177
// If the dictionary contains a key with policy id, we are not required to do any parsing since
// the policy id should already be stored in the ObjectReplicationDestinationPolicyId.
if (OrIds.First().Key == "policy-id")
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we get the Object Replication properties of a destination blob, then it will be the only entry in the dictionary (with a key value of "policy-id")

@seanmcc-msft
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/azp run net - storage - tests

@azure-pipelines
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@seanmcc-msft
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/azp run net - storage - tests

@azure-pipelines
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@seanmcc-msft
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/azp run net - storage - tests

@azure-pipelines
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@seanmcc-msft
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/azp run net - storage - tests

@azure-pipelines
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@seanmcc-msft
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/azp run net - storage - tests

@azure-pipelines
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@seanmcc-msft
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Test results:

https://dev.azure.com/azure-sdk/internal/_build/results?buildId=445175&view=ms.vss-test-web.build-test-results-tab

The main issues

  • SAS. The SAS tests are passing for me locally in live mode. I believe the issue is the 2019-12-12 SAS hasn't rolled out to all the central Canada tenants yet.
  • Batch Set Access Tier with Version or Snapshot. Failing for me locally live, and failing live against canary. This might be an SDK bug.
  • ClientSideEncryptionTests.ReadPlaintextMessage() (Queues). "any old message" and "ᛁᚳ᛫ᛗᚨᚷ᛫ᚷᛚᚨᛋ᛫ᛖᚩᛏᚪᚾ᛫ᚩᚾᛞ᛫ᚻᛁᛏ᛫ᚾᛖ᛫ᚻᛖᚪᚱᛗᛁᚪᚧ᛫ᛗᛖ" test cases are failing for me locally live. This might actually be an SDK bug, related to Queue Encryption deserializer bug fix #13161.
  • FileClientTests.Ctor_ConnectionStringEscapePath() (Share Files). Test is failing for me locally. This might actually be an SDK bug.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants