Skip to content

Revert changes for LexisNexis InstantVerify AB test#9764

Merged
jmhooper merged 3 commits intomainfrom
jmhooper-revert-iv-ab-test
Dec 14, 2023
Merged

Revert changes for LexisNexis InstantVerify AB test#9764
jmhooper merged 3 commits intomainfrom
jmhooper-revert-iv-ab-test

Conversation

@jmhooper
Copy link
Contributor

When we deployed the changes in #9763 and #9743 a new argument was introduced for the resolution proofing job. This argument was not recognized by old hosts performing the job which led to an argument error.

This commit reverts both of those and adds a commit to introduce the argument.

Once this commit is merged and deployed we will make another change to use the argument by reverting the reverts.

…ProofingJob`

This commit adds a arg to the `ResolutionProofingJob` which was used in the changes in #9743. That commit was reverted. Old workers did not know about this arg so they raised an ArgumentError when they encountered it. We reverted that change so we could introduce the arg in this one and then revert the revert.

[skip changelog]
@jmhooper jmhooper force-pushed the jmhooper-revert-iv-ab-test branch from 1af9dbc to 9628e29 Compare December 14, 2023 20:15
Copy link
Contributor

@soniaconnolly soniaconnolly left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM after talking it through, thanks!

@jmhooper jmhooper merged commit 6bcdb7e into main Dec 14, 2023
@jmhooper jmhooper deleted the jmhooper-revert-iv-ab-test branch December 14, 2023 20:36
jmhooper added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 14, 2023
I reverted 2 changes in #9764 to address a bug in the way the arguments were passed to the ResolutionProofingJob. This commit reverts those 2 reverts to put the A/B test implementation back in place.

* Revert "Revert "LG-11671: Lexisnexis Instant Verify workflow A/B test (#9743)""
* Revert "Revert "Capitalization: Rename LexisnexisInstantVerify to LexisNexisInstantVerify (#9763)""

[skip changelog]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants