Skip to content

Conversation

@sean-zlai
Copy link
Contributor

@sean-zlai sean-zlai commented Mar 6, 2025

Summary

A continuation of an earlier fix, if your system is using dark mode, the class would be removed unintentionally on first render of a Svelte UX component.

This fix occurred in @layerstack/svelte-stores's themeStore and package bumped in latest Svelte UX version. Also bumped LayerChart version which includes a small legend/tooltip click propagation issue (something we wouldn't have encountered yet since we don't use <LineChart ontooltipclick={...}>).

Before

CleanShot.2025-03-06.at.14.52.46.mp4

After

CleanShot.2025-03-06.at.14.57.47.mp4

Checklist

  • Added Unit Tests
  • Covered by existing CI
  • Integration tested
  • Documentation update

…vertent dark mode removal when rendering a component
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 6, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request updates dependency versions in the frontend package.json file without altering other configurations. The updates bump the version of the "layerchart" package from ^1.0.5 to ^1.0.6 and the "svelte-ux" package from ^1.0.1 to ^1.0.2.

Changes

File Change Summary
frontend/package.json Updated dependency "layerchart" from ^1.0.5 to ^1.0.6 and "svelte-ux" from ^1.0.1 to ^1.0.2.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • ken-zlai

Poem

In code where versions shift anew,
Dependencies rise with changes true.
Layerchart and svelte-ux take flight,
In the package file their stars ignite.
A subtle tune of upgrade bright.

Warning

Review ran into problems

🔥 Problems

GitHub Actions and Pipeline Checks: Resource not accessible by integration - https://docs.github.com/rest/actions/workflow-runs#list-workflow-runs-for-a-repository.

Please grant the required permissions to the CodeRabbit GitHub App under the organization or repository settings.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro (Legacy)

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f992e7b and bcac5cf.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • frontend/package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • frontend/package.json (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • frontend/package.json
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: enforce_triggered_workflows

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@sean-zlai sean-zlai requested a review from ken-zlai March 6, 2025 20:01
@sean-zlai sean-zlai merged commit 7554aa2 into main Mar 6, 2025
6 checks passed
@sean-zlai sean-zlai deleted the sean/fix-dark-mode-removal branch March 6, 2025 21:40
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Mar 13, 2025
4 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants