Skip to content

Conversation

@sean-zlai
Copy link
Contributor

@sean-zlai sean-zlai commented Feb 27, 2025

Summary

Fixes close/overlapping series points not properly triggering highlight. Video after update:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fc4d8631-1525-4196-81b7-2092e47c58f1

Release also improves performance of Spline/LineCharts by up to 33% from my testing. More work to make the summary/distributions page initial render much faster, but moving in the right direction.

This PR also fixes distribution zoom resetting on chart click (similar to drift/feature chart change in #445)

Checklist

  • Added Unit Tests
  • Covered by existing CI
  • Integration tested
  • Documentation update

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the charting component dependency to incorporate minor bug fixes and improvements for enhanced stability.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Modified the event handling logic for the PercentileLineChart component to ensure xDomain is assigned directly from event details.

…ight and improved LineChart perf (up to 33%)
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 27, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the layerchart dependency in the frontend configuration. The version is bumped from ^1.0.0 to ^1.0.1, indicating a patch release likely addressing bug fixes or minor improvements. Additionally, the onbrushend event handler in the PercentileLineChart component is modified to directly assign detail.xDomain to xDomain.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
frontend/package.json Updated "layerchart" version from ^1.0.0 to ^1.0.1.
frontend/src/routes/[conf]/[name]/observability/summary/+page.svelte Modified onbrushend event handler to directly assign detail.xDomain to xDomain.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • ken-zlai

Poem

A tiny change, a version shift,
layerchart takes a little lift.
Dependencies dance with a gentle beat,
In our code, where updates meet.
Cheers to the patch that makes our code complete!

Warning

Review ran into problems

🔥 Problems

GitHub Actions and Pipeline Checks: Resource not accessible by integration - https://docs.github.com/rest/actions/workflow-runs#list-workflow-runs-for-a-repository.

Please grant the required permissions to the CodeRabbit GitHub App under the organization or repository settings.


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@sean-zlai sean-zlai requested a review from ken-zlai February 27, 2025 20:39
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro (Legacy)

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 148ae30 and 36237de.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • frontend/src/routes/[conf]/[name]/observability/summary/+page.svelte (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: frontend_tests
  • GitHub Check: enforce_triggered_workflows

Comment on lines +74 to +76
onbrushend={(detail: { xDomain?: DomainType }) => {
xDomain = detail.xDomain;
}}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Type safety concern with direct assignment.

Direct assignment of potentially undefined detail.xDomain may cause inconsistent behavior.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check how xDomain is handled elsewhere in the codebase
rg "xDomain\s*=\s*\w+\.xDomain" --type svelte
# Check if null checks were previously used with xDomain assignment
rg "xDomain\s*=.*\?\?" --type svelte

Length of output: 148


Below is a revised shell script to re-run the search using a glob pattern (since Svelte isn’t recognized as a file type) so we can verify how xDomain is assigned throughout the code:

Re-verify xDomain usage for type safety.
Please check the output of these commands to ensure that assignments, especially of potentially undefined values, are handled safely.


🏁 Script executed:

[run_scripts]
#!/bin/bash
# Re-run search in .svelte files for xDomain assignments.
rg "xDomain\s*=\s*\w+\.xDomain" --glob "*.svelte"
echo "------"
# Look for any null-coalescing checks in xDomain assignments.
rg "xDomain\s*=.*\?\?" --glob "*.svelte"

Length of output: 648


Action Required: Add safeguard for xDomain assignment.
Direct assignment of detail.xDomain in both summary and drift pages may cause type-safety issues. Consider adding a fallback or explicit null/undefined check (e.g., using ?? defaultValue) to ensure a valid value.

  • Files affected:
    • frontend/src/routes/[conf]/[name]/observability/summary/+page.svelte (line 74-76)
    • frontend/src/routes/[conf]/[name]/observability/drift/+page.svelte

Copy link
Contributor

@ken-zlai ken-zlai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@sean-zlai sean-zlai merged commit 272a620 into main Feb 27, 2025
6 checks passed
@sean-zlai sean-zlai deleted the sean/update-layerchart-1.0.1 branch February 27, 2025 21:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants