PR: Fix imported modules logic if 'FORCE_QT_API' is empty#230
PR: Fix imported modules logic if 'FORCE_QT_API' is empty#230dalthviz merged 1 commit intospyder-ide:masterfrom
Conversation
CAM-Gerlach
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This does seem like the intended behavior based on the comment, though I'm not sure why it wasn't caught in the original PR #194 . This will affect backward compatibility. however, but no way around that due to how it was implemented previously.
@JasonGilholme any feedback here?
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
thanks @CAM-Gerlach for taking care of this quite fundamental package. How can i trigger the gh-actions-based checks? |
|
Hi @CAM-Gerlach any progress on the maintainers issue? looking at #229 #233 #225 and others i feel like many other packages are waiting for qtpy to bump its version, drop qt4 and support pyside6 |
|
could you please pay a little attention on this base package too? Or delegate work to a new maintainer. |
|
another month, another reminder @andfoy @ccordoba12 ;) |
|
Hi @hiaselhans could you remove the unrelated commits from this PR? Or if is better for you, maybe we can help you with that? Let us know :) |
|
Hi @dalthviz ! great to see some news here… |
|
Thank you for the fast response @hiaselhans ! I think that now these commits are in the branch so if you create a new PR that uses the same branch will lead still to seeing them. What you could try is to create a new clean branch (using as base an updated master branch version) and then cherry pick the commits here that are actually related to the import logic for |
|
Ok i think i can do it later today :) |
d724840 to
3f676d9
Compare
|
hi @dalthviz i removed all commits but that one :) |
As mentioned in #222 i stumbled across this.
before:

after (expected behaviour):

It seems obvious to me and i spare further explination.