Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add GameMaker #2448

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 23, 2023
Merged

Add GameMaker #2448

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 23, 2023

Conversation

bytecauldron
Copy link
Contributor

https://github.com/bytecauldron/awesome-gamemaker

GameMaker is a popular, beginner-friendly video game engine for 2D (and 3D) titles. The community has created many great extensions and resources over the years that are worth sharing with both beginner and advanced game developers.

By submitting this pull request I confirm I've read and complied with the below requirements 🖖

Please read it multiple times. I spent a lot of time on these guidelines and most people miss a lot.

Requirements for your pull request

  • Don't waste my time. Do a good job, adhere to all the guidelines, and be responsive.
  • You have to review at least 2 other open pull requests.
    Try to prioritize unreviewed PRs, but you can also add more comments to reviewed PRs. Go through the below list when reviewing. This requirement is meant to help make the Awesome project self-sustaining. Comment here which PRs you reviewed. You're expected to put a good effort into this and to be thorough. Look at previous PR reviews for inspiration. Just commenting “looks good” or simply marking the pull request as approved does not count! You have to actually point out mistakes or improvement suggestions.
  • You have read and understood the instructions for creating a list.
  • This pull request has a title in the format Add Name of List.
    • Add Swift
    • Add Software Architecture
    • Update readme.md
    • Add Awesome Swift
    • Add swift
    • add Swift
    • Adding Swift
    • Added Swift
  • Your entry here should include a short description about the project/theme of the list. It should not describe the list itself. The first character should be uppercase and the description should end in a dot. It should be an objective description and not a tagline or marketing blurb.
    • - [iOS](…) - Mobile operating system for Apple phones and tablets.
    • - [Framer](…) - Prototyping interactive UI designs.
    • - [iOS](…) - Resources and tools for iOS development.
    • - [Framer](…)
    • - [Framer](…) - prototyping interactive UI designs
  • Your entry should be added at the bottom of the appropriate category.
  • The title of your entry should be title-cased and the URL to your list should end in #readme.
    • Example: - [Software Architecture](https://github.com/simskij/awesome-software-architecture#readme) - The discipline of designing and building software.
  • The suggested Awesome list complies with the below requirements.

Requirements for your Awesome list

  • Has been around for at least 30 days.
    That means 30 days from either the first real commit or when it was open-sourced. Whatever is most recent.
  • Don't open a Draft / WIP pull request while you work on the guidelines. A pull request should be 100% ready and should adhere to all the guidelines when you open it. Instead use #2242 for incubation visibility.
  • Run awesome-lint on your list and fix the reported issues. If there are false-positives or things that cannot/shouldn't be fixed, please report it.
  • The default branch should be named main, not master.
  • Includes a succinct description of the project/theme at the top of the readme. (Example)
    • Mobile operating system for Apple phones and tablets.
    • Prototyping interactive UI designs.
    • Resources and tools for iOS development.
    • Awesome Framer packages and tools.
  • It's the result of hard work and the best I could possibly produce.
    If you have not put in considerable effort into your list, your pull request will be immediately closed.
  • The repo name of your list should be in lowercase slug format: awesome-name-of-list.
    • awesome-swift
    • awesome-web-typography
    • awesome-Swift
    • AwesomeWebTypography
  • The heading title of your list should be in title case format: # Awesome Name of List.
    • # Awesome Swift
    • # Awesome Web Typography
    • # awesome-swift
    • # AwesomeSwift
  • Non-generated Markdown file in a GitHub repo.
  • The repo should have awesome-list & awesome as GitHub topics. I encourage you to add more relevant topics.
  • Not a duplicate. Please search for existing submissions.
  • Only has awesome items. Awesome lists are curations of the best, not everything.
  • Does not contain items that are unmaintained, has archived repo, deprecated, or missing docs. If you really need to include such items, they should be in a separate Markdown file.
  • Includes a project logo/illustration whenever possible.
    • Either centered, fullwidth, or placed at the top-right of the readme. (Example)
    • The image should link to the project website or any relevant website.
    • The image should be high-DPI. Set it to maximum half the width of the original image.
  • Entries have a description, unless the title is descriptive enough by itself. It rarely is though.
  • Includes the Awesome badge.
    • Should be placed on the right side of the readme heading.
      • Can be placed centered if the list has a centered graphics header.
    • Should link back to this list.
  • Has a Table of Contents section.
    • Should be named Contents, not Table of Contents.
    • Should be the first section in the list.
    • Should only have one level of nested lists, preferably none.
    • Must not feature Contributing or Footnotes sections.
  • Has an appropriate license.
    • We strongly recommend the CC0 license, but any Creative Commons license will work.
      • Tip: You can quickly add it to your repo by going to this URL: https://github.com/<user>/<repo>/community/license/new?branch=main&template=cc0-1.0 (replace <user> and <repo> accordingly).
    • A code license like MIT, BSD, Apache, GPL, etc, is not acceptable. Neither are WTFPL and Unlicense.
    • Place a file named license or LICENSE in the repo root with the license text.
    • Do not add the license name, text, or a Licence section to the readme. GitHub already shows the license name and link to the full text at the top of the repo.
    • To verify that you've read all the guidelines, please comment on your pull request with just the word unicorn.
  • Has contribution guidelines.
    • The file should be named contributing.md. Casing is up to you.
    • It can optionally be linked from the readme in a dedicated section titled Contributing, positioned at the top or bottom of the main content.
    • The section should not appear in the Table of Contents.
  • All non-important but necessary content (like extra copyright notices, hyperlinks to sources, pointers to expansive content, etc) should be grouped in a Footnotes section at the bottom of the readme. The section should not be present in the Table of Contents.
  • Has consistent formatting and proper spelling/grammar.
    • The link and description are separated by a dash.
      Example: - [AVA](…) - JavaScript test runner.
    • The description starts with an uppercase character and ends with a period.
    • Consistent and correct naming. For example, Node.js, not NodeJS or node.js.
  • Doesn't use hard-wrapping.
  • Doesn't include a Travis badge.
    You can still use Travis for list linting, but the badge has no value in the readme.
  • Doesn't include an Inspired by awesome-foo or Inspired by the Awesome project kinda link at the top of the readme. The Awesome badge is enough.

Go to the top and read it again.

@bytecauldron
Copy link
Contributor Author

unicorn

@bytecauldron
Copy link
Contributor Author

Pull Request Contributions:
#2335
#2332
#2327

Copy link
Contributor

@RahulBirCodes RahulBirCodes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good job! The linting succeeds and all the other list guidelines seem to be met. The only issue I could think of would be the description of the list's theme. I think game engine is too vague since you're only talking about GameMaker.

@RahulBirCodes RahulBirCodes mentioned this pull request Dec 14, 2022
@bytecauldron
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you for taking a look, @RahulBirCodes! I agree, the description is a bit vague. I chose that mainly because it's the same description for the other listed engines (Godot, Unity, etc).

@vhladiienko
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @bytecauldron!

I think your list is great, but I'd double-check on the hard-wrapping compliance: seems like your lists have an extra line in between points, which makes it unnecessarily longer (you can easily remove them using regex in any modern text editor). Other than that, awesome job! And cheers to a fellow game developer 👊

@bytecauldron
Copy link
Contributor Author

bytecauldron commented Jan 21, 2023

Thanks, @vhladiienko! I will get that fixed. Much appreciated.

Edit: Fixed! 👍

@vhladiienko vhladiienko mentioned this pull request Feb 2, 2023
@modenero
Copy link

modenero commented Feb 7, 2023

Good job! The linting succeeds and all the other list guidelines seem to be met. The only issue I could think of would be the description of the list's theme. I think game engine is too vague since you're only talking about GameMaker.

This is a great list and I can ONLY offer the same recommendation. i would first appreciate a succinct description of what GameMaker is (as a product/service); and then how this list applies to that product/service.

@modenero modenero mentioned this pull request Feb 7, 2023
@bytecauldron
Copy link
Contributor Author

image
Hi @modenero! Thank you for taking a look. To clarify, should I provide a more succinct description when the existing list of game engines are specified as "Game engine."?

@modenero
Copy link

modenero commented Feb 9, 2023

should I provide a more succinct description when the existing list of game engines are specified as "Game engine."?

oh no, not in the main directory, i meant to add a description in the header of your own list.

personally, i'm not that familiar with game engines other than Unity and Unreal, so I would first like to know basic features of GameMaker, like 2D or 3D. and perhaps what type or level of Creator it targets (eg. novice or HTML5 respectively)

a "succinct" one-liner is probably good for a quick intro

@bytecauldron
Copy link
Contributor Author

bytecauldron commented Feb 9, 2023

@modenero Oh, gotcha! I misunderstood. I'll see what I can add, thank you.

Edit: Ok, I added a one-liner at the top. Hopefully that provides some more context. 👍

@sindresorhus
Copy link
Owner

The items in the https://github.com/bytecauldron/awesome-gamemaker#youtube section could use a description. Now it's just a random list of YouTube channels without any context.

@sindresorhus sindresorhus merged commit 572026c into sindresorhus:main Apr 23, 2023
@sindresorhus
Copy link
Owner

@bytecauldron
Copy link
Contributor Author

The items in the https://github.com/bytecauldron/awesome-gamemaker#youtube section could use a description. Now it's just a random list of YouTube channels without any context.

Gotcha, I'll work on getting that section polished up. Much appreciated!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants