Skip to content

docs(samples): add the scroll-sync stress document, by @Guardiancelte - #516

Merged
PathGao merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
docs/samples-stress-test
Aug 7, 2026
Merged

docs(samples): add the scroll-sync stress document, by @Guardiancelte#516
PathGao merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
docs/samples-stress-test

Conversation

@PathGao

@PathGao PathGao commented Aug 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

The document @Guardiancelte has been retesting scroll sync against, kept in the repository so the next change to it has the same thing to fail against.

3,164 lines — 124 headings, 543 table rows, three Mermaid diagrams, code blocks in eight languages, footnotes, math, raw HTML and text in seven scripts. It is what found both defects fixed in #515: a table's rows and a rendered diagram report positions the scroll mapping could not read, and neither showed up in a fixture written by the person fixing the bug.

The commit is authored to him, through his GitHub noreply address, because he wrote it — this is his contribution, not ours carrying his file. @Guardiancelte, if you would rather it were not committed here, or not under your name, say so and it comes straight back out.

He also reported #205 and retested every round of fixes against it: #196, #304, #316, #474, and now #515.

3,164 lines: 124 headings, 543 table rows, three Mermaid diagrams, code
blocks in eight languages, footnotes, math, raw HTML and text in seven
scripts. Written to compare Markdown readers, and the document that found
both defects fixed in #515 — a table's rows and a rendered diagram report
positions the scroll mapping could not read.

Authored to @Guardiancelte, who wrote it, reported #205 and retested every
round of scroll-sync fixes against it.
@PathGao
PathGao merged commit a33c37d into master Aug 7, 2026
4 checks passed
@PathGao
PathGao deleted the docs/samples-stress-test branch August 7, 2026 09:51
PathGao pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2026
This reverts commit a33c37d, so that the
next commit can add the same file back under the name of the person who
wrote it.

The squash merge rewrote the author. The pull request carried one commit,
authored to @Guardiancelte through his GitHub noreply address; squashing
replaced that with the account that opened the pull request, so the file
landed with no trace of him in the history and he did not appear in the
repository's contributor list. `master` is protected, so the commit could
not be amended in place.

Net effect of this commit and the next one on the tree: nothing. The file
comes back byte for byte.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
PathGao pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2026
Learned from #516. The rule is one line; the reason it needs writing down is
that the damage is invisible at merge time and unfixable afterwards on a
protected branch.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@Guardiancelte

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No worries, that is actually my first public commit then ;). Honoured that is for such a cool project.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants