Skip to content

docs(samples): re-land the stress document under its author (rebase-merge, please) - #519

Merged
PathGao merged 3 commits into
masterfrom
docs/samples-authorship
Aug 7, 2026
Merged

docs(samples): re-land the stress document under its author (rebase-merge, please)#519
PathGao merged 3 commits into
masterfrom
docs/samples-authorship

Conversation

@PathGao

@PathGao PathGao commented Aug 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Important

Merge this with "Rebase and merge", not "Squash and merge" — squashing is the thing this pull request exists to undo, and it would undo it again.

#516 carried one commit, authored to @Guardiancelte through his GitHub noreply address, because he wrote the document. The squash merge replaced that author with the account that opened the pull request, so samples/stress-test-hard.md is on master with nothing in the history saying where it came from, and he is not in the repository's contributor list.

master is protected against force-pushes, so the commit cannot be amended in place. This does it the only way the branch allows:

Revert "docs(samples)…" removes the file
docs(samples): add the scroll-sync stress document puts it back, authored by him

The tree does not change. git diff master against the tip of this branch is empty — the file comes back byte for byte, and the two commits exist only so the history says who wrote it.

@Guardiancelte — sorry for the noise on your notifications; this is bookkeeping, and the document itself is untouched.

PathGao and others added 3 commits August 7, 2026 18:19
This reverts commit a33c37d, so that the
next commit can add the same file back under the name of the person who
wrote it.

The squash merge rewrote the author. The pull request carried one commit,
authored to @Guardiancelte through his GitHub noreply address; squashing
replaced that with the account that opened the pull request, so the file
landed with no trace of him in the history and he did not appear in the
repository's contributor list. `master` is protected, so the commit could
not be amended in place.

Net effect of this commit and the next one on the tree: nothing. The file
comes back byte for byte.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
3,164 lines: 124 headings, 543 table rows, three Mermaid diagrams, code
blocks in eight languages, footnotes, math, raw HTML and text in seven
scripts. Written to compare Markdown readers, and the document that found
both defects fixed in #515 — a table's rows and a rendered diagram report
positions the scroll mapping could not read.

Authored to @Guardiancelte, who wrote it, reported #205 and retested every
round of scroll-sync fixes against it.
Learned from #516. The rule is one line; the reason it needs writing down is
that the damage is invisible at merge time and unfixable afterwards on a
protected branch.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants