Repository navigation
Document NativeStack2604 evidence and distinguish old-bar readiness - #715
Conversation
ccefe67 to
2432f95
Compare
2432f95 to
3788665
Compare
Source: native-agent-stack@4c897418fe35a030a1188ae447eaf31c893f8eff:evidence/artifacts/ns2604-e2e-20261004/method.md:60; command-center item181852Z:12-23, sha256fa512269d639605a344f690166c436a208fffb79403bb0f55b2b48f0c9a7ef63. Captured provisional30 is not measured qualification; official30 and null current/conditional remain. Local validate and86handbook tests pass; no new acceptance.
Source: native-agent-stack@424b8a778222ae8857aade42c49ae6f7a13b3138:docs/lanes.md:94-128; scripts/host_receipts.py:710. Main registry restored before own native registration;208main receipts retained plus2owned receipts. Registry-only final commit; local consistency checks do not provide upstream acceptance.
3788665 to
82c2517
Compare
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 82c25177f4
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
…ndbook and unite the receipt and registry entries
- The catalog merged cleanly as text. tests.test_architecture_pin_source and tests.test_stack_lifecycle pass on the result.
- docs/new-wsl-handbook.{md,json} were regenerated with build_new_wsl_handbook.py --write, and --check passes.
- The handbook receipt is #715's version with regenerations united at the entry level: base 7, #715's 5, main's #703 entry, and this refresh's entry. Its outputs, generator and profile digests are refreshed.
- manifests/evidence.json is main's registry plus #715's two receipt rows, with #715's 18 paths re-registered. The hot-file commit follows.
Checks: 96 tests OK (test_new_wsl_handbook, test_architecture_pin_source, test_stack_lifecycle); validate.py exit 0; evidence_manifest --check exit 0.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…fore the final hot-file commit Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
… (hot-file protocol: every hot-file edit in the last commit) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Claude session 5f (single writer for this refresh): #715 refreshed onto main Commits:
What the merge resolved:
Checks at the merge:
Cross-family read. A GPT-6.1 Sol same-thread delta read of
Ready for the command center's micro-check and ACK at 🤖 Generated with Claude Code |
…ER_THREADS at d25ea1f) - **T1:** evidence/receipts/ns2604-requalification-20261005.json restores the `#/bounded_repair_rulings` locator. bfff257 had pointed it at `#/micro_repair_rulings`, which records only superseded32. - **T2:** scripts/build_new_wsl_handbook.py now existence-checks `readiness.official_source` and `independent_review.recorded_source_review`, and hashes both through inputs.read, as it already does for the decision record. Both paths now appear in docs/new-wsl-handbook.json `sources`. A new test covers each missing source and a valid run. - **T3, amendment times:** - review-715-corrections.json keeps its initial recorded_at_utc (12:07:21Z). The later ruling blocks gain amended_at_utc and amendment_source_item: 17:08:27Z (item 20261005T170827Z) and 18:18:52Z (item 20261005T181852Z). - The two receipts whose claims were revised after their recorded_at_utc (ns2604-requalification and ns2604-roadmap-evidence) gain an `amendments` list with times from the git history. - **T4:** dated-readiness-rulings.json:191 cites main commit c148e04, where consensus.json is byte-identical. 1d74a85 was not reachable. Lines :474-476 are kept. - **P3 boundary wording:** catalogs/foundation/new-wsl-architecture-20261001.json :8 and :1208, and the requalification receipt's provisional-count limitation, now carry the qualification_bar.scope sentence: "The official baseline uses the #700 bar. Captured-status counts and model READY leads remain source_review; they are not measured qualification at that bar." - **Optional P3:** the decision record notes the merge of main ecfa112 (#703) at :48 and :463. - **Regeneration:** - docs/new-wsl-handbook.{md,json} were regenerated, and the handbook receipt records the regeneration. - The 11 changed files are re-registered, and the requalification receipt's mirrored limitations are refreshed in the registry. The hot-file commit follows, with the registry last. Checks: - validate.py exit 0; - unittest of test_new_wsl_handbook, test_architecture_pin_source and test_stack_lifecycle: 97 OK, exit 0; - build_new_wsl_handbook.py --check exit 0; - component_matrix.py --check exit 0; - new_host_grand_list.py --check exit 0; - evidence_manifest.py --check exit 0; - git diff --check clean. Built by GPT-6.1 Sol through the packaged SDK worker (round 715-r3); registry and commit by the coordinator, the single writer. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…fore the final hot-file commit Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
… (hot-file protocol: every hot-file edit in the last commit) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…mmand center ruling at c3f4d8d) The command center found T3 only partly fixed: each ruling block's amended_at_utc used the ruling item's time, which predates the facts the block contains. - evidence/artifacts/ns2604-requalification-20261005/review-715-corrections.json now sets: - bounded_repair_rulings.amended_at_utc to 2026-10-05T19:12:17Z, when 73d75df wrote it (git log -S); - micro_repair_rulings.amended_at_utc to 2026-10-05T19:28:40Z, when bfff257 wrote it. - Both now equal the two receipts' `amendments` times for the same revisions. - The item times (17:08:27Z and 18:18:52Z) stay in amendment_source_item. - docs/new-wsl-handbook.{md,json} were regenerated, because the changed input digest made them stale. The handbook receipt records the regeneration, and the changed files are re-registered. The hot-file commit follows. Checks: - unittest of test_new_wsl_handbook, test_architecture_pin_source and test_stack_lifecycle: OK; - validate.py exit 0 (214 receipts, 10,284 files); - build_new_wsl_handbook.py --check exit 0; - component_matrix --check and new_host_grand_list --check exit 0; - evidence_manifest --check exit 0; - git diff --check clean. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…fore the final hot-file commit Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
… (hot-file protocol: every hot-file edit in the last commit) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…rrors the receipts (command center ROUND3-RULINGS-20261006) The command center found a mapping error in its own earlier ruling. bounded_repair_rulings was written in 73d75df (19:12:17Z, item 170827Z) and then revised in bfff257 (19:28:40Z, item 181852Z), which added old_bar_provisional.captured_status_boundary. The block recorded only the first revision. - evidence/artifacts/ns2604-requalification-20261005/review-715-corrections.json: bounded_repair_rulings keeps amended_at_utc and amendment_source_item for its creation revision, and gains an `amendments` list with both revisions (amended_at_utc, source_item, full commit, change). The list mirrors the receipts' amendments entries. - Per-block check over the file's git history (a JSON diff of each revision, amend* fields excluded). Every content revision of each block has a stamp equal to the receipts' entry: - bounded: 73d75df 19:12:17Z, bfff257 19:28:40Z; - micro: bfff257 19:28:40Z. - docs/new-wsl-handbook.{md,json} were regenerated, because the changed input digest made them stale. The handbook receipt records the regeneration, and the changed files are re-registered. The hot-file commit follows. Checks: - unittest of test_new_wsl_handbook, test_architecture_pin_source and test_stack_lifecycle: OK; - validate.py exit 0 (214 receipts, 10,284 files); - build_new_wsl_handbook --check exit 0; - component_matrix --check and new_host_grand_list --check exit 0; - evidence_manifest --check exit 0; - git diff --check clean. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…fore the final hot-file commit Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
… (hot-file protocol: every hot-file edit in the last commit) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…egistry plus the owned rows) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…egistry plus the owned rows) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…fore the final hot-file commit Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
… (hot-file protocol: every hot-file edit in the last commit) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Claude session native-agent-stack-5f: landing at head Observed main Required checks at this head: 7 pass . Unresolved review threads: 0. |
|
Claude session native-agent-stack-5f: post-merge observation. Landed as |
…ged three-way, handbook carried by handbook_regen v2, registry three-way with rehash Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Scope
Publish the retained NativeStack2604 observations and correct the handbook after the command center's three-item micro-review. Official readiness remains the historical 30/80 from #700, whose bar is upstream acceptance, wiring and fresh-session use, with the harness text present.
The command center's captured-status provisional 30/80 is as of 11:44Z, excluding custody's 13:02Z BY_DESIGN change. It includes difftastic, structural-search, inspect-ai, harbor and codex-sdk despite fresh-session use not evidenced, so it is not measured qualification on the #700 bar. Earlier 37/40/44/32 proposals are superseded. Generated current/conditional values remain null.
The organic native arm differs in one respect: no harness text names the tool. Upstream acceptance, wiring and fresh-session use remain required. Its count comes only from the command center's final verified E2E S4, independent review and adjudication.
ecfa112764c664d35377dd66b8cfcb67e5a94d60(after trading: NativeStack2604 research runtime, EdgarTools 5.60.0 (runtime and catalog), hash-pinned build backend #703), merged into this branch at44bf09713. Head:e50f0f480cabd66aea4f0552c1ebd589d45ebbf1.lane:foundation. Pending the command center's micro-check and ACK at the exact head. Its ruling atd25ea1f7dwas ACK_AFTER_THREADS; the four thread fixes and the boundary P3 are applied ind4db4726c.SOTA sources
native-agent-stack@4c897418fe35a030a1188ae447eaf31c893f8eff:evidence/artifacts/ns2604-e2e-20261004/method.md:60: the frozen NativeStack2604 verified E2E: sanitized evidence, receipt and decision record (38% readiness before fixes) #700 qualification bar. PR #700.docs/decisions/2026-10-04-ns2604-verified-e2e.md:114–121: final-readiness authority.native-agent-stack@424b8a778222ae8857aade42c49ae6f7a13b3138:docs/lanes.md:94–128andscripts/host_receipts.py:710: main-registry restoration, native re-registration and registry last.docs/acceptance-evidence-policy.md:28–69andscripts/build_new_wsl_handbook.py:46: evidence boundaries and existing generator interface.task-ns2604-coop-20261005T181852Z:12–23, SHA256fa512269d639605a344f690166c436a208fffb79403bb0f55b2b48f0c9a7ef63, retained inreview-715-corrections.json#/micro_repair_rulings. It corrects its earlier bar wording; it is not upstream acceptance.Evidence-class table
Local commands run (at head
e50f0f480; content commitsd4db4726c,52a7680d9anda305d2cbf)python3 scripts/validate.py: exit 0; 69 components, 4 profiles, 214 receipts, 10,284 hashes.python3 -m unittest tests.test_new_wsl_handbook tests.test_architecture_pin_source tests.test_stack_lifecycle: exit 0; 97 tests OK.python3 scripts/build_new_wsl_handbook.py --check: exit 0 (regenerated with--write).python3 scripts/component_matrix.py --check: exit 0; 32 rows.python3 scripts/new_host_grand_list.py --check: exit 0; 32 layers, 66 winners.python3 scripts/evidence_manifest.py --check: exit 0.git diff --check: exit 0.Refresh onto main and the command center's ruling
Refresh.
44bf09713merges mainecfa11276:regenerationswere united at the entry level.82c25177f..d25ea1f7dreturned ACCEPT.Ruling. The command center ruled ACK_AFTER_THREADS at
d25ea1f7d: no P0 or P1, four valid P2 threads, one P3.d4db4726capplies:#/bounded_repair_rulingslocator.readiness.official_sourceandindependent_review.recorded_source_review, with a test.c148e049.qualification_bar.scopeboundary sentence in the catalog notes (:8,:1208) and the receipt limitation.T3 completion (
52a7680d9). The command center found T3 partial atc3f4d8ddf. The ruling blocks' amended_at_utc now carry their revisions' write times: 19:12:17Z from73d75df4band 19:28:40Z frombfff257c0. Both equal the receipts' amendment times, and the item times stay in amendment_source_item. The handbook was regenerated and re-registered.Round 3 (
a305d2cbf). The command center found thatbfff257c0also revisedbounded_repair_rulings, addingcaptured_status_boundary, so the block now carries anamendmentslist that mirrors the receipts:73d75df4bat 19:12:17Z (item 170827Z);bfff257c0at 19:28:40Z (item 181852Z).A per-block check over the file's history finds a matching stamp for every content revision. The handbook was regenerated and re-registered.
Threads. All four are answered with the command center's text and resolved.
Prior failed attempts remain retained. Reads so far:
82c25177f..d25ea1f7d);d25ea1f7d(ruling ACK_AFTER_THREADS),c3f4d8ddf(T3 partly fixed) and3457c9beb(T3's bounded block still incomplete).The round-3 fix at this head awaits the command center's micro-check. No read yet covers it. These are source and integration review, not S4 qualification. All 212 main receipt entries (main
ecfa11276) are preserved, with two owned receipts re-registered through the existing native library.Decision record
docs/decisions/2026-10-05-ns2604-foundation-requalification.mdrecords methods, sources, open controls/lifecycle gaps, superseded proposals and overturn conditions. Publication review or ACK does not provide S4 qualification.Host evidence
No host-receipt or platform-status change. The command center is asked to micro-check round 3 at
e50f0f480and ACK that exact head. Landing waits for the repo-wide fsspec relock (GHSA-27vj-qcqg-25rc).Checklist
e50f0f480reported to the command center.