Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

read2: Use inner function instead of closure #50726

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 17, 2018
Merged

read2: Use inner function instead of closure #50726

merged 1 commit into from
May 17, 2018

Conversation

udoprog
Copy link
Contributor

@udoprog udoprog commented May 14, 2018

Very minor thing, but there doesn't appear to be a reason to use a closure here.

Generated code is identical in my tests, but I believe it's clearer that nothing from the environment is being used.

@pietroalbini
Copy link
Member

r? @sfackler

@pietroalbini pietroalbini added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 14, 2018
@sfackler
Copy link
Member

r? @alexcrichton

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 14, 2018

📌 Commit 56f505e has been approved by alexcrichton

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 14, 2018
@kennytm
Copy link
Member

kennytm commented May 15, 2018

@bors rollup

kennytm added a commit to kennytm/rust that referenced this pull request May 15, 2018
read2: Use inner function instead of closure

Very minor thing, but there doesn't appear to be a reason to use a closure here.

Generated code is identical in my tests, but I believe it's clearer that nothing from the environment is being used.
kennytm added a commit to kennytm/rust that referenced this pull request May 16, 2018
read2: Use inner function instead of closure

Very minor thing, but there doesn't appear to be a reason to use a closure here.

Generated code is identical in my tests, but I believe it's clearer that nothing from the environment is being used.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2018
Rollup of 17 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #50170 (Implement From for more types on Cow)
 - #50638 (Don't unconditionally set CLOEXEC twice on every fd we open on Linux)
 - #50656 (Fix `fn main() -> impl Trait` for non-`Termination` trait)
 - #50669 (rustdoc: deprecate `#![doc(passes, plugins, no_default_passes)]`)
 - #50726 (read2: Use inner function instead of closure)
 - #50728 (Fix rustdoc panic with `impl Trait` in type parameters)
 - #50736 (env: remove unwrap in examples in favor of try op)
 - #50740 (Remove LazyBTreeMap.)
 - #50752 (Add missing error codes in libsyntax-ext asm)
 - #50779 (Make mutable_noalias and arg_align_attributes be tracked)
 - #50787 (Fix run-make wasm tests)
 - #50788 (Fix an ICE when casting a nonexistent const)
 - #50789 (Ensure libraries built in stage0 have unique metadata)
 - #50793 (tidy: Add a check for empty UI test files)
 - #50797 (fix a typo in signed-integer::from_str_radix())
 - #50808 (Stabilize num::NonZeroU*)
 - #50809 (GitHub: Stop treating Cargo.lock as a generated file.)

Failed merges:
@bors bors merged commit 56f505e into rust-lang:master May 17, 2018
@udoprog udoprog deleted the read2-inner-fn branch May 17, 2018 06:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants