-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
rustdoc: don't mark Box<T> as Iterator, Read, etc #103432
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jsha
added
the
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
label
Oct 23, 2022
r? @notriddle (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Oct 23, 2022
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
GuillaumeGomez
approved these changes
Oct 23, 2022
Looks good to me, thanks! Please just add a trailing newline at the end of the test to fix the CI error. |
jsha
commented
Oct 23, 2022
src/librustdoc/html/render/mod.rs
Outdated
// as being notably an Iterator (etc), though, so we exempt it. Pin has the same | ||
// issue, with a pass-through impl for Future. | ||
if Some(did) == cx.tcx().lang_items().owned_box() || | ||
Some(did) == cx.tcx().lang_items().pin_type() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yep, it's used just below to find impls.
jsha
force-pushed
the
box-is-not-notable
branch
from
October 23, 2022 23:37
28c055c
to
e05382d
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Because Box<T> has pass-through implementations, rustdoc was giving it the "Notable Traits" treatment for Iterator, Read, Write, and Future, even when the type of T was unspecified. Pin had the same problem, but just for Future.
jsha
force-pushed
the
box-is-not-notable
branch
from
October 24, 2022 05:14
e05382d
to
63d1a72
Compare
Fixed! |
Thanks! @bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Oct 26, 2022
compiler-errors
added a commit
to compiler-errors/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 26, 2022
…meGomez rustdoc: don't mark Box<T> as Iterator, Read, etc Because Box<T> has pass-through implementations, rustdoc was giving it the "Notable Traits" treatment for Iterator, Read, Write, and Future, even when the type of T was unspecified. Pin had the same problem, but just for Future. Fixes rust-lang#100320
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 26, 2022
Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#103432 (rustdoc: don't mark Box<T> as Iterator, Read, etc) - rust-lang#103526 (More dupe typos again) - rust-lang#103537 (rustdoc: combine shared CSS between `.*-line-numbers`) - rust-lang#103549 (llvm-16: Don't initialize removed legacy passes) - rust-lang#103558 (Update cargo) - rust-lang#103567 (ptr::eq: clarify that comparing dyn Trait is fragile) - rust-lang#103579 (:arrow_up: rust-analyzer) - rust-lang#103580 (Fix typo in docs for `guaranteed_ne`) - rust-lang#103596 (thread::set_name: debug-assert that things went well) - rust-lang#103598 (rustc_lexer::TokenKind improve docs) Failed merges: - rust-lang#103585 (Migrate source line numbers CSS to CSS variables) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Aaron1011
pushed a commit
to Aaron1011/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 6, 2023
…meGomez rustdoc: don't mark Box<T> as Iterator, Read, etc Because Box<T> has pass-through implementations, rustdoc was giving it the "Notable Traits" treatment for Iterator, Read, Write, and Future, even when the type of T was unspecified. Pin had the same problem, but just for Future. Fixes rust-lang#100320
Aaron1011
pushed a commit
to Aaron1011/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 6, 2023
Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#103432 (rustdoc: don't mark Box<T> as Iterator, Read, etc) - rust-lang#103526 (More dupe typos again) - rust-lang#103537 (rustdoc: combine shared CSS between `.*-line-numbers`) - rust-lang#103549 (llvm-16: Don't initialize removed legacy passes) - rust-lang#103558 (Update cargo) - rust-lang#103567 (ptr::eq: clarify that comparing dyn Trait is fragile) - rust-lang#103579 (:arrow_up: rust-analyzer) - rust-lang#103580 (Fix typo in docs for `guaranteed_ne`) - rust-lang#103596 (thread::set_name: debug-assert that things went well) - rust-lang#103598 (rustc_lexer::TokenKind improve docs) Failed merges: - rust-lang#103585 (Migrate source line numbers CSS to CSS variables) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
pietroalbini
added a commit
to ferrocene/sphinx-shared-resources
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2023
600: Pull changes from upstream `master` r=kirtchev-adacore a=pietroalbini * rust-lang/rust#103605 * rust-lang/rust#103604 * rust-lang/rust#103598 * rust-lang/rust#103596 * rust-lang/rust#103580 * rust-lang/rust#103579 * rust-lang/rust#103567 * rust-lang/rust#103558 * rust-lang/rust#103549 * rust-lang/rust#103537 * rust-lang/rust#103526 * rust-lang/rust#103432 * rust-lang/rust#103571 * rust-lang/rust#103492 * rust-lang/rust#103572 * rust-lang/rust#103554 * rust-lang/rust#103546 * rust-lang/rust#103543 * rust-lang/rust#103428 * rust-lang/rust#102706 * rust-lang/rust#95710 * rust-lang/rust#103284 * rust-lang/rust#103562 * rust-lang/rust#103542 * rust-lang/rust#103536 * rust-lang/rust#103533 * rust-lang/rust#103520 * rust-lang/rust#103444 * rust-lang/rust#103430 * rust-lang/rust#103416 * rust-lang/rust#103287 * rust-lang/rust#103209 * rust-lang/rust#102951 * rust-lang/rust#103279 * rust-lang/rust#103158 Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Pietro Albini <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: DropDemBits <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: bors <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Pietro Albini <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Because Box has pass-through implementations, rustdoc was giving it the "Notable Traits" treatment for Iterator, Read, Write, and Future, even when the type of T was unspecified.
Pin had the same problem, but just for Future.
Fixes #100320