Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 6 pull requests #103188

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Oct 18, 2022
Merged

Rollup of 6 pull requests #103188

merged 12 commits into from
Oct 18, 2022

Conversation

JohnTitor
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

andrewpollack and others added 12 commits October 13, 2022 21:26
The final return value doesn't need to be tried at all -- we can just
return the checked option directly. The optimizer can probably figure
this out anyway, but there's no need to make it work here.
…tmandry

Adding `fuchsia-ignore` and `needs-unwind` to compiler test cases

Final tests covering missing privileges

r? ``@tmandry``

cc. ``@djkoloski``
Make diagnostic for unsatisfied `Termination` bounds more precise

Don't blindly emit a diagnostic claiming that “*`main` has an invalid return type*” if we encounter a type that should but doesn't implement `std::process::Termination` and isn't actually the return type of the program entry `main`.

Fixes rust-lang#103052.

``@rustbot`` label A-diagnostics T-compiler T-libs
r? diagnostics
…-Simulacrum

Fix typo in `ReverseSearcher` docs
…=Mark-Simulacrum

Remove the redundant `Some(try_opt!(..))` in `checked_pow`

The final return value doesn't need to be tried at all -- we can just
return the checked option directly. The optimizer can probably figure
this out anyway, but there's no need to make it work here.
…=scottmcm

Remove all uses of array_assume_init

See rust-lang#103134 (comment)

r? `@scottmcm`
@rustbot rustbot added T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Oct 18, 2022
@JohnTitor
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=6

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 18, 2022

📌 Commit 6e7d206 has been approved by JohnTitor

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Oct 18, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 18, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 6e7d206 with merge e94827e...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 18, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: JohnTitor
Pushing e94827e to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Oct 18, 2022
@bors bors merged commit e94827e into rust-lang:master Oct 18, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.66.0 milestone Oct 18, 2022
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Perf Build Sha
#103168 027451c7bddaaea53c9010e7a6d8572de0ba7bea
#103163 903f68517dfb6bc4ba3f12fa28108583dd9dd8f9
#103159 58d232746bc3341db45628bcf3559df1a1abfd62
#103154 edb07bf54998f958a1fab5dcda9b07d4946f3015
#103142 a52c524f948063b2f0517181eac84ae8931e6627
#103023 8b08384a371932c1f210d1453c2bc639798e9f8b

previous master: 21b246587c

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (e94827e): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean1 range count2
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
3.4% [2.3%, 4.6%] 9
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-4.4% [-4.4%, -4.4%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -4.4% [-4.4%, -4.4%] 1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Footnotes

  1. the arithmetic mean of the percent change

  2. number of relevant changes

@JohnTitor JohnTitor deleted the rollup-pwilam1 branch October 18, 2022 22:34
Aaron1011 pushed a commit to Aaron1011/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2023
Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#103023 (Adding `fuchsia-ignore` and `needs-unwind` to compiler test cases)
 - rust-lang#103142 (Make diagnostic for unsatisfied `Termination` bounds more precise)
 - rust-lang#103154 (Fix typo in `ReverseSearcher` docs)
 - rust-lang#103159 (Remove the redundant `Some(try_opt!(..))` in `checked_pow`)
 - rust-lang#103163 (Remove all uses of array_assume_init)
 - rust-lang#103168 (Stabilize asm_sym)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants