Custom dbg! macros for dbg_macro lint
#11303
Comments
33 tasks
|
I'd assume it was this PR which changed it from a simple path check to a diagnostic item: #8411 The lint's purpose is only the |
|
If one gets that level of customization, then it would be fine. Though if we wanted it to be as flexible, we would also need to be able to customize the lint level per path (which may be desirable anyway -- filled #11307), since right now a project may put a different level to |
ojeda
added a commit
to ojeda/linux
that referenced
this issue
Sep 3, 2024
Back when we used Rust 1.60.0 (before Rust was merged in the kernel), we added `-Wclippy::dbg_macro` to the compilation flags. This worked great with our custom `dbg!` macro (vendored from `std`, but slightly modified to use the kernel printing facilities). However, in the very next version, 1.61.0, it stopped working [1] since the lint started to use a Rust diagnostic item rather than a path to find the `dbg!` macro [1]. This behavior remains until the current nightly (1.83.0). Therefore, currently, the `dbg_macro` is not doing anything, which explains why we can invoke `dbg!` in samples/rust/rust_print.rs`, as well as why changing the `#[allow()]`s to `#[expect()]`s in `std_vendor.rs` doctests does not work since they are not fulfilled. One possible workaround is using `rustc_attrs` like the standard library does. However, this is intended to be internal, and we just started supporting several Rust compiler versions, so it is best to avoid it. Therefore, instead, use `disallowed_macros`. It is a stable lint and is more flexible (in that we can provide different macros), although its diagnostic message(s) are not as nice as the specialized one (yet), and does not allow to set different lint levels per macro/path [2]. In turn, this requires allowing the (intentional) `dbg!` use in the sample, as one would have expected. Finally, in a single case, the `allow` is fixed to be an inner attribute, since otherwise it was not being applied. Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11303 [1] Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11307 [2] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
ojeda
added a commit
to ojeda/linux
that referenced
this issue
Sep 4, 2024
Back when we used Rust 1.60.0 (before Rust was merged in the kernel), we added `-Wclippy::dbg_macro` to the compilation flags. This worked great with our custom `dbg!` macro (vendored from `std`, but slightly modified to use the kernel printing facilities). However, in the very next version, 1.61.0, it stopped working [1] since the lint started to use a Rust diagnostic item rather than a path to find the `dbg!` macro [1]. This behavior remains until the current nightly (1.83.0). Therefore, currently, the `dbg_macro` is not doing anything, which explains why we can invoke `dbg!` in samples/rust/rust_print.rs`, as well as why changing the `#[allow()]`s to `#[expect()]`s in `std_vendor.rs` doctests does not work since they are not fulfilled. One possible workaround is using `rustc_attrs` like the standard library does. However, this is intended to be internal, and we just started supporting several Rust compiler versions, so it is best to avoid it. Therefore, instead, use `disallowed_macros`. It is a stable lint and is more flexible (in that we can provide different macros), although its diagnostic message(s) are not as nice as the specialized one (yet), and does not allow to set different lint levels per macro/path [2]. In turn, this requires allowing the (intentional) `dbg!` use in the sample, as one would have expected. Finally, in a single case, the `allow` is fixed to be an inner attribute, since otherwise it was not being applied. Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11303 [1] Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11307 [2] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
ojeda
added a commit
to ojeda/linux
that referenced
this issue
Sep 4, 2024
Back when we used Rust 1.60.0 (before Rust was merged in the kernel), we added `-Wclippy::dbg_macro` to the compilation flags. This worked great with our custom `dbg!` macro (vendored from `std`, but slightly modified to use the kernel printing facilities). However, in the very next version, 1.61.0, it stopped working [1] since the lint started to use a Rust diagnostic item rather than a path to find the `dbg!` macro [1]. This behavior remains until the current nightly (1.83.0). Therefore, currently, the `dbg_macro` is not doing anything, which explains why we can invoke `dbg!` in samples/rust/rust_print.rs`, as well as why changing the `#[allow()]`s to `#[expect()]`s in `std_vendor.rs` doctests does not work since they are not fulfilled. One possible workaround is using `rustc_attrs` like the standard library does. However, this is intended to be internal, and we just started supporting several Rust compiler versions, so it is best to avoid it. Therefore, instead, use `disallowed_macros`. It is a stable lint and is more flexible (in that we can provide different macros), although its diagnostic message(s) are not as nice as the specialized one (yet), and does not allow to set different lint levels per macro/path [2]. In turn, this requires allowing the (intentional) `dbg!` use in the sample, as one would have expected. Finally, in a single case, the `allow` is fixed to be an inner attribute, since otherwise it was not being applied. Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11303 [1] Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11307 [2] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
ojeda
added a commit
to ojeda/linux
that referenced
this issue
Oct 3, 2024
Back when we used Rust 1.60.0 (before Rust was merged in the kernel), we added `-Wclippy::dbg_macro` to the compilation flags. This worked great with our custom `dbg!` macro (vendored from `std`, but slightly modified to use the kernel printing facilities). However, in the very next version, 1.61.0, it stopped working [1] since the lint started to use a Rust diagnostic item rather than a path to find the `dbg!` macro [1]. This behavior remains until the current nightly (1.83.0). Therefore, currently, the `dbg_macro` is not doing anything, which explains why we can invoke `dbg!` in samples/rust/rust_print.rs`, as well as why changing the `#[allow()]`s to `#[expect()]`s in `std_vendor.rs` doctests does not work since they are not fulfilled. One possible workaround is using `rustc_attrs` like the standard library does. However, this is intended to be internal, and we just started supporting several Rust compiler versions, so it is best to avoid it. Therefore, instead, use `disallowed_macros`. It is a stable lint and is more flexible (in that we can provide different macros), although its diagnostic message(s) are not as nice as the specialized one (yet), and does not allow to set different lint levels per macro/path [2]. In turn, this requires allowing the (intentional) `dbg!` use in the sample, as one would have expected. Finally, in a single case, the `allow` is fixed to be an inner attribute, since otherwise it was not being applied. Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11303 [1] Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11307 [2] Tested-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
ojeda
added a commit
to Rust-for-Linux/linux
that referenced
this issue
Oct 7, 2024
Back when we used Rust 1.60.0 (before Rust was merged in the kernel), we added `-Wclippy::dbg_macro` to the compilation flags. This worked great with our custom `dbg!` macro (vendored from `std`, but slightly modified to use the kernel printing facilities). However, in the very next version, 1.61.0, it stopped working [1] since the lint started to use a Rust diagnostic item rather than a path to find the `dbg!` macro [1]. This behavior remains until the current nightly (1.83.0). Therefore, currently, the `dbg_macro` is not doing anything, which explains why we can invoke `dbg!` in samples/rust/rust_print.rs`, as well as why changing the `#[allow()]`s to `#[expect()]`s in `std_vendor.rs` doctests does not work since they are not fulfilled. One possible workaround is using `rustc_attrs` like the standard library does. However, this is intended to be internal, and we just started supporting several Rust compiler versions, so it is best to avoid it. Therefore, instead, use `disallowed_macros`. It is a stable lint and is more flexible (in that we can provide different macros), although its diagnostic message(s) are not as nice as the specialized one (yet), and does not allow to set different lint levels per macro/path [2]. In turn, this requires allowing the (intentional) `dbg!` use in the sample, as one would have expected. Finally, in a single case, the `allow` is fixed to be an inner attribute, since otherwise it was not being applied. Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11303 [1] Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11307 [2] Tested-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
ojeda
added a commit
to Rust-for-Linux/linux
that referenced
this issue
Oct 7, 2024
Back when we used Rust 1.60.0 (before Rust was merged in the kernel), we added `-Wclippy::dbg_macro` to the compilation flags. This worked great with our custom `dbg!` macro (vendored from `std`, but slightly modified to use the kernel printing facilities). However, in the very next version, 1.61.0, it stopped working [1] since the lint started to use a Rust diagnostic item rather than a path to find the `dbg!` macro [1]. This behavior remains until the current nightly (1.83.0). Therefore, currently, the `dbg_macro` is not doing anything, which explains why we can invoke `dbg!` in samples/rust/rust_print.rs`, as well as why changing the `#[allow()]`s to `#[expect()]`s in `std_vendor.rs` doctests does not work since they are not fulfilled. One possible workaround is using `rustc_attrs` like the standard library does. However, this is intended to be internal, and we just started supporting several Rust compiler versions, so it is best to avoid it. Therefore, instead, use `disallowed_macros`. It is a stable lint and is more flexible (in that we can provide different macros), although its diagnostic message(s) are not as nice as the specialized one (yet), and does not allow to set different lint levels per macro/path [2]. In turn, this requires allowing the (intentional) `dbg!` use in the sample, as one would have expected. Finally, in a single case, the `allow` is fixed to be an inner attribute, since otherwise it was not being applied. Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11303 [1] Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11307 [2] Tested-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
alistair23
pushed a commit
to alistair23/linux
that referenced
this issue
Nov 11, 2024
Back when we used Rust 1.60.0 (before Rust was merged in the kernel), we added `-Wclippy::dbg_macro` to the compilation flags. This worked great with our custom `dbg!` macro (vendored from `std`, but slightly modified to use the kernel printing facilities). However, in the very next version, 1.61.0, it stopped working [1] since the lint started to use a Rust diagnostic item rather than a path to find the `dbg!` macro [1]. This behavior remains until the current nightly (1.83.0). Therefore, currently, the `dbg_macro` is not doing anything, which explains why we can invoke `dbg!` in samples/rust/rust_print.rs`, as well as why changing the `#[allow()]`s to `#[expect()]`s in `std_vendor.rs` doctests does not work since they are not fulfilled. One possible workaround is using `rustc_attrs` like the standard library does. However, this is intended to be internal, and we just started supporting several Rust compiler versions, so it is best to avoid it. Therefore, instead, use `disallowed_macros`. It is a stable lint and is more flexible (in that we can provide different macros), although its diagnostic message(s) are not as nice as the specialized one (yet), and does not allow to set different lint levels per macro/path [2]. In turn, this requires allowing the (intentional) `dbg!` use in the sample, as one would have expected. Finally, in a single case, the `allow` is fixed to be an inner attribute, since otherwise it was not being applied. Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11303 [1] Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11307 [2] Tested-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
alistair23
pushed a commit
to alistair23/linux
that referenced
this issue
Nov 12, 2024
Back when we used Rust 1.60.0 (before Rust was merged in the kernel), we added `-Wclippy::dbg_macro` to the compilation flags. This worked great with our custom `dbg!` macro (vendored from `std`, but slightly modified to use the kernel printing facilities). However, in the very next version, 1.61.0, it stopped working [1] since the lint started to use a Rust diagnostic item rather than a path to find the `dbg!` macro [1]. This behavior remains until the current nightly (1.83.0). Therefore, currently, the `dbg_macro` is not doing anything, which explains why we can invoke `dbg!` in samples/rust/rust_print.rs`, as well as why changing the `#[allow()]`s to `#[expect()]`s in `std_vendor.rs` doctests does not work since they are not fulfilled. One possible workaround is using `rustc_attrs` like the standard library does. However, this is intended to be internal, and we just started supporting several Rust compiler versions, so it is best to avoid it. Therefore, instead, use `disallowed_macros`. It is a stable lint and is more flexible (in that we can provide different macros), although its diagnostic message(s) are not as nice as the specialized one (yet), and does not allow to set different lint levels per macro/path [2]. In turn, this requires allowing the (intentional) `dbg!` use in the sample, as one would have expected. Finally, in a single case, the `allow` is fixed to be an inner attribute, since otherwise it was not being applied. Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11303 [1] Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11307 [2] Tested-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
90 tasks
herrnst
pushed a commit
to herrnst/linux-asahi
that referenced
this issue
Nov 21, 2024
Back when we used Rust 1.60.0 (before Rust was merged in the kernel), we added `-Wclippy::dbg_macro` to the compilation flags. This worked great with our custom `dbg!` macro (vendored from `std`, but slightly modified to use the kernel printing facilities). However, in the very next version, 1.61.0, it stopped working [1] since the lint started to use a Rust diagnostic item rather than a path to find the `dbg!` macro [1]. This behavior remains until the current nightly (1.83.0). Therefore, currently, the `dbg_macro` is not doing anything, which explains why we can invoke `dbg!` in samples/rust/rust_print.rs`, as well as why changing the `#[allow()]`s to `#[expect()]`s in `std_vendor.rs` doctests does not work since they are not fulfilled. One possible workaround is using `rustc_attrs` like the standard library does. However, this is intended to be internal, and we just started supporting several Rust compiler versions, so it is best to avoid it. Therefore, instead, use `disallowed_macros`. It is a stable lint and is more flexible (in that we can provide different macros), although its diagnostic message(s) are not as nice as the specialized one (yet), and does not allow to set different lint levels per macro/path [2]. In turn, this requires allowing the (intentional) `dbg!` use in the sample, as one would have expected. Finally, in a single case, the `allow` is fixed to be an inner attribute, since otherwise it was not being applied. Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11303 [1] Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11307 [2] Tested-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
herrnst
pushed a commit
to herrnst/linux-asahi
that referenced
this issue
Nov 22, 2024
Back when we used Rust 1.60.0 (before Rust was merged in the kernel), we added `-Wclippy::dbg_macro` to the compilation flags. This worked great with our custom `dbg!` macro (vendored from `std`, but slightly modified to use the kernel printing facilities). However, in the very next version, 1.61.0, it stopped working [1] since the lint started to use a Rust diagnostic item rather than a path to find the `dbg!` macro [1]. This behavior remains until the current nightly (1.83.0). Therefore, currently, the `dbg_macro` is not doing anything, which explains why we can invoke `dbg!` in samples/rust/rust_print.rs`, as well as why changing the `#[allow()]`s to `#[expect()]`s in `std_vendor.rs` doctests does not work since they are not fulfilled. One possible workaround is using `rustc_attrs` like the standard library does. However, this is intended to be internal, and we just started supporting several Rust compiler versions, so it is best to avoid it. Therefore, instead, use `disallowed_macros`. It is a stable lint and is more flexible (in that we can provide different macros), although its diagnostic message(s) are not as nice as the specialized one (yet), and does not allow to set different lint levels per macro/path [2]. In turn, this requires allowing the (intentional) `dbg!` use in the sample, as one would have expected. Finally, in a single case, the `allow` is fixed to be an inner attribute, since otherwise it was not being applied. Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11303 [1] Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11307 [2] Tested-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
WhatAmISupposedToPutHere
pushed a commit
to WhatAmISupposedToPutHere/linux
that referenced
this issue
Nov 23, 2024
Back when we used Rust 1.60.0 (before Rust was merged in the kernel), we added `-Wclippy::dbg_macro` to the compilation flags. This worked great with our custom `dbg!` macro (vendored from `std`, but slightly modified to use the kernel printing facilities). However, in the very next version, 1.61.0, it stopped working [1] since the lint started to use a Rust diagnostic item rather than a path to find the `dbg!` macro [1]. This behavior remains until the current nightly (1.83.0). Therefore, currently, the `dbg_macro` is not doing anything, which explains why we can invoke `dbg!` in samples/rust/rust_print.rs`, as well as why changing the `#[allow()]`s to `#[expect()]`s in `std_vendor.rs` doctests does not work since they are not fulfilled. One possible workaround is using `rustc_attrs` like the standard library does. However, this is intended to be internal, and we just started supporting several Rust compiler versions, so it is best to avoid it. Therefore, instead, use `disallowed_macros`. It is a stable lint and is more flexible (in that we can provide different macros), although its diagnostic message(s) are not as nice as the specialized one (yet), and does not allow to set different lint levels per macro/path [2]. In turn, this requires allowing the (intentional) `dbg!` use in the sample, as one would have expected. Finally, in a single case, the `allow` is fixed to be an inner attribute, since otherwise it was not being applied. Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11303 [1] Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11307 [2] Tested-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
herrnst
pushed a commit
to herrnst/linux-asahi
that referenced
this issue
Nov 23, 2024
Back when we used Rust 1.60.0 (before Rust was merged in the kernel), we added `-Wclippy::dbg_macro` to the compilation flags. This worked great with our custom `dbg!` macro (vendored from `std`, but slightly modified to use the kernel printing facilities). However, in the very next version, 1.61.0, it stopped working [1] since the lint started to use a Rust diagnostic item rather than a path to find the `dbg!` macro [1]. This behavior remains until the current nightly (1.83.0). Therefore, currently, the `dbg_macro` is not doing anything, which explains why we can invoke `dbg!` in samples/rust/rust_print.rs`, as well as why changing the `#[allow()]`s to `#[expect()]`s in `std_vendor.rs` doctests does not work since they are not fulfilled. One possible workaround is using `rustc_attrs` like the standard library does. However, this is intended to be internal, and we just started supporting several Rust compiler versions, so it is best to avoid it. Therefore, instead, use `disallowed_macros`. It is a stable lint and is more flexible (in that we can provide different macros), although its diagnostic message(s) are not as nice as the specialized one (yet), and does not allow to set different lint levels per macro/path [2]. In turn, this requires allowing the (intentional) `dbg!` use in the sample, as one would have expected. Finally, in a single case, the `allow` is fixed to be an inner attribute, since otherwise it was not being applied. Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11303 [1] Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11307 [2] Tested-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Back in Rust 1.60.0 we added
-Wclippy::dbg_macroto the Linux kernel compilation flags, which worked great with our customdbg!macro (essentially thestdone but calling the kernel printing facilities).However, in the next version (1.61.0), as well as the current stable (1.80.0) and the current nightly (1.83.0-nightly (bd53aa3 2024-09-02)), it does not work. Thus only the first of the following lines emit a warning:
Is the lint intended to work only with the standard library
dbgmacro? I imagine that is the case, given the move to diagnostic items in #7466, but it is not entirely clear from the lint description.A workaround is to use
disallowed_macros, but that does not have a specialized diagnostic message nor has the nicehelp:suggestion. Another is to userustc_attrs, but I imagine that is not going to be stable.Thus, instead, could the
dbg_macrolint take a configuration with paths todbg!macros (likedisallowed_macros) or, even better, could there be an attribute that users could apply to theirdbg!macro (likerustc_diagnostic_item)?Cc @xFrednet and @Alexendoo who both seemed to work on this in the past.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: